hashcat advanced password recovery

Old oclHashcat Support

10,991

01-13-2014, 12:07 AM

Thread: oclhashcat: recommended amount of RAM
Post: RE: oclhashcat: recommended amount of RAM

As RAM isn't that expensive anymore, I recommend 16gb of RAM. It's not really required but if you do a lot of cracking job it helps to have the dictionaries cached in RAM (automatically done by the OS...

Hardware

9,036

11-11-2013, 04:41 PM

Thread: OCLHashCatPlus/Lite crashes on long mask
Post: RE: OCLHashCatPlus/Lite crashes on long mask

such long masks are not supported (and will not in future). however it should not crash and give an error message instead. i tried, but i can not reproduce it locally. please give me an command so tha...

5,246

01-03-2012, 11:01 AM

Thread: OclHashtcat-lite exit codes
Post: RE: OclHashtcat-lite exit codes

you should try docs/status_codes.txt

Very old oclHashcat-lite Support

8,805

01-30-2012, 05:20 PM

Thread: oclhc+ -m 1100 (dcc) salt length limitation
Post: RE: oclhc+ -m 1100 (dcc) salt length limitation

ok, i think i can get v0.26 to double the username size to 16 chars. that should be enough? however it will decrease performance a bit. but what do you mean with newline appended?

13,750

02-16-2011, 10:17 AM

Thread: oclhc+ -m 1100 (dcc) salt length limitation
Post: RE: oclhc+ -m 1100 (dcc) salt length limitation

i am not sure if i can make it for oclhc+. maybe in a later version.

13,750

02-16-2011, 05:20 PM

Thread: oclhc+ bug?
Post: RE: oclhc+ bug?

can you try with md5 instead of dcc? dcc had problems in oclhc, too

19,261

02-23-2011, 09:34 PM

Thread: oclhc+ bug?
Post: RE: oclhc+ bug?

everything is fine! not a bug. both oclhc and oclhc+ just can not crack hashes with plain of length >= 16

19,261

02-25-2011, 12:42 PM

Thread: oclhc-lite 0.10 missing kernel
Post: RE: oclhc-lite 0.10 missing kernel

Thanks, fixed.

Beta Tester

2,795

06-10-2012, 09:58 AM

Thread: oclhc-plus: Incremental-bruteforce in hybrid attack
Post: RE: oclhc-plus: Incremental-bruteforce in hybrid a...

This is very hard to implement. More demand?

Feature Requests

20,671

06-11-2012, 09:36 AM

Thread: Odd Bruteforce Issue
Post: RE: Odd Bruteforce Issue

hopefully soon :)

Old oclHashcat Support

11,501

04-24-2015, 01:30 AM

Thread: Odd bug with hashcat-0.39 and SHA-512(Unix) hashes
Post: RE: Odd bug with hashcat-0.39 and SHA-512(Unix) ha...

I can reproduce it. I am pretty busy with oclHashcat, it might take some time to fix it. Many thanks for report!

Old hashcat Support

7,030

06-08-2012, 10:34 AM

Thread: Odd Formatting Using Tables
Post: RE: Odd Formatting Using Tables

this is because of the SSE2 implementation. insert len.bin in between your pipe and build a chain.

8,824

11-22-2011, 05:42 AM

Thread: Odd Formatting Using Tables
Post: RE: Odd Formatting Using Tables

if you use hashcat and --stdout as wordlist generator in combination with oclHashcat-plus, then no, you did not. it skips empty lines :)

8,824

11-22-2011, 08:16 PM

Thread: Office 2016?
Post: RE: Office 2016?

Good question, are they different to Office 2013?

General Talk

4,299

07-05-2017, 06:16 AM

Thread: Office collision: 7 or more characters?
Post: RE: Office collision: 7 or more characters?

What's the problem here?

hashcat

4,027

12-26-2016, 11:08 PM

Thread: Office collision: 7 or more characters?
Post: RE: Office collision: 7 or more characters?

Well, MD5 is 128 bit while RC4 (in this case) is only 40 bit. The mode #2 is not made to find collisions, it's more to find the correct password used. Having the correct password gives you the chance ...

hashcat

4,027

12-29-2016, 11:09 AM

Thread: office excel 2010 hash
Post: RE: office excel 2010 hash

Do you know the password? Is it 8 lowercase letters? Also there's an error in your commandline: It says ?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?1 but maybe you want ?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l

12,523

04-15-2015, 12:06 PM

Thread: office excel 2010 hash
Post: RE: office excel 2010 hash

you can slightly increase the performance using -w 3