Search Results
|
Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.071 crashes when using brute-force option
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus 0.071 crashes when using brute...
LarryX Wrote: (04-27-2012, 12:32 PM)
--
. While testing I noticed that the "Password lengths range: 1 - 15" only seems to be a cosmetic bug, assuming it should reflect the amount of characters in the... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
12,932 |
04-27-2012, 12:58 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.071 crashes when using brute-force option
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus 0.071 crashes when using brute...
You are absolutly right. I have already fixed it:
Quote:
--
root@ht:~/oclHashcat-plus-0.08# ./cudaHashcat-plus64.bin -m 500 example500.hash -a 3 -1 ?l?u?d?s?F ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 --quiet
ERROR: ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
12,932 |
04-27-2012, 03:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.12 interface freeze issue...
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus 0.12 interface freeze issue...
blandyuk Wrote: (01-02-2013, 06:17 PM)
--
I've also had this issues when trying to crack WPA -m 2500, screen goes blank and no response, have to power-cycle. Noticed the WPA speeds are slower with v0... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
18,176 |
01-03-2013, 10:43 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.12 interface freeze issue...
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus 0.12 interface freeze issue...
I guess this is somethign that is happening when its comes to the last block of the calculation. Depending on -n size, the first block can be the last block so it just looks like its something differe... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
18,176 |
01-04-2013, 11:31 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
yes, truecrypt is next target |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,344 |
04-02-2013, 07:52 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
good input.
the first one might be a bug, but i can not reproduce it. can you give me some commandline examples please?
2nd one might be because oclhashcat works a lot different internal with its m... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,344 |
03-31-2013, 12:34 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus 0.15b3 vs hashcat 0.45b1
Yeah you are right. Next version will have it fixed :) |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
7 |
7,344 |
04-04-2013, 02:31 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus Benchmark Script
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus Benchmark Script
oclHashcat v1.00 will have a built-in benchmark system |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
23,657 |
11-19-2013, 10:15 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Thanks guys. I'm not sure if it's taped, question for epixoip :) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,767 |
05-17-2013, 03:48 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
The speeds on RipeMD160 will improve again once AMD fixes this confirmed bug:
https://devgurus.amd.com/thread/166396
Currently I have to workaround this which makes the code a little bit slower. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,767 |
05-17-2013, 04:01 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
No, I'm working on > length 15 support. If I'm done with that, I will release. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,767 |
05-17-2013, 05:56 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Thanks for the benchmarks!
As I said, there was potential to improve the Whirlpool hash. I've just finished implementing it.
On my 2x hd6990 speed increased from 31 kHash/s to 49 kHash/s.
--
... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,767 |
05-18-2013, 03:50 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
well, in theory - yes. in practice - no :) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,767 |
06-11-2013, 05:37 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
The relase date is not yet known. But shouldn't be to far. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,767 |
08-06-2013, 01:04 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus cracks TrueCrypt
Yes, you just need to copy the first 512 byte. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
32 |
157,767 |
08-29-2013, 09:29 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashCat-plus crashes on 7970 (Linux & Windows)
Post: RE: oclHashCat-plus crashes on 7970 (Linux & Windo...
Yes. oclHashcat-plus v0.07 does not support hd7970. oclHashcat-plus v0.08 beta does, but is not public accessible. You have to be patient. In the meanwhile you can use oclHashcat-lite for tests with t... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
1 |
5,695 |
03-29-2012, 10:01 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus is outdated now that it's 2013 :P?
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus is outdated now that it's 2013...
I do have a v0.10 beta ready for release. The problem why I dont do is more because of the catalyst driver. If I do a release, it will be for catalyst 12.8 which is very old now. But all the later one... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,921 |
12-31-2012, 04:13 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus is outdated now that it's 2013 :P?
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus is outdated now that it's 2013...
I am preparing for release, give me a few hours |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,921 |
12-31-2012, 04:33 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus isn't cracking my NTLM hash
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus isn't cracking my NTLM hash
Exactly, but, empty string checks will be added in a later version. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
6,496 |
05-21-2012, 06:26 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus mask batchscript
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus mask batchscript
Updated the section on wiki |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
5,925 |
11-05-2012, 11:38 AM |