Search Results
|
Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
Post: RE: oclHashcat v2.10 performance questions?
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
12,902 |
04-29-2016, 09:13 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat version 2.10, FPGA support?
Post: RE: oclHashcat version 2.10, FPGA support?
Latest oclHashcat beta (on github) supports all OpenCL platforms and all OpenCL device types. If the vendor of that FPGA provides such a OpenCL runtime, it should work. If it does, tell me :) |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
3 |
5,632 |
03-16-2016, 09:28 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Post: RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Did you make sure to have no words >= length 32 inside your dictionaries? That's the difference between both programs.
There's also a huge difference between b53 and b57, please try again with b57.... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
13 |
18,414 |
11-26-2013, 11:48 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Post: RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Yeah please post commandline. As mastercracker correctly said, it's a new check. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
13 |
18,414 |
11-26-2013, 10:03 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Post: RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat
getops allows the usage of -o between two arguments, but the function that tries to find out if the input hashfile and the outfile is the same seems not to work on windows. please wait for a fix |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
13 |
18,414 |
11-26-2013, 10:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat vs hashcat
Post: RE: oclhashcat vs hashcat
There's a new .exe at https://hashcat.net/beta
Please replace with the existing one and try again.
I can't test since I do not have access to windows system right now.
It's possible that it w... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
13 |
18,414 |
11-26-2013, 10:32 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat without window manager
Post: RE: oclHashcat without window manager
The main problem is that all drivers > catalyst 12.8 are very unstable (and slow). So you should stick to catalyst 12.8. Btw, X11 is not decreasing your cracking rates. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
7 |
12,783 |
12-30-2012, 11:39 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat without window manager
Post: RE: oclHashcat without window manager
The speed loss is mainly on SHA1 based algorithms, not MD4. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
7 |
12,783 |
01-02-2013, 12:27 PM |
|
|
Thread: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght exception error
Post: RE: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght ex...
what the problem using hashcat to do the --remove work? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
27,546 |
02-04-2011, 10:57 AM |
|
|
Thread: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght exception error
Post: RE: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght ex...
you may need to cut away the hashes. use cut (port also exists for windows) from unix utils package.
cut -b34- < foundpasswords.txt > foundpasswords.txt.cut
|
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
27,546 |
02-05-2011, 10:48 PM |
|
|
Thread: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght exception error
Post: RE: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght ex...
true. i will add it to oclhashcat+ in a later version. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
27,546 |
02-09-2011, 10:39 AM |
|
|
Thread: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght exception error
Post: RE: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght ex...
thats something it will do if it has --remove switch. till then, use hashcat cpu version to do it / see how it behaves |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
27,546 |
02-13-2011, 08:37 AM |
|
|
Thread: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght exception error
Post: RE: OclHashcat+ --remove option / line lenght ex...
has been added in the meanwhile. thread closed. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
15 |
27,546 |
10-24-2011, 12:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat+ help
Post: RE: oclhashcat+ help
please give more detailed informations so that we can reproduce the problem. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
9,862 |
03-10-2011, 06:50 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat+ help
Post: RE: oclhashcat+ help
can you please try again after removing the crossfire hardware bridge? i have been told it creates a lot of problems in gpgpu. oclHashcat handles each device seperatly with its own scheduler. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
9,862 |
03-11-2011, 11:31 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat+ seems not working, please help
Post: RE: oclHashcat+ seems not working, please help
its good an experienced user could not reproduce it since i do not have such a card to try it myself |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
10,988 |
04-26-2012, 10:23 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat+ seems not working, please help
Post: RE: oclHashcat+ seems not working, please help
the sdk must be uninstalled otherwise it wont work. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
10,988 |
04-26-2012, 02:59 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat+ v0.12 does not see the second card
Post: RE: oclhashcat+ v0.12 does not see the second card
clinfo doesnt see it, too. only 1 gpu and 1 cpu. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
6,895 |
04-23-2013, 04:33 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashCat, AMD R9 290x, Windows - works, but reboots at random.
Post: RE: oclHashCat, AMD R9 290x, Windows - works, but ...
It's a general AMD OpenCL runtime limitation |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
16,512 |
09-13-2014, 08:52 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-0.24 performance issue
Post: RE: oclHashcat-0.24 performance issue
The 2nd core of the hd5970 is only supported on linux (by using a undocumented variable). Officially the 2nd core of the hd5970 is not supported by OpenCL :-( As a workaround you can use the -d 1 swit... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
8,327 |
01-23-2011, 06:12 PM |