|
Search Results
|
| Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: New AMD 6990 - Information, opinions and experiences
Post: RE: New AMD 6990 - Information, opinions and exper...
| the keyspace has increased. max plaintext size is exactly (inclusive) 15. even on unicode algorithms like DCC and NTLM. in case its a salted algo (1 and 101), the salt can be of any size BUT the sum o... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
14 |
34,121 |
03-15-2011, 09:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New AMD 6990 - Information, opinions and experiences
Post: RE: New AMD 6990 - Information, opinions and exper...
| 0.26b does not support it but oclHashcat-lite will do |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
14 |
34,121 |
03-26-2011, 08:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New AMD 6990 - Information, opinions and experiences
Post: RE: New AMD 6990 - Information, opinions and exper...
|
atom |
Hardware
|
14 |
34,121 |
03-29-2011, 10:13 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New AMD 6990 - Information, opinions and experiences
Post: RE: New AMD 6990 - Information, opinions and exper...
|
atom |
Hardware
|
14 |
34,121 |
09-29-2011, 10:33 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New ATI driver ??
Post: RE: New ATI driver ??
| This is only for oclHashcat-lite - oclHashcat-plus will not work with hd7970 - you have to wait for new release. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
14 |
26,158 |
04-02-2012, 09:39 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New ATI driver ??
Post: RE: New ATI driver ??
| If 12.3 includes an OpenCL dll that comes from SDK 2.7 i would not wonder at all. They already said XP will be deprecated with the next SDK (which is 2.7). That means XP, with 12.3 or not, will be dep... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
14 |
26,158 |
04-02-2012, 04:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New ATI driver ??
Post: RE: New ATI driver ??
|
atom |
General Help
|
14 |
26,158 |
04-03-2012, 09:24 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New ATI driver ??
Post: RE: New ATI driver ??
| no new optimizations found |
|
atom |
General Help
|
14 |
26,158 |
04-04-2012, 09:34 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New ATI driver ??
Post: RE: New ATI driver ??
| No changes on MD4/MD5/SHA1/SHA256/SHA512 based algorithms but DES performance dropped by nearly 100% :( |
|
atom |
General Help
|
14 |
26,158 |
04-25-2012, 09:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New attack on WPA/WPA2 using PMKID
Post: RE: New attack on WPA/WPA2 using PMKID
|
Quote:
--
I guess, consumer grade hardware won't be attackable using this tool, because these simply do not perform PMKID caching (i guess). I did a quick test using an AVM Fritz!Box (popular model... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
187 |
1,293,346 |
08-08-2018, 11:16 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New attack on WPA/WPA2 using PMKID
Post: RE: New attack on WPA/WPA2 using PMKID
| Indeed, hcxdumptool doesn't work with my atheros (mini-pci):
[ 13.804884] ath5k: phy0: Atheros AR5414 chip found (MAC: 0xa5, PHY: 0x61)
However, my usb card works perfectly:
Bus 001 Device 002: I... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
187 |
1,293,346 |
08-08-2018, 11:55 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: RE: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
| Kernel Developer:
There's two changes you typically need to apply to your kernel.
1. Replace "salt_pos" with "SALT_POS"
2. Replace "digests_offset" with "DIGESTS_OFFSET"
That's it. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,762 |
09-29-2020, 04:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: RE: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
|
royce Wrote: (09-29-2020, 05:03 PM)
--
Wow, this is going to be a game-changer!
If feasible, one UX request: Please do what JtR does here and warn the user about any "calculatable" efficiency thresh... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,762 |
09-30-2020, 12:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: RE: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
|
Peanutbutter1 Wrote: (09-29-2020, 05:20 PM)
--
This is awesome. Is there any interest in a variation of this attack that, instead of using rules on each individual hash's associated hint, you can pro... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,762 |
09-30-2020, 12:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: RE: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
|
AndrewOnDev Wrote: (09-29-2020, 08:14 PM)
--
If this is not a correct place to report some issues/make suggestions then please let me know and I'll shut up :D
I noticed that this mode doesn't real... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,762 |
09-30-2020, 12:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: RE: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
|
KillerCube Wrote: (09-29-2020, 08:51 PM)
--
I think this new attack method is awesome and I would also like to be able to use something like
Code:
--
mypass,passtest,passguess:
--
Of course using... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,762 |
09-30-2020, 12:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: RE: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
|
AndrewOnDev Wrote: (09-30-2020, 01:44 PM)
--
atom Wrote: (09-30-2020, 12:16 PM)
--
AndrewOnDev Wrote: (09-29-2020, 08:14 PM)
--
If this is not a correct place to report some issues/make suggestions... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,762 |
09-30-2020, 02:35 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Brute Force Attack
Post: RE: New Brute Force Attack
| this is absolutly _not_ working like CPU hashcat :-)
check out: https://hashcat.net/wiki/mask_attack
there is no --increment, so the --bf-pw-min is always the same as the --bf-pw-max. i will add ... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
4 |
14,126 |
12-31-2011, 09:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Brute Force Attack
Post: RE: New Brute Force Attack
|
Hash-IT Wrote: (12-31-2011, 09:36 PM)
--
I got confused as I followed this (https://hashcat.net/wiki/brute_force_attack) link
Posted here (https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-761-post-3781.html#pid378... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
4 |
14,126 |
12-31-2011, 10:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New bug
Post: RE: New bug
| need a dictionary to reproduce. you are using -m 2 mode? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
15,365 |
07-02-2010, 07:34 AM |
