|
Search Results
|
| Post |
Author
[asc]
|
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| Also note that this feature is kind of unique in the WPA/WPA2 cracking world. There's no other cracker (both commercial and non-commercial) that combines the packets in such a way that they produce at... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-08-2017, 09:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| Hehe, I guess in that case it will not take long to update it again, allowing it for combining of packets :) |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-09-2017, 10:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: WPA Rule based
Post: RE: WPA Rule based
| About rejected, please read this: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#what_means_rejected_in_the_status_view
The --restore works automatically, there's no need to use --... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,791 |
02-09-2017, 11:01 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Which step am I missing - DES-OFB Key
Post: RE: Which step am I missing - DES-OFB Key
| Yes, you can crack it with hashcat, but you need to patch the kernel.
I really love such home-cooked algorithms. They always do something stupid, so does this one. I didn't write a poc, but I'm prett... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
12,932 |
02-09-2017, 01:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: m02500.cl EXPLAIN NEEDED
Post: RE: m02500.cl EXPLAIN NEEDED
| Yeah a function or something |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
7 |
8,589 |
02-10-2017, 02:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: des key collision?
Post: RE: des key collision?
| Do you mean having 2 different keys that produce the same CT out of the same PT? Sure, that's possible: https://twitter.com/hashcat/status/775345537210019841 |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
5,486 |
02-10-2017, 02:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: m02500.cl EXPLAIN NEEDED
Post: RE: m02500.cl EXPLAIN NEEDED
| The thing is if you would have any experience in programming you wouldn't have said so. A function will not make it faster, it will make no difference at all. The compiler will recognize a fixed numbe... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
7 |
8,589 |
02-10-2017, 03:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
|
abdou99 Wrote: (02-10-2017, 02:29 PM)
--
If you are saying that both values: 0 and 1 are crackable
so what's the news?
value = 0 ==> 50% Crackable
value = 1 ==> 100% Crackable
is that what are ... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-10-2017, 03:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: des key collision?
Post: RE: des key collision?
| Yeah right, it's 3DES, but the same would occur to DES, just with less "collisions". I just used that example because it was the only one I had. I was able to increase the speed of the BF because I co... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
5,486 |
02-10-2017, 05:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: des key collision?
Post: RE: des key collision?
| Yes, you need to go through all of it, and that's your problem because you can't search a 2^112 bit keyspace no matter how fast the kernel is |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
5,486 |
02-10-2017, 07:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Please vote
Post: Please vote
| I can increase rule-based attack speed but for the price of a decreased brute-force attack speed.
I can not guarantee the numbers, but after the change all modes will have the same speed.
The speed... |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
9 |
11,209 |
02-10-2017, 07:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Which step am I missing - DES-OFB Key
Post: RE: Which step am I missing - DES-OFB Key
| I think it's mostly copy / paste of the -m 14000 |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
12,932 |
02-10-2017, 07:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Please vote
Post: RE: Please vote
| For those haven't seen it: There's a voting system on top of this thread |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
9 |
11,209 |
02-10-2017, 08:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Please vote
Post: RE: Please vote
| OK, poll is closed now. Bad thing is that I've found in the meanwhile that the idea didn't work out, so everything will stay as-is :) |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
9 |
11,209 |
02-11-2017, 11:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: What's wrong with AMD & RAR3-HP
Post: RE: What's wrong with AMD & RAR3-HP
| This is another episode of the great AMD OpenCL runtime! I've just tested it locally with my NV GTX1080 and AMD RX480 with the same hashcat version (v3.30-157):
NV:
Quote:
--
$RAR3$*0*b14426c0cf7c9... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
9,372 |
02-13-2017, 11:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: m02500.cl EXPLAIN NEEDED
Post: RE: m02500.cl EXPLAIN NEEDED
| It's not hard to understand if you know OpenCL in detail, Crypto schemes like PBKDF2 and how to optimize it as an attacker, HMAC and how to optimize it as an attacker, SHA1 and how to optimize it as a... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
7 |
8,589 |
02-13-2017, 11:31 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Truecrypt Issues
Post: RE: Truecrypt Issues
| If this is not a boot device it makes not sense to attack it with 624x, so why should you. It will just increase the time. For the other three modes 6213, 6223 and 6233: Just run them in a sequence |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,793 |
02-13-2017, 11:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: What's wrong with AMD & RAR3-HP
Post: RE: What's wrong with AMD & RAR3-HP
| I've found a workaround using a volatile variable, but I can't say how much it dropped the performance because the value before was wrong because of that OpenCL runtime error. Anyway, it should work o... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
9,372 |
02-13-2017, 12:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: m02500.cl EXPLAIN NEEDED
Post: RE: m02500.cl EXPLAIN NEEDED
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
7 |
8,589 |
02-13-2017, 12:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why doesn't the restore point update with BCrypt hashes?
Post: RE: Why doesn't the restore point update with BCry...
| Not a bug, your wordlist is too small (198172 candidates), there's simply no restore checkpoint possible with it. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
6,891 |
02-13-2017, 02:59 PM |
