Search Results
|
Post |
Author
[desc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: hashcat64.exe doesn't work
Post: RE: hashcat64.exe doesn't work
If it's overheating you need to fix your cooling issue. That's not an hashcat issue |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
16 |
18,208 |
03-03-2017, 09:24 AM |
|
|
Thread: hashcat v3.40
Post: hashcat v3.40
[hr]
Welcome to hashcat v3.40 release!
The major changes are the following:
Added support to crack iTunes backups: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-6047.html
Added support to crack LUKS volu... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
22,347 |
03-03-2017, 06:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: 3DES (hc 3.40): K1 == K3 and K1 != K2 possible?
Post: RE: hashcat v3.40
Sure it is, but you need to patch the kernel yourself. That's why it's open source :) |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
5,473 |
03-07-2017, 09:58 AM |
|
|
Thread: Reversing MSCHAPv2 to NTLM
Post: RE: Reversing MSCHAPv2 to NTLM
No, netntlmv2 is completely different and has a dedicated hash-mode in hashcat. |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
18 |
36,659 |
03-07-2017, 10:00 AM |
|
|
Thread: Avoid character occurrance in brute force attack
Post: RE: Avoid character occurrance in brute force atta...
Typical error when you try to load hccapx into too old hashcat version |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
12 |
12,018 |
03-07-2017, 10:00 AM |
|
|
Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: RE: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
No, it's more like 11208 sounds to be correct, see here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1B1S_t1Z0KsqByH3pNkYUM-RCFMu860nlfSsYEqOoqco/edit#gid=1439721324 |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,323 |
03-07-2017, 10:02 AM |
|
|
Thread: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
Post: RE: 970m vs 290x: benchmarks
Makes sense as you compare a desktop discrete gpu with a mobile one |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
4,440 |
03-07-2017, 10:03 AM |
|
|
Thread: New parameter: --nonce-error-corrections
Post: New parameter: --nonce-error-corrections
I just wanted to do quick writeup on the new --nonce-error-corrections feature for WPA/WPA2 cracking in hashcat v3.40+x.
Afaik hashcat is the first WPA/WPA2 cracker that addresses this feature bu... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
1 |
6,154 |
03-07-2017, 08:12 PM |
|
|
Thread: Need help with the HOWTO: Ubuntu Server guide
Post: RE: Need help with the HOWTO: Ubuntu Server guide
I typically remove the i386 packages from the AMD installer script, that way I do not need to add the entire architecture |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
8 |
12,160 |
03-08-2017, 09:52 AM |
|
|
Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: RE: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
I have seen the same error with AMDGPU-pro 16.40. This is a driver issue, not a hashcat issue. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,323 |
03-08-2017, 09:54 AM |
|
|
Thread: how to crack multiple hashtype in the same time
Post: RE: how to crack multiple hashtype in the same ti...
Cracking multiple hashtypes at the same time is not supported |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
3,478 |
03-08-2017, 10:00 AM |
|
|
Thread: Avoid character occurrance in brute force attack
Post: RE: Avoid character occurrance in brute force atta...
Either the The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali) maintainer need to update the version or you use binary version from hashcat.net or you compile from sources |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
12 |
12,018 |
03-08-2017, 10:01 AM |
|
|
Thread: hybrid attack much slower in newer version of hashcat??
Post: RE: hybrid attack much slower in newer version of ...
You just need to write the attack a bit different, like this:
./hashcat --stdout -a 6 small_wordlist.txt ?a?a | ./hashcat -m2500 bla.hccapx -w 3 --status --status-timer 10 |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
3,587 |
03-08-2017, 12:08 PM |
|
|
Thread: 3DES (hc 3.40): K1 == K3 and K1 != K2 possible?
Post: RE: 3DES (hc 3.40): K1 == K3 and K1 != K2 possible...
it should be enough to set the mask correctly, but I think you will still run into integer overflow because of a too large keyspace |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
5,473 |
03-09-2017, 12:30 PM |
|
|
Thread: Avoid character occurrance in brute force attack
Post: RE: Avoid character occurrance in brute force atta...
Yes, for hashcat that is it. OpenCL might be different, but this is not OpenCL support forum! |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
12 |
12,018 |
03-09-2017, 12:31 PM |
|
|
Thread: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
Post: RE: R9 290x benchmark crashing at scrypt
How can we know, the segfault occurs inside the AMD library |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
9,323 |
03-09-2017, 12:32 PM |
|
|
Thread: NEED SOME HELP PLEASE
Post: RE: NEED SOME HELP PLEASE
That's the way to go, do not use hashcat-legacy |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
3,083 |
03-09-2017, 12:33 PM |
|
|
Thread: Anyway to benchmark with specific parameters?
Post: RE: Anyway to benchmark with specific parameters?
It's not hashcats fault, because the memory allocatable is limited by the OpenCL runtime. We've reported this to nvidia, here's a writeup: https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/992502 |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
10,660 |
03-10-2017, 11:52 AM |
|
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
For short readers: Everything is fine here. For all others, here's our analysis:
The Handshake in the cap has the following entries:
M1 and M2 from the first handshake
M1, M2, M3 and M4 from the se... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
03-10-2017, 11:58 AM |
|
|
Thread: Anyway to benchmark with specific parameters?
Post: RE: Anyway to benchmark with specific parameters?
Because CUDA doesn't run on AMD GPU, but OpenCL does |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
10,660 |
03-11-2017, 09:46 PM |