|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author
[asc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Generating random strings
Post: RE: Generating random strings
| No, max. length 55 (and 32 for stdin, which you'd need here). |
|
atom |
General Help
|
1 |
4,086 |
05-30-2016, 10:04 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat for bitlocker
Post: RE: hashcat for bitlocker
| We need more detailed information how bitlocker algorithms looks like, how hashes (or whatever we use here as alternative) are extracted and how we can verify the results. After that, we can add it to... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
9,794 |
05-30-2016, 10:08 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Best approach for [capitalised word] [capitalised word] [1 to 99]
Post: RE: Best approach for [capitalised word] [capitali...
| Use combinator.bin from hashcat-utils to do the combinato part, pipe the results to hashcat using its stdin feature, add rules for the digits and the capitalize part |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
4,956 |
05-30-2016, 10:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX1080 Founders Edition - hashcat-3.00-beta-40 benchmarks
Post: RE: GTX1080 Founders Edition - hashcat-3.00-beta-4...
| ^ check those, it's what you wanted to see :) |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
15 |
22,534 |
05-31-2016, 12:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX1080 Founders Edition - hashcat-3.00-beta-40 benchmarks
Post: RE: GTX1080 Founders Edition - hashcat-3.00-beta-4...
|
KT819GM Wrote: (05-31-2016, 09:47 PM)
--
Atom, can you explain in short, why cards like HD6990 so shitty in (descrypt, DES(Unix), Traditional DES) comparing to this card?
--
I'd need to rewrite it ... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
15 |
22,534 |
06-01-2016, 11:05 AM |
| |
|
Thread: caching segment, please wait ...
Post: RE: caching segment, please wait ...
| Please switch to hashcat 3.00 beta, hashcat 2.xx (even if still in release mode) no longer supported. Things change soon. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
4,509 |
06-01-2016, 11:06 AM |
| |
|
Thread: GTX 1080 Founder's Edition Build
Post: RE: GTX 1080 Founder's Edition Build
| Not sure what you're expecting from us |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
10 |
16,367 |
06-01-2016, 11:08 AM |
| |
|
Thread: SHA1 and UTF8
Post: RE: SHA1 and UTF8
| https://www.rurapenthe.me/2013/09/cracking-hashes-with-other-language.html |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
12 |
18,352 |
06-01-2016, 11:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: hashcat for bitlocker
Post: RE: hashcat for bitlocker
| Sorry, not enough information |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
9,794 |
06-01-2016, 11:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: extrem slow cracking
Post: RE: extrem slow cracking
| https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#how_to_create_more_work_for_full_speed |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
4,206 |
06-03-2016, 10:02 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How build it from source? [Windows7]
Post: RE: How build it from source? [Windows7]
| cuda is deprecated, hashcat 3.00 uses opencl for nvidia gpu |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
6,333 |
06-03-2016, 05:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Question regarding benchmark output
Post: RE: Question regarding benchmark output
| In this case both, since md5crypt has exactly 1000 iterations. However what you see is the -u setting |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
6,058 |
06-03-2016, 10:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: SHA1 and UTF8
Post: RE: SHA1 and UTF8
| While thinking a bit on it, I think that's also the way to go if we would add real multibyte support into hashcat. Otherwise you'd end up in too many branches. We also need to keep the same length for... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
12 |
18,352 |
06-03-2016, 10:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
Post: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
| I'm talking about the binary distribution inside the .7z archives. I'm wondering if we can drop those binaries for 32 bit. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,676 |
06-04-2016, 12:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
Post: RE: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
|
royce Wrote: (06-04-2016, 02:50 PM)
--
Suggestion: Separate them out into their own .7z archives.
That way, you can track whether anyone is downloading them. If no one is using them, you can drop... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,676 |
06-06-2016, 11:13 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
Post: RE: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
|
undeath Wrote: (06-04-2016, 07:23 PM)
--
Is there any sane reason to run hashcat on a non-64bit system? Other than failing to install the correct OS arch I mean.
--
There's some algorithm that can ... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,676 |
06-06-2016, 11:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
Post: RE: Do we need to drop 32 bit binaries?
| There's also the problem that there's no nvml.dll for 32 bit on Windows. That makes hardware management on NVidia a bit problematic, but users could misinterpret it and falsly assume hardware manageme... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,676 |
06-06-2016, 11:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hardware Review Please
Post: RE: Hardware Review Please
|
atom |
Hardware
|
13 |
15,138 |
06-06-2016, 11:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Question regarding benchmark output
Post: RE: Question regarding benchmark output
| No, it's only for slow hashes |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
6,058 |
06-06-2016, 11:18 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hardware Review Please
Post: RE: Hardware Review Please
| I don't know, the whole configuration looks wrong for me, but I'm not that much of a hardware specialist.
CPU, RAM and Board is OK. Power is good but you may need to think about how you manage 2 of ... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
13 |
15,138 |
06-07-2016, 09:05 AM |
