|
Search Results
|
| Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: New bug
Post: RE: New bug
| ok. i also tried it with some of my dictionaries but none of them found a password. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
15,365 |
07-02-2010, 08:33 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New bug
Post: RE: New bug
| root@sf:~/oclHashcat-0.22# echo aaa > word
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-0.22# cat word
aaa
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-0.22# echo -n aaaaaaaaa | md5sum
552e6a972... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
15,365 |
07-02-2010, 08:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New bug
Post: RE: New bug
| not sure. if it does not fit, use rapidshare or something similar |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
15,365 |
07-02-2010, 07:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New bug
Post: RE: New bug
| anyway, thanks for reporting! i will also keep an eye on it. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
15,365 |
07-03-2010, 06:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New card and dont work
Post: RE: New card and dont work
| I recommend to upgrade your Windows. AMD said they will drop Windows XP support with next SDK.
See here, Page 3: https://developer.amd.com/sdks/AMDAPPSDK/assets/AMD_APP_SDK_Release_Notes_Developer.pdf
|
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
6,719 |
03-07-2012, 11:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New card and dont work
Post: RE: New card and dont work
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
6,719 |
03-09-2012, 08:31 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New clause § 6 in EULA
Post: RE: New clause § 6 in EULA
| Sure, I am open to suggestions |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
2 |
12,201 |
07-01-2012, 11:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New feature sneakpeak: multirules
Post: RE: New feature sneakpeak: multirules
|
Quote:
--
... the possibility to include a directory instead of a file.
--
the idea of having presets is really nice. adding this feature is not a big problem. ACCEPTED.
Quote:
--
... now *-plu... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
16,801 |
12-02-2011, 01:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Hash Function
Post: RE: New Hash Function
| Not sure if this is the one you are talking about: https://github.com/b/ION/blob/master/ams/library/nullcrypt.c
Quote:
--
memcpy(cyphertext, plaintext, ptlen);
--
In that case I'd say it's s... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
3,331 |
08-05-2015, 02:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: new hashcat 3 does not work anymore on my nvidia
Post: RE: new hashcat 3 does not work anymore on my nvid...
| The 5xx series is too old and too slow. Best way to solve this is to upgrade to 1. new driver 2. new hardware with at least maxwell chipset |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
4,666 |
10-13-2016, 04:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hashcat crash in XP
Post: RE: New hashcat crash in XP
| Can't reproduce on Linux 64, can't reproduce on Win 32 :( |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
1 |
2,548 |
01-09-2013, 10:30 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New Hashing Algorithm Request
Post: RE: New Hashing Algorithm Request
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
7,169 |
10-01-2012, 10:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
|
martin.po21 Wrote: (02-06-2017, 11:39 PM)
--
However, I tested this on a capture file I already cracked and therefor I know capture is indeed valid (ATT?d?d?d network with default pass of 10 digits)-... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-07-2017, 11:28 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
|
rico Wrote: (02-07-2017, 01:01 AM)
--
Great stuff, handshake capturing always a tricky business. I just gave cap2hccapx a quick spin but didn't have much luck either I'm afraid. cap2hccapx seems to i... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-07-2017, 11:49 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| After some testing, that error:
Quote:
--
Invalid hccapx eapol size
--
and/or
Quote:
--
Invalid hccapx signature
--
is somehow related to windows beta binaries. We'll try to fix. |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-07-2017, 12:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| I've just upload hashcat beta 104. With it, you should be able to load the hccapx on windows, too. If it works I don't need the .cap. |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-07-2017, 12:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| Also note that this feature is kind of unique in the WPA/WPA2 cracking world. There's no other cracker (both commercial and non-commercial) that combines the packets in such a way that they produce at... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-08-2017, 09:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| Hehe, I guess in that case it will not take long to update it again, allowing it for combining of packets :) |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-09-2017, 10:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
|
abdou99 Wrote: (02-10-2017, 02:29 PM)
--
If you are saying that both values: 0 and 1 are crackable
so what's the news?
value = 0 ==> 50% Crackable
value = 1 ==> 100% Crackable
is that what are ... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-10-2017, 03:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| You can use the 3rd (optional) parameter of cap2hccapx to select a specific ESSID only. |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-15-2017, 09:01 PM |
