|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author
[desc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Problem using -l option with double nvidia cards
Post: RE: Problem using -l option with double nvidia car...
| the -l parameter is only needed if you want to split the workload to work on gpus of multiple computers. otherwise you do not need to set it. the optimum value depends on the number of computers, the ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
8,878 |
06-10-2010, 11:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: What linux distro do you recommend?
Post: RE: What linux distro do you recommend?
| hashcat is a 32 bit only app and you are on 64 bit linux. so you need to install 32 bit compatibility libraries. maybe this helps: sudo apt-get install ia32-libs |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
8 |
17,360 |
06-10-2010, 08:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem using -l option with double nvidia cards
Post: RE: Problem using -l option with double nvidia car...
|
phrst Wrote:
--
Here are my thoughts on this subject.
From what I gather the -l value works like this:
If I set -l 1000, it does not mean that it will test 1000 strings. Rather it will test 1000*... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
8,878 |
06-11-2010, 08:20 AM |
| |
|
Thread: OclHashcat rules
Post: RE: OclHashcat rules
|
mastercracker Wrote:
--
I think it would be a good idea to either post or put a link to a file that contains all the rules available in OclHashcat so that we can refer to it when we need it.
--
OK,... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
9,495 |
06-11-2010, 08:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: OclHashcat rules
Post: RE: OclHashcat rules
| same on hashcat, will fix that in hashcat v0.35, too |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
9,495 |
06-11-2010, 09:06 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Don't work Sha1(base64) on Hashcat
Post: RE: Don't work Sha1(base64) on Hashcat
| SHA1(Base64) has to be of fixed length 28. the hashes are ok. but you need to prefix them with the {SHA} signature. so the hashes must look like this:
Code:
--
{SHA}bTc/D9BCsSKJpUT0zfAVmvoIHcg=
... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
16,920 |
06-11-2010, 09:26 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Don't work Sha1(base64) on Hashcat
Post: RE: Don't work Sha1(base64) on Hashcat
|
talal Wrote:
--
Big thanks. :). Works
--
yw
talal Wrote:
--
Another question, if it is not difficult.
Whether the algorithm will be supported Whirlpool?
--
currently not planned |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
16,920 |
06-11-2010, 05:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Which Feature / Algo to add next to oclHashcat?
Post: Which Feature / Algo to add next to oclHashcat?
| Hey oclHashcat-Users,
i fixed all known Bugs and implemented all points from docs/todo.txt in v0.20.
Please vote for the next Feature or Algo that should be added to oclHashcat.
--
atom |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
10 |
26,410 |
06-12-2010, 08:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.20
Post: oclHashcat v0.20
| Download it here: https://hashcat.net/oclhashcat/
* changes v0.19 -> v0.20:
Code:
--
type: improvement
file: oclHashcat
desc: added wordlist segmentation, allows wordlists to be of arbitrary... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Announcements
|
0 |
6,961 |
06-18-2010, 10:42 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat and memory
Post: RE: oclHashcat and memory
| done in v0.20, thread closed |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
7 |
22,894 |
06-18-2010, 10:44 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Resume/save function for hashcat
Post: RE: Resume/save function for hashcat
| done in v0.20, thread closed |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
4 |
21,471 |
06-18-2010, 10:44 AM |
| |
|
Thread: A third slot for Oclhashcat
Post: RE: A third slot for Oclhashcat
| done in v0.20, thread closed |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
5 |
15,380 |
06-18-2010, 10:44 AM |
| |
|
Thread: [split] oclHashcat v0.19
Post: RE: [split] oclHashcat v0.19
| done in v0.20, thread closed |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
11,025 |
06-18-2010, 10:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: mysql5
Post: RE: mysql5
| done in v0.20, thread closed |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
3 |
9,933 |
06-18-2010, 10:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Domain Cached Credentials
Post: RE: Domain Cached Credentials
| there it is, thread closed |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
4 |
18,226 |
06-18-2010, 10:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: OclHashcat rules
Post: RE: OclHashcat rules
| done in v0.20, thread closed |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
9,495 |
06-18-2010, 10:46 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Which Feature / Algo to add next to oclHashcat?
Post: RE: Which Feature / Algo to add next to oclHashcat...
| my plan is to add all features (if it is possible). the poll is used to build a priority list. i will start implementing the most voted feature and when it is finished i will directly release new vers... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
10 |
26,410 |
06-18-2010, 11:50 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
| it is still on position 0/98948190, wait until it increases. then it should show a value. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
24,287 |
06-18-2010, 01:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
| made speed display more user-friendly with dynamic suffixes means M/s, k/s or just /s depending on the speed value. old version shows M/s only which means on very low speed it would show 0M/s even it ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
24,287 |
06-18-2010, 02:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
|
Quote:
--
This can`t be true !
--
uhm, moment! you changed the attack. initial post showed:
Progress..: 0/98948190 (0.00%)
now its is:
Progress..: 131072/344011 (38.10%)
Quote:
--
... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
24,287 |
06-18-2010, 04:19 PM |
