|
Search Results
|
| Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Massive help
Post: RE: Massive help
| Just lower the workload if it crashes your driver |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
10,692 |
08-29-2014, 11:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: match column
Post: RE: match column
| https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#how_can_i_show_previously_cracked_passwords_and_output_them_in_a_specific_format_eg_emailpassword |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
3,138 |
02-16-2017, 07:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Math Question !
Post: RE: Math Question !
| thanks for keeping the list up to date, helps much |
|
atom |
General Help
|
6 |
12,933 |
01-08-2012, 12:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Mathematical relation between number of GPUs and H/s
Post: RE: Mathematical relation between number of GPUs a...
| Yes, if the keyspace to search is large enough, it would be 10X.
Basically you can simply sum up all speeds, there's no loss due to parallelization. Hashcat can also handle devices of different ty... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
3,532 |
09-14-2016, 04:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Max combination result
Post: RE: Max combination result
| Your calculation is incorrect because ?s = 33, not 95
52*26*26*26*26*33*33 = 25 877 636 928 |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
4,467 |
06-02-2014, 11:55 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Max Pass Length using Wordlists
Post: RE: Max Pass Length using Wordlists
| Of course, just do not use -O |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
5,996 |
12-01-2017, 11:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Bottleneck, and my 31 character limit. Ideas?
Post: RE: Maximum length of 31? Why?
| If you use -a 3 (mask-attack) it will work because the limit with mask attack is 55.
Quote:
--
root@et:~/oclHashcat-1.36# ./oclHashcat64.bin -m 100 hash '8|7|9|4|2|10|6|11|12|1|0|5|13|3|14' -a 3... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
30 |
45,031 |
04-05-2015, 11:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: maybe bug again
Post: RE: maybe bug again
| awesome! nice catch again, tommie_c! it is a bug in the RULE_OP_REJECT_CONTAINS '%' rule.
the bug was the following:
it should do: reject the word unless it contains at least N instances of X
... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
2 |
6,572 |
03-14-2011, 10:49 AM |
| |
|
Thread: MBP not enough allocatable device-memory
Post: RE: MBP not enough allocatable device-memory
|
Quote:
--
- Device #2: Device does not provide enough allocatable device-memory to handle this attack
--
This kind of error is actually that you do not have enough (device) memory to handle scr... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
5,089 |
07-01-2016, 09:05 AM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 and the Diminishing Passwords Rule
Post: RE: MD5 and the Diminishing Passwords Rule
| Are you sure about that?
The clGetPlatformIDs() -1001 error is something that if you get it you will get it for both md5 or wpa. there is no difference. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
11,348 |
06-22-2012, 10:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 and the Diminishing Passwords Rule
Post: RE: MD5 and the Diminishing Passwords Rule
| Please send me the dictionary you are using. I have a suspect :) |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
11,348 |
06-23-2012, 11:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 and the Diminishing Passwords Rule
Post: RE: MD5 and the Diminishing Passwords Rule
| I can not reproduce it :( I even used a 32 bit version:
Quote:
--
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-plus-0.09# ./oclHashcat-plus32.bin --hash-type 2500 --rules-file Diminishing_Password.rule test.hccap passlist... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
9 |
11,348 |
06-26-2012, 11:56 AM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 and v3.00
Post: RE: MD5 and v3.00
| The reason is that it's not really slower, I just had to fix a number of bugs in the rule engine, which is executed on the GPU, but those fixes lead to a slower kernel. So yes, 2.01 has a faster rule-... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
19 |
21,398 |
07-04-2016, 01:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 and v3.00
Post: RE: MD5 and v3.00
| Straight wordlist with fast hashes like MD5? It's just a matter of seconds isn't it |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
19 |
21,398 |
07-05-2016, 08:06 AM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 and v3.00
Post: RE: MD5 and v3.00
|
Quote:
--
- pure bruteforcing : v3.00 is faster
- Straight wordlist (no rules) : v3.00 is faster
--
yes
Quote:
--
- wordists + rules : v2.01 is faster BUT buggy
--
yes, but only for ... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
19 |
21,398 |
07-06-2016, 08:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 and v3.00
Post: RE: MD5 and v3.00
|
Atlantis Wrote: (07-09-2016, 10:36 AM)
--
OK, I understood it. But why doesn't it work with fx8320?
--
You need an OpenCL runtime. The OpenCL runtime for fx8320 CPU is part of the AMD driver, but... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
19 |
21,398 |
07-09-2016, 08:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 and v3.00
Post: RE: MD5 and v3.00
|
atom |
hashcat
|
19 |
21,398 |
08-21-2016, 08:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 and v3.00
Post: RE: MD5 and v3.00
|
atom |
hashcat
|
19 |
21,398 |
08-22-2016, 02:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 crack with first chars known
Post: RE: MD5 crack with first chars known
| I'd go -m 20, that allows you to use all attack-modes |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
2,433 |
08-28-2017, 08:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: MD5 Crack with Salt
Post: RE: MD5 Crack with Salt
| root@ht:~/hashcat-0.40# cat hash
69c12c189531e95fc6b6b4191ce29220:dz
root@ht:~/hashcat-0.40# ./hashcat-cli64.bin -m 2 hash -a 3 --pw-min 4 ?d?d?d?d
69c12c189531e95fc6b6b4191ce29220:dz:0000
All hashe... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
9 |
59,391 |
05-07-2012, 04:34 PM |
