|
Search Results
|
| Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.18 HD5970 not work
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.18 HD5970 not work
| please try it exactly this way:
oclHashcat.exe example.hash -n 80 --gpu-loops 1024 -m 0 -1 ?l?d ?1?1?1?1 ?1?1?1?1
if this does not work, same problem was reported and solved here: https://hashcat.ne... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
16,802 |
05-25-2010, 02:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.18 HD5970 not work
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.18 HD5970 not work
| update: hd5970 (also multiple hd5970) work now on linux, but not on windows. we still have to wait for newer SDK. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
16,802 |
01-31-2011, 06:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
| it is still on position 0/98948190, wait until it increases. then it should show a value. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
24,290 |
06-18-2010, 01:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
| made speed display more user-friendly with dynamic suffixes means M/s, k/s or just /s depending on the speed value. old version shows M/s only which means on very low speed it would show 0M/s even it ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
24,290 |
06-18-2010, 02:44 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
|
Quote:
--
This can`t be true !
--
uhm, moment! you changed the attack. initial post showed:
Progress..: 0/98948190 (0.00%)
now its is:
Progress..: 131072/344011 (38.10%)
Quote:
--
... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
24,290 |
06-18-2010, 04:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
|
Quote:
--
If you think that this is normal - OK, you know better, I just want to help ...
--
yes, please continue doing that! critic is very welcome here. just in case you understood me wrong.
... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
24,290 |
06-18-2010, 06:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.20 vBulletin multihash mode
| fixed with oclHashcat v0.25 :-) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
24,290 |
01-31-2011, 06:53 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.23
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.23
| it possible to add it to oclHashcat. but not in the near future since there are other tasks that have higher priority such as adding md5crypt or phpass. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Announcements
|
1 |
11,314 |
08-26-2010, 11:55 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.23 --ERROR
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.23 --ERROR
| this is a known issue. usage of the 2nd unsupported gpu on hd5970 results in unexpected results. do not use it, see https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-73.html how to avoid it. btw cat v10.8 is already ou... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
5,491 |
08-28-2010, 09:41 AM |
| |
|
Thread: [split] cuLaunchGridAsync() 701
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.24
| can you try with latest driver pls? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
22,596 |
01-25-2011, 10:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.24
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.24
| because of the core refactorization. it comes back in a later version. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Announcements
|
2 |
16,105 |
02-08-2011, 10:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.25
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.25
| you still need 0.23 for joomla |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Announcements
|
2 |
12,607 |
03-10-2011, 11:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.25
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.25
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Announcements
|
2 |
12,607 |
03-16-2011, 10:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.26 + 4 x hd5970
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.26 + 4 x hd5970
| yeah, i guess it will not take long till ivan updates his sha1 kernel :) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
9 |
21,831 |
02-10-2011, 07:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.26 + 4 x hd5970
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.26 + 4 x hd5970
| i was just able to optimize the MD4 based kernels again.
NTLM: 35.5B/s |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
9 |
21,831 |
02-12-2011, 10:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.26 + 4 x hd5970
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.26 + 4 x hd5970
| i am in an very experimental phase, here are some (theoretical) updates of the new warp-mode kernels:
mysql: 145 B/s -> 1x = 36.4 B/s
md5: 25 B/s -> 1x = 6.2 B/s
sha1: 11.3 B/s -> 1x = 2825 M/s
this... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
9 |
21,831 |
02-16-2011, 07:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.26 + 4 x hd5970
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.26 + 4 x hd5970
| new version will rock massive in single hash cracking :) check out the forum often, i will release a public beta soon. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
9 |
21,831 |
02-18-2011, 06:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.26 + 4 x hd5970
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.26 + 4 x hd5970
| there is no such 12 character limit. you can already use a 8 + 4 mask (8 on the left, 4 on the right). 0.26 will include BFI_INT, otherwise these numbers wouldnt be possible :) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
9 |
21,831 |
02-20-2011, 10:01 AM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.26b
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.26b
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
15 |
43,756 |
02-21-2011, 06:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: oclHashcat v0.26b
Post: RE: oclHashcat v0.26b
| Thanks! Final version will be called oclHashcat-lite and will be released soon after SDK v2.4 is released. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
15 |
43,756 |
03-22-2011, 03:16 PM |
