|
Search Results
|
| Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: How to write these rules?
Post: RE: How to write these rules?
| That's not possible to do with rules, because rules have no influence on picking the right words in the wordlist. Rules are made however to add single characters. So what you have to do is to create t... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
1,634 |
01-10-2019, 05:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: how to write this rule? (help)
Post: RE: how to write this rule? (help)
|
Quote:
--
Started with v3, hashcat has some limitations in using of multiple rules.
--
Not sure what you mean. There's no such limitation! |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
5,326 |
12-27-2016, 11:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: How to...
Post: RE: How to...
| You first need to install an OpenCL runtime for your CPU. This is not part of hashcat. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
2 |
4,088 |
11-06-2016, 03:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: How To: Hashcat 3.0 on a 32-bit Linux VM
Post: RE: How To: Hashcat 3.0 on a 32-bit Linux VM
| Thanks! About that one error, you should post it to the pocl project. They are pretty good and fast in fixing their own bugs, if it is. Also possible it's a LLVM problem. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
16,920 |
07-05-2016, 08:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: howto use stats processor with oclHashcat+ v0.8?
Post: RE: howto use stats processor with oclHashcat+ v0....
|
ntk Wrote: (07-13-2012, 11:36 PM)
--
1. why when I feed in large amount of combinations the status window comes up without my involvement?
--
because it always does each 10 seconds or so plus when ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
17 |
30,284 |
07-14-2012, 08:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: howto use stats processor with oclHashcat+ v0.8?
Post: RE: howto use stats processor with oclHashcat+ v0....
| something is wrong with your system. cracked fine with your command:
Quote:
--
root@sf:~/oclHashcat# /root/maskprocessor-0.68/mp64.bin -1 ?d ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 | ./oclHashcat-plus64.bin -m 2500 x.hc... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
17 |
30,284 |
07-15-2012, 12:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: howto use stats processor with oclHashcat+ v0.8?
Post: RE: howto use stats processor with oclHashcat+ v0....
| 0.08 works fine, too:
Quote:
--
root@sf:~/xy/oclHashcat-plus-0.08# /root/maskprocessor-0.68/mp64.bin -1 ?d ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 | sudo ./oclHashcat-plus64.bin -m 2500 x.hccap
oclHashcat-plus v0.08 by ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
17 |
30,284 |
07-16-2012, 10:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: HP SWITCH hash
Post: RE: HP SWITCH hash
| What algorithm are they using?
Can you provide an example hash PLUS the valid plaintext password for that hash. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
1 |
5,318 |
02-03-2014, 01:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: htpasswd decrypt ?
Post: RE: htpasswd decrypt ?
| I think htaccess supports many modes, but usually its -m 1500 but maybe you want to use --username as well |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
43,642 |
03-26-2014, 09:57 AM |
| |
|
Thread: htpasswd decrypt ?
Post: RE: htpasswd decrypt ?
| Your command is fine, 815 kH/s is pretty good for a GTX570 against APR. |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
43,642 |
03-26-2014, 07:15 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Huge date list (multi-language).
Post: RE: Huge date list (multi-language).
| Using combinator.bin from hashcat-utils you can generate the missing date files |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
3 |
9,048 |
10-29-2012, 10:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Huge speed drop with Amd GPU Pro
Post: RE: Huge speed drop with Amd GPU Pro
| Please post full commandline |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
6,179 |
12-18-2016, 05:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Huge speed drop with Amd GPU Pro
Post: RE: Huge speed drop with Amd GPU Pro
| Yes, I can reproduce the same behaviour. Mask is fine, but rule-based dropped from ~600MH/s to ~300MH/s.
Also the OpenCL JIT compiler segfaults while compiling the scrypt kernel. That errors occur in... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
6,179 |
12-18-2016, 11:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: HW.Monitor never > 70% GPU
Post: RE: HW.Monitor never > 70% GPU
| this heavily depends on the algorithm used. in case of highly iterated one you have a lot of memory swapping to be done, so the ALU cannot be held busy. i will try to improve it, but its unrealistic t... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
1 |
5,226 |
01-05-2012, 10:33 AM |
| |
|
Thread: HWMon.GPU status problem
Post: RE: HWMon.GPU status problem
| There is no link possible between a CUDA and an NVAPI device (no unique ID). Therefore the only possibility to match them is by using some fuzzy logic which can of course fail. Best way to not run int... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
1 |
4,555 |
07-03-2013, 02:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hybrid attack and -s value
Post: RE: Hybrid attack and -s value
| in -a0 (with or without rules), -a1 and -a6 where the dictionary is used as base it's correct, I can confirm. Oh, there is an exception for oversized lines. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
6,482 |
02-25-2014, 07:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: hybrid attack much slower in newer version of hashcat??
Post: RE: hybrid attack much slower in newer version of ...
| You just need to write the attack a bit different, like this:
./hashcat --stdout -a 6 small_wordlist.txt ?a?a | ./hashcat -m2500 bla.hccapx -w 3 --status --status-timer 10 |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
3,587 |
03-08-2017, 12:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hybrid Attack slow Dict + Mask
Post: RE: Hybrid Attack slow Dict + Mask
| preparing wordlist wont help here, the problem is that the dictionary is to small. you need a bigger dictionary. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
8,691 |
09-05-2013, 02:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Hybrid attack splitting
Post: RE: Hybrid attack splitting
| hashcat64.exe -a 7 test.hash ?l?l?l?l?l smallDict.txt --stdout -o new.txt
then use -a0 new.txt instead
you will have a larger --keyspace range to operate and distribute |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
4,187 |
10-01-2017, 11:29 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary
Post: RE: Hybrid attack using rules on a dictionary
| you can do:
Quote:
--
hashcat64 -a 6 dict.txt ?a?a -i --stdout | hashcat64 -m 0 -a 0 -r .\rules\dive.rule hashes.txt
--
|
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
14,669 |
12-02-2016, 03:46 PM |
