|
Search Results
|
| Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: New rule
Post: RE: New rule
| Yeah I thinks that it. Any idea how to skip the duplicates? Hashcat can not do it - not enough memory |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
5 |
10,962 |
05-09-2012, 08:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New rule function "backtrack" & reflect #
Post: RE: New rule function "backtrack" & reflect #
| If this is about keyboard-walks, why dont you just use a keyboard walk generator and pipe it to stdin? |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
8 |
21,142 |
09-29-2012, 03:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New rule function "backtrack" & reflect #
Post: RE: New rule function "backtrack" & reflect #
| JtR has an keyboard walk generator (not sure how good it is compared to deadones) plus you can use --stdout.
About your new function I am thinking of a different way to let you achieve what you are t... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
8 |
21,142 |
09-30-2012, 08:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New rule function "backtrack" & reflect #
Post: RE: New rule function "backtrack" & reflect #
| Lets say you have "m1" for memorize, "m2" for append buffer and "m3" for prepend buffer.
The rule: m1 r [ m3
Should do the same as "b".
m1 remembers the original buffer "p@ssW0rd".
r reverses it... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
8 |
21,142 |
10-01-2012, 10:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New SHA2 meet-in-the-middle optimization
Post: RE: New SHA2 meet-in-the-middle optimization
|
Quote:
--
FWIW we've had this optimization is JtR for a year or so, albeit only in our CPU code yet (not sure why). It was brought up back then by Aleksey Cherepanov in https://www.openwall.com/list... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
9,537 |
08-21-2016, 08:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New SHA2 meet-in-the-middle optimization
Post: RE: New SHA2 meet-in-the-middle optimization
| I don't see any relation between this optimization and cracking a length 62 password. Is this thread stealing attempt? |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
9,537 |
07-22-2018, 11:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New to Program
Post: RE: New to Program
|
brazen bag boy Wrote: (11-17-2012, 03:31 AM)
--
So it isnt in the dictionary?
--
Yeah, exactly.
brazen bag boy Wrote: (11-17-2012, 03:31 AM)
--
and what does that "rejected" mean
--
In this c... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
11,643 |
11-17-2012, 10:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New Tool: kwprocessor
Post: RE: New Tool: kwprocessor
| I had the same thoughts initially, but after some time I came to the conclusion that there needs to be some limit. There needs to be a hard limit of what is a keyboard walk. The only thing that made s... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
13 |
19,601 |
08-17-2016, 05:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Tool: kwprocessor
Post: RE: New Tool: kwprocessor
| OK, I just pushed the discussed feature to the GitHub repo. The kwp now is able to "jump over" a key, for example to generate a password like "a13d". This means it's no longer bound to just adjacant ... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
13 |
19,601 |
08-21-2016, 08:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: new version of oclhashcat lite
Post: RE: new version of oclhashcat lite
| Thats right. Currently I have no ideas how to improve SHA1 speed even more. All my optimizations went into -lite v0.09. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
5 |
10,428 |
05-02-2012, 09:57 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New version?
Post: RE: New version?
| thanks :-) well, my plan is to release oclHashcat+ v0.01 first. oclHashcat+ is the new GPU based straight-dictionary cracker which focuses on cracking heavily iterated algorithms like md5crypt or phpa... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
12,434 |
09-29-2010, 10:39 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New version?
Post: RE: New version?
| no bugs known for hashcat |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
12,434 |
09-30-2010, 07:32 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New version?
Post: RE: New version?
| this is a hashcat-gui issue and it has nothing to do with the release of hashcat v0.35. hashcat can run without the GUI. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
12,434 |
10-01-2010, 09:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: newbie - how do I open/view the example hash .vc file?
Post: RE: newbie - how do I open/view the example hash ....
| You cannot, it's encrypted. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
3 |
2,710 |
02-16-2019, 04:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Newbie Build Question?
Post: RE: Newbie Build Question?
| I think this message is not from the NV installer but from the Intel one. If that's the case and you're on Ubuntu 16.04, ignore it, it will successfully install and work afterwards. |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
4 |
5,735 |
05-13-2017, 02:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Newbie Fury
Post: RE: Newbie Fury
| This is a good hint. Since CPU do not have a real shared memory anyway we should remove this error detection for them. I'll update the code. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
4 |
2,610 |
06-22-2019, 03:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Newbie Fury
Post: RE: Newbie Fury
| Done: https://github.com/hashcat/hashcat/commit/2cda236a183576fc2ebd7c3384f076fae28e7884
New beta is available, too: https://hashcat.net/beta/ |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
4 |
2,610 |
06-22-2019, 04:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: newbie of oclHashcat-plus 0.07 need brute-force help
Post: RE: newbie of oclHashcat-plus 0.07 need brute-forc...
| you are missing the mask itself. maybe read the article again. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
22,645 |
02-02-2012, 06:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: newbie of oclHashcat-plus 0.07 need brute-force help
Post: RE: newbie of oclHashcat-plus 0.07 need brute-forc...
| with oclHashcat-plus v0.07 there is no more need to use maskprocessor for brute-force. run it in -a 3 mode:
cudahashcat-plus32 -m 500 hash.txt -a 3 -1 ?l?u?d ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
22,645 |
02-06-2012, 06:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: newbie of oclHashcat-plus 0.07 need brute-force help
Post: RE: newbie of oclHashcat-plus 0.07 need brute-forc...
|
TAPE Wrote: (02-11-2012, 04:50 PM)
--
So what I am not clear on is the WIKI mention of using the --bf-pw-min & --bf-pw-max switches for
bruteforce attacks.
Could anyone be so kind as to give an o... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
22,645 |
02-11-2012, 06:31 PM |
