Search Results
|
Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Is it a md5 colision ?
Post: RE: Is it a md5 colision ?
Note for me:
Code:
--
root@sf:~/hashcat-0.45# ./hashcat-cliXOP.bin hash dict
Initializing hashcat v0.45 by atom with 8 threads and 32mb segment-size...
Added hashes from file hash: 1 (1 salts)
Act... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
15 |
33,320 |
04-12-2013, 08:59 PM |
|
|
Thread: Is it a md5 colision ?
Post: RE: Is it a md5 colision ?
I agree, nice testing philsmd |
|
atom |
General Help
|
15 |
33,320 |
04-15-2013, 10:01 AM |
|
|
Thread: Is it a md5 colision ?
Post: RE: Is it a md5 colision ?
No, you can not. But I've seen lots of hashlist examples where admins salting hashes with 0-bytes. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
15 |
33,320 |
04-19-2013, 10:47 AM |
|
|
Thread: Is it better to use princeprocessor rather than using Hashcat alone?
Post: RE: Is it better to use princeprocessor rather tha...
There's no difference, performance-wise |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
7 |
7,903 |
03-27-2017, 02:01 PM |
|
|
Thread: Is it better to use princeprocessor rather than using Hashcat alone?
Post: RE: Is it better to use princeprocessor rather tha...
I think you're confusing what we mean with "performance". That is the number of passwords candidates that are generated in a specific time. It has no relation in how likely such a guess is. That's why... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
7 |
7,903 |
03-27-2017, 03:30 PM |
|
|
Thread: Is it better to use princeprocessor rather than using Hashcat alone?
Post: RE: Is it better to use princeprocessor rather tha...
I think royce explained it pretty well. In real life, forensics, pentester and others that do hash cracking as part of their job have no time to attend the process of hash cracking. Even less, they ha... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
7 |
7,903 |
03-28-2017, 10:52 AM |
|
|
Thread: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
Post: RE: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
Yeah there have been no changes. Any results @ VM? |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
22 |
40,101 |
01-04-2013, 11:27 AM |
|
|
Thread: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
Post: RE: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
Found the problem and solved it. The question is now, is it worth a new release? Maybe silent one? |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
22 |
40,101 |
01-04-2013, 05:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
Post: RE: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
WPA/WPA2 support isnt built in yet |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
22 |
40,101 |
02-09-2013, 06:37 PM |
|
|
Thread: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
Post: RE: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
22 |
40,101 |
02-13-2013, 01:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
Post: RE: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
I am adding WPA/WPA2 and once its done I will release new version |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
22 |
40,101 |
03-03-2013, 08:22 AM |
|
|
Thread: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
Post: RE: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
22 |
40,101 |
03-06-2013, 12:03 PM |
|
|
Thread: Is it worth updating Catalyst from 11.5 to 11.8?
Post: RE: Is it worth updating Catalyst from 11.5 to 11....
on windows, speed does not change. you can upgrade but dont expect any change.
on linux, 11.8 creates 100% CPU load per GPU per core and this reduces performance a lot. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
2 |
7,881 |
09-16-2011, 01:44 PM |
|
|
Thread: Is it worth updating Catalyst from 11.5 to 11.8?
Post: RE: Is it worth updating Catalyst from 11.5 to 11....
for more details, see here: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=oclhashcat_catalyst_forceware |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
2 |
7,881 |
10-24-2011, 12:47 PM |
|
|
Thread: Is my computer good
Post: RE: Is my computer good
Install OpenCL runtime then, see docs/readme.txt for details |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
4 |
5,174 |
03-18-2017, 04:34 PM |
|
|
Thread: Is my test results normal?(oclhashcat-plus for truecrypt ,2*gtx690)
Post: RE: Is my test results normal?(oclhashcat-plu...
AMD has both more raw power and a the better integer instruction set (floating-point doesn't matter) and thus it's better for crypto, since crypto only uses integer instructions. That's the reason why... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
10,588 |
08-29-2013, 09:21 AM |
|
|
Thread: Is oclHashcat support $RAR3$*1*?
Post: RE: Is oclHashcat support $RAR3$*1*?
Not yet, but it's planned. Just don't ask when. |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
13,806 |
03-23-2016, 12:43 PM |
|
|
Thread: Is SL3 Unlocking with Multihashing of SHA1($salt.$pass) ready?
Post: RE: Is SL3 Unlocking with Multihashing of SHA1($sa...
no, and it is not planned |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
4 |
13,679 |
03-26-2011, 08:20 PM |
|
|
Thread: Is SL3 Unlocking with Multihashing of SHA1($salt.$pass) ready?
Post: RE: Is SL3 Unlocking with Multihashing of SHA1($sa...
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
4 |
13,679 |
03-26-2011, 08:39 PM |
|
|
Thread: Is that possible to use PS3 for Sl3 Cracking ?
Post: RE: Is that possible to use PS3 for Sl3 Cracking ?
oclHashcat-lite does not support ps3 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
5 |
12,602 |
11-28-2011, 10:45 AM |