|
Search Results
|
| Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Linux: Amdgpupro 16.60
Post: RE: Linux: Amdgpupro 16.60
| I've tried on my RX480, it's possible they fixed it only for newer GPU generations. Also make sure to use latest beta for testing from https://hashcat.net/beta/ or github master version. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
8 |
9,514 |
06-30-2017, 04:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: lite can not find all of the memory of HD6950 (1G)
Post: RE: lite can not find all of the memory of HD6950 ...
| oclHashcat-plus is using specials tactics... :) I think I can port it to oclHashcat-lite but why would one need that GPU memory on a kernel with no memory requirements... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
2 |
6,604 |
05-23-2012, 04:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: lite-0.08 outdated and lite-0.13 cant get along with my AMD driver
Post: RE: lite-0.08 outdated and lite-0.13 cant get alon...
| Just install cat 12.8 and you will be fine |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
8 |
16,928 |
01-01-2013, 05:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: lite-0.08 outdated and lite-0.13 cant get along with my AMD driver
Post: RE: lite-0.08 outdated and lite-0.13 cant get alon...
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
8 |
16,928 |
01-02-2013, 12:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: litecoin wallet
Post: RE: litecoin wallet
| If you really want the algorithm added I suggest to open a trac ticket for it. Chances are much higher we implement it then. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
9,245 |
01-29-2014, 11:02 AM |
| |
|
Thread: LM hash support for OCLHC
Post: RE: LM hash support for OCLHC
| LM will be added next version! :) |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
31 |
77,621 |
02-01-2012, 11:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: LM hash support for OCLHC
Post: RE: LM hash support for OCLHC
| ofc mastercracker.. oclHashcat-lite is like a formula 1 racing car. its good for experience and then backport stuff to oclHashcat-plus |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
31 |
77,621 |
02-04-2012, 09:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: LM hash support for OCLHC
Post: RE: LM hash support for OCLHC
|
Mem5 Wrote: (02-05-2012, 09:11 PM)
--
atom do you plan an update for LM for hashcat (cpu) ?
--
no, use RT on CPU |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
31 |
77,621 |
02-06-2012, 10:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: LM hash support for OCLHC
Post: RE: LM hash support for OCLHC
|
fatalx Wrote: (02-08-2012, 02:11 AM)
--
What card are you using that it will only take 200 minutes?
I'm running a 5670 and it says 23 hours, and the speed is 88400k/s.
NTLM runs at 2200M/s. Is this... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
31 |
77,621 |
02-08-2012, 11:08 AM |
| |
|
Thread: LM hash support for OCLHC
Post: RE: LM hash support for OCLHC
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
31 |
77,621 |
05-08-2012, 04:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: LM Hashes
Post: RE: LM Hashes
| There's toggle rules in rules folder which help you find correct case |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
11 |
5,710 |
08-22-2019, 11:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: load/save from/to http-server
Post: RE: load/save from/to http-server
| nice idea but as long as you can do it with external commands there is no real need for it. also, from an architectonic view its somehow strange to add a http client to a password cracker. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
3 |
9,189 |
10-10-2010, 11:02 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Loads Of Requests !
Post: RE: Loads Of Requests !
| wow man, this post rocks. much thanks for putting this all together. it makes it much more easy for me to keep track of all the requests. i will quote each request next:
Quote:
--
Increment.
-... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
9 |
18,949 |
11-28-2011, 04:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Loads Of Requests !
Post: RE: Loads Of Requests !
| perfect! no more to say :) |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
9 |
18,949 |
11-29-2011, 10:55 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Loads Of Requests !
Post: RE: Loads Of Requests !
| - mark the "q" thing as Pending pls, i did not yet accepted it.
- correct the application wording pls, "maskprocessor" (all lower), "oclHashcat-plus"
- i am thinking about adding the accepted suggest... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
9 |
18,949 |
11-29-2011, 05:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Loads Of Requests !
Post: RE: Loads Of Requests !
| yes, thanks. will close that thread to avoid confusion. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
9 |
18,949 |
11-30-2011, 11:56 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Loads Of Requests !
Post: RE: Loads Of Requests !
| Just one update. I will reject "Insist on confirmation when user press “q†to quit" after thinking about it again. I think its good as it is. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
9 |
18,949 |
01-16-2012, 12:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Locating bottleneck in Brain
Post: RE: Locating bottleneck in Brain
| A good rule of thumb is that if you have more than 500kH/s of total performance (all OpenCL devices), hashcat brain (even running on a very fast system) will create a bottleneck. Another rule to add i... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
4,570 |
02-13-2019, 05:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Locating bottleneck in Brain
Post: RE: Locating bottleneck in Brain
| Yes, per salt. But salts are always known, otherwise the original authentication system can not do its work either. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
4,570 |
02-15-2019, 04:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Location of TrueCrypt Hidden OS Header
Post: RE: Location of TrueCrypt Hidden OS Header
| As said in the description, a hidden OS requires another partition on the disc. It's probably the first 512 byte of that second partition or the 512 byte of sector 62 of that disc. Should be easy to f... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
7,597 |
07-15-2017, 01:01 PM |
