Search Results
|
Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: IPB2 + 4670
Post: RE: IPB2 + 4670
yes the ATI RV730 series cards are somehow broken with opencl. i can not fix this since i do not have access to such a card for debugging. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
9,947 |
01-26-2012, 07:14 AM |
|
|
Thread: IPB2 + 4670
Post: RE: IPB2 + 4670
as i said, i can not debug it since i do not have such a card for test |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
9,947 |
01-26-2012, 06:17 PM |
|
|
Thread: IPB2 md5(md5($salt).md5($pass)) issue?
Post: RE: IPB2 md5(md5($salt).md5($pass)) issue?
I guess its all about the multihash -m 2611, -m 2711 and -m 2811 bug in AMD catalyst for < hd77xx. If it works fine on single hashes all you can do is to pray to AMD catalyst coder to fix this issue. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
30,292 |
05-16-2012, 10:40 AM |
|
|
Thread: IPB2 md5(md5($salt).md5($pass)) issue?
Post: RE: IPB2 md5(md5($salt).md5($pass)) issue?
We just wait for an AMD driver fix |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
13 |
30,292 |
05-21-2012, 06:29 PM |
|
|
Thread: Is 4way handshake the problem?
Post: RE: Is 4way handshake the problem?
Sounds like he did not select the WPA algorihm |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
14,775 |
11-16-2012, 09:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: Is 4way handshake the problem?
Post: RE: Is 4way handshake the problem?
john99 Wrote: (11-19-2012, 07:59 PM)
--
./cudaHashcat-plus32bin: error while loading shared libraries. libcuda.so.1: cannot open shared object file: No such file of directory
--
Driver installation... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
14,775 |
11-20-2012, 10:48 AM |
|
|
Thread: Is a setup with 128 GPUs possible?
Post: RE: Is a setup with 128 GPUs possible?
I'm not aware of a single board with that much pci-express slots. But at the time when VCL was still working it was faking to the OpenCL client that it has X numbers of OpenCL capable devices so if yo... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
3 |
7,941 |
04-14-2014, 06:40 PM |
|
|
Thread: Is AMD FX-9590 worth it to get or just get a FX-8350?
Post: RE: Is AMD FX-9590 worth it to get or just get a F...
IMO, don't buy AMD CPU, buy Intel. |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
5 |
7,032 |
09-01-2016, 07:09 AM |
|
|
Thread: Is AMD FX-9590 worth it to get or just get a FX-8350?
Post: RE: Is AMD FX-9590 worth it to get or just get a F...
That's your decision. I just know that cheap = expensive, especially when it comes to password cracking. |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
5 |
7,032 |
09-01-2016, 04:26 PM |
|
|
Thread: Is anyone mining IMDb?
Post: RE: Is anyone mining IMDb?
This is cool stuff, thanks |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
7 |
17,168 |
06-26-2014, 01:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: is anyone run a benchmark with gtx1060 in hashcat v3.0?
Post: RE: is anyone run a benchmark with gtx1060 in hash...
No, except for SCRYPT based algorithms, the gpu ram doesn't matter when it comes to raw performance. |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
12 |
46,633 |
06-30-2017, 09:06 AM |
|
|
Thread: Is cracking WPA/TKIP faster than WPA2/AES?
Post: RE: Is cracking WPA/TKIP faster than WPA2/AES?
Wait, oclHashcat-plus is not cracking the cipherstream, it's cracking the handshake. Therefore, it makes no difference in terms of speed if it's WPA1 or WPA2. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
6 |
22,175 |
08-08-2013, 06:18 AM |
|
|
Thread: Is cracking WPA/TKIP faster than WPA2/AES?
Post: RE: Is cracking WPA/TKIP faster than WPA2/AES?
The slow PBKDF2 part is same for both, which is why they have the same speed. After that, WPA1 uses MD5 while WPA2 uses SHA1 but thats so fast compared to the slow part that you wont see a difference. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
6 |
22,175 |
08-12-2013, 03:07 PM |
|
|
Thread: Is CUDA 6 going to help the CUDA hashcats?
Post: RE: Is CUDA 6 going to help the CUDA hashcats?
No, CUDA 6 is aimed for GPU beginners. You don't need to understand some basic concepts and can simply start coding. But nothing that helps us in terms of performance. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
1 |
4,904 |
11-19-2013, 10:14 AM |
|
|
Thread: is descrypt slow after ocl v1.31?
Post: RE: is descrypt slow after ocl v1.31?
I'm testing with the following system:
Quote:
--
Device #1: GeForce GTX 980, 4095MB, 1215Mhz, 16MCU
Device #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 2047MB, 1110Mhz, 5MCU
Device #3: GeForce GTX 560 Ti, 1023MB, ... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
9,831 |
04-21-2015, 03:46 PM |
|
|
Thread: is descrypt slow after ocl v1.31?
Post: RE: is descrypt slow after ocl v1.31?
Btw, my gutfeeling tells me this could be maybe somehow related to password length (and rejection). Try with a wordlist where no word has the length > 8 |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
9,831 |
04-21-2015, 03:59 PM |
|
|
Thread: is descrypt slow after ocl v1.31?
Post: RE: is descrypt slow after ocl v1.31?
I've changed rejection handling for v1.36 as it was with v1.31. It's clearly superior. You should test with latest beta version |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
9,831 |
04-22-2015, 12:47 PM |
|
|
Thread: Is dictionary file masking being removed?
Post: RE: Is dictionary file masking being removed?
No it should work. Probably related to refactoring, please open a github issue otherwise it's forgotten. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,756 |
09-27-2016, 03:02 PM |
|
|
Thread: Is hashcat able to utilize the cores in a Xeon PHI ?
Post: RE: Is hashcat able to utilize the cores in a Xeon...
There's a limit to 128 devices per instance, but I can simply increase this in the sourcecode without the need of changing anything else. This is mostly related to memory allocations.
It should be ... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
2 |
3,274 |
07-28-2017, 01:24 PM |
|
|
Thread: is hashcat support an ordinary exe\cmd file?
Post: RE: is hashcat support an ordinary exe\cmd file?
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,304 |
06-20-2017, 09:58 AM |