Search Results
|
Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.10b35 issue
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus-0.10b35 issue
Can't reproduce (tested with hd5770 + hd7970):
oclHashcat-plus:
Recovered....: 70/338 Digests, 22/184 Salts (1st run)
Recovered....: 70/338 Digests, 22/184 Salts (2nd run)
Recovered....: 70/338 Dig... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,334 |
10-30-2012, 10:38 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.10b35 issue
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus-0.10b35 issue
I was able to reproduce the bug after talking to blandy on IRC. b36 is up and should fix it. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,334 |
10-30-2012, 03:47 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.10b35 issue
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus-0.10b35 issue
OK, thanks for reporting again! Both issues should be fixed with b38 |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
6 |
6,334 |
10-31-2012, 12:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: OclHashcat-plus-0.12 - 0.14 running ALOT slower than version 0.08
Post: RE: OclHashcat-plus-0.12 - 0.14 running ALOT slow...
For WPA, especially use -u 4096 - should be faster than 0.08 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
10,046 |
08-18-2013, 12:16 AM |
|
|
Thread: OclHashcat-plus-0.12 - 0.14 running ALOT slower than version 0.08
Post: RE: OclHashcat-plus-0.12 - 0.14 running ALOT slow...
Yes, if you change performance settings you have to redo all work. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
10,046 |
08-24-2013, 09:28 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.13b2
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus-0.13b2
Great find, thanks! It was in oclHashcat-lite and hashcat as wellmake r. Fixed and new betas are up. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
1 |
2,583 |
01-08-2013, 12:01 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.13b3
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus-0.13b3
export DISPLAY=:0
That should solve it |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
1 |
2,742 |
01-15-2013, 12:56 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus-0.14b6
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus-0.14b6
Yeah, thats fine. Its converted from a string to a number. Anyway thanks for reporting |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
1 |
2,769 |
03-21-2013, 02:19 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus32 backtrack clGetDeviceIDs() -1
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus32 backtrack clGetDeviceIDs() -...
As you can see yourself it is not finding your GPU, only the CPU. Maybe you are not executing it inside an x11 window? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
7,350 |
01-25-2012, 12:03 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus64 not valid win32 app ?
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus64 not valid win32 app ?
Default -n and --gpu-loops were changed a bit. You may need to adjust them. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
6,410 |
09-28-2012, 11:05 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat-plus64 WPA brute-forcing
Post: RE: oclhashcat-plus64 WPA brute-forcing
There is no ATI Radeon HD 5800 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
8,942 |
02-21-2012, 02:30 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat-plus64 WPA brute-forcing
Post: RE: oclhashcat-plus64 WPA brute-forcing
Whatever this card is, for a mobility version getting 28 khash/s is pretty good. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
8,942 |
02-21-2012, 02:37 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 bizzare output sections
Post: RE: oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 bizzare output sect...
If you do not use --outfile-format, does it still produce strange outputs? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
16,181 |
03-30-2013, 10:03 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 bizzare output sections
Post: RE: oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 bizzare output sect...
hmm ok, have to dig deeper into it. please post the stuff again as a trac ticket |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
9 |
16,181 |
03-31-2013, 12:38 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 permission denied, "stopped working"
Post: RE: oclhashcat-Plus64.exe 0.14 permission denied, ...
possible, yeah. i also need input hash and input dictionary. please post it somewhere seperatly. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
10,856 |
03-31-2013, 12:39 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus: resume after shutdown
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus: resume after shutdown
i know its an important feature but because of some of oclHashcat-plus optimizations that is not so easy to implement. currently i have no idea how but maybe in some time.... till that you have to do ... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
24,185 |
10-17-2011, 10:56 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus: resume after shutdown
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus: resume after shutdown
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
24,185 |
11-01-2011, 06:39 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat-plus: resume after shutdown
Post: RE: oclHashcat-plus: resume after shutdown
Resume / Restore support added to latest oclHashcat-plus version. Thread closed. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
24,185 |
01-02-2013, 12:35 PM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat64 stuck on "Generating bitmap tables..."
Post: RE: oclHashcat64 stuck on "Generating bitmap table...
guess the budget gpus don't like some of the algorithms, try easy ones like md5. or maybe the number of hashes, try with a single hash |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
22,535 |
05-08-2014, 11:17 AM |
|
|
Thread: oclHashcat64 stuck on "Generating bitmap tables..."
Post: RE: oclHashcat64 stuck on "Generating bitmap table...
maybe opencl.dll issue. remove catalyst, then manually delete opencl.dll in windows folder (because driver does not remove it), then reinstall driver |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
22,535 |
05-09-2014, 05:31 PM |