|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author
[asc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: maskprocessor v0.69
Post: maskprocessor v0.69
| Hey Guys,
just wanted to inform you I've updated the maskprocessor to version 0.69. This version works as the old one except that it has a new Parameter -q which enables you to control the number o... |
|
atom |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
1 |
7,445 |
02-23-2013, 10:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: SHA1 underscore salted ?
Post: RE: SHA1 underscore salted ?
| you mean a username that ends with a : ? |
|
atom |
General Help
|
9 |
15,120 |
02-27-2013, 10:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuMemAlloc() 1 with GTX TITAN
Post: RE: ERROR: cuMemAlloc() 1 with GTX TITAN
| Maybe, but there is no updated SDK available. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
14,002 |
03-01-2013, 10:20 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
Post: RE: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
| I am adding WPA/WPA2 and once its done I will release new version |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
22 |
40,101 |
03-03-2013, 08:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat 0.43 rc3
Post: hashcat 0.43 rc3
| hey beta-testers,
for those who havent seen it, hashcat v0.43 is in release candidate. i will release in a few days (or less). please try to do some last minute checks.
--
atom |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,238 |
03-06-2013, 12:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
Post: RE: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
22 |
40,101 |
03-06-2013, 12:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Error! Using 8 bit Number bruteforce crack !
Post: RE: Error! Using 8 bit Number bruteforce crack ...
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
23,941 |
03-06-2013, 12:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat 0.43 rc3
Post: RE: hashcat 0.43 rc3
| you already found something :) |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,238 |
03-06-2013, 02:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: version 0.13 still broken for Nvidia on Linux 32bit
Post: RE: version 0.13 still broken for Nvidia on Linux ...
| its already fixed in beta |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
6,342 |
03-06-2013, 11:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: No NVidia compatible platform found
Post: RE: No NVidia compatible platform found
| Maybe you are on 32 bit? The example uses 64 bit. If you are on 32 bit you have to edit the .sh File |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
9 |
26,686 |
03-07-2013, 01:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Slight wiki issue
Post: RE: Slight wiki issue
| OK, nice find. Should be fixed. Please test. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
2 |
5,983 |
03-07-2013, 01:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: version 0.13 still broken for Nvidia on Linux 32bit
Post: RE: version 0.13 still broken for Nvidia on Linux ...
| I will release it once I've implemented NetNTLMv1 and NetNTLMv2 into oclHashcat-plus.
For a workaround you just need to switch to a 64 bit OS. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
6,342 |
03-07-2013, 01:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat v0.43
Post: hashcat v0.43
| * changes v0.42-> v0.43:
Download here: https://hashcat.net/hashcat/
Release with lots of new algorithms especially for pentesters:
WPA/WPA2
Password Safe
IKE-PSK
NetNTLMv1 / NetNTLMv2
... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Announcements
|
12 |
36,477 |
03-07-2013, 02:31 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Brute-force SHA1 not accepting command
Post: RE: Brute-force SHA1 not accepting command
| No it is as mastercracker said. You need to add your salt to the hash in the stated format and then add a mask. See here how to configure it: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=mask_attack |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
12,527 |
03-08-2013, 11:43 AM |
| |
|
Thread: No NVidia compatible platform found
Post: RE: No NVidia compatible platform found
| usually not, but you should try to make that clear. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
9 |
26,686 |
03-08-2013, 11:46 AM |
| |
|
Thread: 15 chars limitation
Post: RE: 15 chars limitation
| If you just want to check the remaining 1002313 you can use hashcat CPU. It supports WPA up to length 64 in latest version. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
46 |
87,742 |
03-10-2013, 01:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: HashcatGUI v0.27 Released
Post: RE: HashcatGUI v0.27 Released
| Thanks Blandy, you really need to port this to linux :) |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
6 |
20,061 |
03-10-2013, 01:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: How does 15 character limitation help in a speed up?
Post: RE: How does 15 character limitation help in a spe...
| The main optimization idea bases on the fact that we have W[5] - W[13] (in MD5) set to zero. If its zero there is no need to add the secret key to the intermediate digest because X + 0 = X. For each s... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
6 |
15,131 |
03-10-2013, 01:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ERROR: cuLaunchKernel() 999
Post: RE: ERROR: cuLaunchKernel() 999
| well i dont like to release just because of 1 bugfix. however it is a major bug, so maybe i will release sooner. have to think about |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
27 |
48,970 |
03-11-2013, 10:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Envrionment Variables in Linux?
Post: RE: Envrionment Variables in Linux?
| Also write permission to the directory where the hashcat binary is installed (potfile, eula.accepted). |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
7,993 |
03-12-2013, 04:59 PM |
