|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author
[asc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: 4 should append current word to the memory
Post: RE: 4 should append current word to the memory
| No its exactly working as I wanted it to and how I understood it. You sure you can not do what you want to this with this variant? |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
2 |
6,495 |
01-04-2013, 11:37 AM |
| |
|
Thread: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
Post: RE: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
| Something is strange with that reports. See when I tried to execute your cmd I get:
Quote:
--
root@ht:~/oclHashcat# ./oclHashcat-plus64.bin --session=three -a 3 -m 0 -1 '?d?u?l?s?h?D?F?R' g2 '?1'
... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,231 |
01-04-2013, 11:41 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
Post: RE: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
| Found the problem and solved it. The question is now, is it worth a new release? Maybe silent one? |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
22 |
40,101 |
01-04-2013, 05:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Bug using markov chains?
Post: RE: Bug using markov chains?
| Thanks for information. Thread closed. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
12,276 |
01-04-2013, 05:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 15 chars limitation
Post: RE: 15 chars limitation
| There is plenty of discussion about this on this forum, just use search please. There is currently no plan to change this. But never say never :) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
46 |
87,742 |
01-04-2013, 05:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: HELP, oclHashcat-plus 0.12 ERROR: cuMemcpyDtoH() 700
Post: RE: HELP, oclHashcat-plus 0.12 ERROR: cuMemcpyDto...
| are you on 32-bit xp as well? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
20 |
27,494 |
01-04-2013, 05:23 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Can´t get all gpus work
Post: RE: Can´t get all gpus work
| Yes, the v0.09 had export of DISPLAY built-in. So go to you example.sh and add
export DISPLAY=:0
before the ./oclHashcat-plus line |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
9 |
17,420 |
01-04-2013, 05:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Questions about the new restore feature
Post: RE: Questions about the new restore feature
|
mastercracker Wrote: (01-05-2013, 06:51 AM)
--
1) Under Windows environment, you can stop by doing "q" or "CTRL-C" but does it save the progress if you directly close the DOS window?
--
Yes you can... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
1 |
4,990 |
01-05-2013, 01:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 15 chars limitation
Post: RE: 15 chars limitation
| I doubt its that high, otherwise I would have added it already :) I guess its the opposite, nearly nothing. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
46 |
87,742 |
01-05-2013, 01:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 and oclHashcat-lite v0.11
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus v0.10 and oclHashcat-lite v0.1...
|
pragmatic Wrote: (01-05-2013, 11:47 AM)
--
Any particular feature/improvement that you are seeing or expecting from the next catalyst driver? Have you seen good things from the 12.11 beta?
--
No bu... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Announcements
|
36 |
85,157 |
01-05-2013, 01:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhascat64 has stopped to work ...
Post: RE: oclhascat64 has stopped to work ...
| Its clear for me now. That issue is known. I was unable to fix it before release because of the time bomb pressure. Thanks for report. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
10,865 |
01-05-2013, 01:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
Post: RE: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
| OK cool, I can reproduce with this:
./oclHashcat-plus64.bin --gpu-loops 1024 -n 800 --remove -m 2811 uncracked.txt -o cracked.txt -a 3 -1 ?l?d?s?u?h?F?R?D
Looks not to complicated. Thanks for report... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,231 |
01-05-2013, 01:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
Post: RE: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
| OK, code fixed. This bug was in the shared code so it is inside oclHashcat-lite as well.
@ Beta tester please confirm if its fixed. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,231 |
01-05-2013, 02:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.10-rc3-12.8
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus-0.10-rc3-12.8
| The lots-of-wordlists bug is fixed in b2 |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
12 |
11,858 |
01-05-2013, 09:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhascat64 has stopped to work ...
Post: RE: oclhascat64 has stopped to work ...
| Just wanted to inform you that the bug is fixed in beta and will be fixed in next release version. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
10,865 |
01-05-2013, 10:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: no faster WPA2 cracking?
Post: RE: no faster WPA2 cracking?
| It does not work for WPA. And as I said in the presentation I discovered this in early 2011. All oclHashcat versions already use it in these hashmodes that are compatible. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
7 |
16,161 |
01-06-2013, 03:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: fgets-sse2 v0.01 released
Post: fgets-sse2 v0.01 released
| Hey Guys,
fast loading a dictionary is an important part in a password cracker and the use of fgets(3) is not perfectly suited for high performance textfile parsing.
Here is my SSE2 accelerated ... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
6 |
17,371 |
01-06-2013, 08:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: 15 chars limitation
Post: RE: 15 chars limitation
| I think there is a misunderstanding. The performance increase based on the limitation is for fast hashes only. WPA and other slow algorithms are not affected. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
46 |
87,742 |
01-07-2013, 11:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Sha1(user:pass) decryption
Post: RE: Sha1(user:pass) decryption
| This mode is nearly supported. Try with -m 121.
Make sure your attack mode will only product upper-case passwords. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
6,889 |
01-08-2013, 11:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Passwords With spaces
Post: RE: Passwords With spaces
| All your words have been rejected by the rules so that it created 0 keyspace. Try again without -k : |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
9,741 |
01-08-2013, 11:17 AM |
