|
Search Results
|
| Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat --restore not work correct
Post: RE: oclhashcat --restore not work correct
| very strange. i tried but failed to reproduce this on linux. maybe this is an windows related problem. i will try it again in the next days when i hopefully get back access to my windows development m... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
12,715 |
07-29-2010, 09:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat --restore not work correct
Post: RE: oclhashcat --restore not work correct
| yes, that was a 64 bit issue. my cross compiler did something wrong. i workarounded the problem. please test in next release or come to IRC to get the beta. however, this was only a display error. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
12,715 |
09-20-2010, 01:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat 0.15 Segmentation fault
Post: RE: oclHashcat 0.15 Segmentation fault
| Always those The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali) errors. Have anyever ever got it to work? Maybe we need a how-to-run-oclHashcat-on-The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,740 |
10-07-2013, 09:59 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat 0.22 error
Post: RE: oclhashcat 0.22 error
| how did you manage to disabled crossfire? this is the well known and often discussed HD5970 (cypress) crossfirex ATI driver problem. i have exactly the same error on my card and there is currently no ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
15,144 |
07-16-2010, 01:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat 0.22 error
Post: RE: oclhashcat 0.22 error
| you need to have crossfirex disabled. oh and there is another thing. on ATI, you need to have the cards connected to monitor. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
15,144 |
07-19-2010, 09:44 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat 1.00 - R9 290
Post: RE: oclHashcat 1.00 - R9 290
| You're missing a space after -m 2500 |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
20,659 |
12-12-2013, 04:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat 1.00 - R9 290
Post: RE: oclHashcat 1.00 - R9 290
| Please close the thread if the problem is solved. |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
20,659 |
12-12-2013, 04:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat 1.00 - R9 290
Post: RE: oclHashcat 1.00 - R9 290
| Do not use AMD APP SDK if you want to run oclHashcat. Make sure it's not installed. It's the primary source for strange errors on linux. |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
20,659 |
12-13-2013, 06:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat 1.20 - Reload previously-cracked hashes from potfile
Post: RE: oclHashcat 1.20 - Reload previously-cracked ha...
| you might want to use --show instead |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
5,152 |
05-05-2014, 03:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat 1.30 vs. Catalyst 14.10 on Linux
Post: RE: oclHashcat 1.30 vs. Catalyst 14.10 on Linux
| at least it's known the 7990 works with v1.30 and 14.6b |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
11 |
23,610 |
09-22-2014, 11:47 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat 21 speed reduction
Post: RE: oclhashcat 21 speed reduction
| please paste speed of v0.18 with this command:
oclHashcat.exe example.hash -1 ?l?d ?1?1?1?1 ?1?1?1?1 -n 8
and of v0.21 with this command:
oclHashcat.exe example.hash -1 ?l?d ?1?1?1?1 ?1?1?1?1 -n 8 ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
14,019 |
06-24-2010, 04:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat 21 speed reduction
Post: RE: oclhashcat 21 speed reduction
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
14,019 |
08-20-2010, 03:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat : potfile
Post: RE: oclhashcat : potfile
| No, i will not continue developing regular oclHashcat since its features will get merged into oclHashcat-plus in a later version. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
6 |
13,461 |
10-05-2011, 09:43 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat : potfile
Post: RE: oclhashcat : potfile
| wow!! thats what i call outrageous. user has been banned for forum rule violation (thread stealing). |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
6 |
13,461 |
10-10-2011, 02:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat : potfile
Post: RE: oclhashcat : potfile
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
6 |
13,461 |
10-12-2011, 04:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat and "--outfile-format=NUM"
Post: RE: oclHashcat and "--outfile-format=NUM"
|
atom |
General Talk
|
2 |
5,131 |
02-05-2016, 09:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat and juniper md5ns
Post: RE: oclhashcat and juniper md5ns
| if you use the -m 22 mode you dont need to append the :Administration Tools: static portion as oclhashcat does that for your. so you would just use the hash:
nKVUM2rwMUzPcrkG5sWIHdCtqkAibn:netscree... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
10,556 |
06-13-2014, 12:12 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclhashcat and linux
Post: RE: oclhashcat and linux
| yes and the user requires a valid xsessions. so the user that you use for login to ssh must be logged in via gdm. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
9,922 |
01-30-2012, 05:23 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat and memory
Post: RE: oclHashcat and memory
|
vector Wrote: (05-14-2010, 09:53 AM)
--
Thanks to the author for the nice tool !
I have a question: What is the maximum supported dictionary size on VGA with 512MB RAM ?
--
the size depends on the... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
7 |
22,896 |
05-16-2010, 11:53 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat and memory
Post: RE: oclHashcat and memory
| next version v0.20 will have wordlist segmentation. this allows wordlists to be of arbitrary size. limited memory will no longer be an issue. |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
7 |
22,896 |
06-01-2010, 11:59 AM |
