Search Results
|
Post |
Author
[asc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Limitations of some functions in the rules ?
Post: RE: Limitations of some functions in the rules ?
use A for 10, B for 11, etc |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
5,644 |
09-16-2012, 11:33 AM |
|
|
Thread: charset and unicode
Post: RE: charset and unicode
Not planned for rules, but for tables |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
13,062 |
09-16-2012, 11:34 AM |
|
|
Thread: Multi Character Re-Map
Post: RE: Multi Character Re-Map
This should work already, however the max. number of function calls per rule is limit to 14. Try with two and hashcat and --stdout mode. I dont see why this isnt working already |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
4 |
10,205 |
09-17-2012, 05:25 PM |
|
|
Thread: charset and unicode
Post: RE: charset and unicode
undeath Wrote: (09-16-2012, 12:38 PM)
--
shouldn't utf-8 work just as fine as ascii? Default garbage in, garbage out mentality?
--
Yeah i think you are talking about dictionary and in this case, ye... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
13,062 |
09-17-2012, 05:28 PM |
|
|
Thread: Debian shadowfile and hashcat CUDA
Post: RE: Debian shadowfile and hashcat CUDA
yes, its descrypt -m 1500 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
25,443 |
09-19-2012, 03:32 PM |
|
|
Thread: my Geforce Gtx 670 doesn't work with oclHashcat-plus-0.09
Post: RE: my Geforce Gtx 670 doesn't work with oclHashca...
Update driver please, looks like Backtrack ones are outdated |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
16 |
32,352 |
09-20-2012, 10:10 AM |
|
|
Thread: my Geforce Gtx 670 doesn't work with oclHashcat-plus-0.09
Post: RE: my Geforce Gtx 670 doesn't work with oclHashca...
Try with -n 1 --gpu-loops 1 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
16 |
32,352 |
09-20-2012, 11:10 AM |
|
|
Thread: Bug report
Post: RE: Bug report
What is the exact filename of the kernel it loads? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
11,578 |
09-20-2012, 08:00 PM |
|
|
Thread: my Geforce Gtx 670 doesn't work with oclHashcat-plus-0.09
Post: RE: my Geforce Gtx 670 doesn't work with oclHashca...
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
16 |
32,352 |
09-21-2012, 09:52 AM |
|
|
Thread: [LM] Append a '0' with rules file ?!
Post: RE: [LM] Append a '0' with rules file ?!
You could call it a missing feature, since 32-char LMs actually are 2 hashes not 1 hash. But calling it a bug would be wrong. Plus you have the possibility to manually workaround. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
17,468 |
09-21-2012, 09:55 AM |
|
|
Thread: Segmentation Fault when checking status
Post: RE: Segmentation Fault when checking status
I am developing on exactly this driver version exactly with the same GPU (sm_21). Maybe you should try other OS. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
1 |
5,182 |
09-21-2012, 09:56 AM |
|
|
Thread: Debian shadowfile and hashcat CUDA
Post: RE: Debian shadowfile and hashcat CUDA
Yeah, he did not read https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=mask_attack or not carefully enough |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
25,443 |
09-21-2012, 09:47 AM |
|
|
Thread: Will the Oclhashcat-plus support intel integrated GPU HD4000?
Post: RE: Will the Oclhashcat-plus support intel integra...
hd4xxx are not fully supported by OpenCL. Important instructions and fast memory (shared) access do not work. Even if it would work, it would be slow. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
13,645 |
09-21-2012, 09:51 AM |
|
|
Thread: Bug report
Post: RE: Bug report
923.1 is an very old catalyst, it should be 938.2. They are known not to work. You need 12.8 its the reason.
You may need driversweeper |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
11,578 |
09-21-2012, 09:50 AM |
|
|
Thread: my Geforce Gtx 670 doesn't work with oclHashcat-plus-0.09
Post: RE: my Geforce Gtx 670 doesn't work with oclHashca...
Your card is in the CUDA supported list: https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda/cuda-gpus
Try again with Ubuntu and tell me if it worked. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
16 |
32,352 |
09-21-2012, 12:55 PM |
|
|
Thread: Debian shadowfile and hashcat CUDA
Post: RE: Debian shadowfile and hashcat CUDA
No.
kevin33 -> ?l?l?l?l?l?d?d |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
25,443 |
09-21-2012, 12:55 PM |
|
|
Thread: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
Post: RE: Strange possible bug with IPB -m 2811
I doubt its a bug. Its possible that its just to fast, so you dont see first ?1 x 4. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
15,570 |
09-21-2012, 12:57 PM |
|
|
Thread: IKE Preshared Key from Aggressive Mode VPNs
Post: RE: IKE Preshared Key from Aggressive Mode VPNs
Indeed I did. I just finished HMAC-SHA256 today so it only a small step to HMAC-SHA1 :) |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
16 |
53,249 |
09-21-2012, 11:44 PM |
|
|
Thread: IKE Preshared Key from Aggressive Mode VPNs
Post: RE: IKE Preshared Key from Aggressive Mode VPNs
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
16 |
53,249 |
09-22-2012, 11:08 AM |
|
|
Thread: Usage of --increment-min ?
Post: RE: Usage of --increment-min ?
I can reproduce this bug. Thanks for reporting! |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
11,255 |
09-22-2012, 11:15 AM |