Search Results
|
Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
In fact, I would love to see it beaten. We will all benefit from it.
GOGOGOGO Guys!!
|
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,610 |
03-22-2012, 07:41 PM |
|
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
hashcat 0.39 released, now everybody can participate |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,610 |
03-23-2012, 11:01 AM |
|
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,610 |
03-25-2012, 01:33 PM |
|
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Should be back, it was just limited to the top 10 |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,610 |
03-27-2012, 03:14 PM |
|
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
This is the write-up how I rebuild the new best64.rule out of all the submissions but for real-life use.
This new best64.rule will go into all hashcat distributions.
I took arex best 80's results po... |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,610 |
03-30-2012, 02:27 PM |
|
|
Thread: Finding some weird features (rules)
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
there is something wrong with your test, because $1@1u should find it. you sure you tried it correct? here is my log on which you will see its found:
Quote:
--
root@sf:~/hashcat-0.40# cat > hash
1b... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
12 |
25,304 |
03-30-2012, 11:49 PM |
|
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
the post was not deleted, just splitted into a seperate thread, since this thread is about the challange, not about strange rule engine behaiviors. please read the https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1027... |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,610 |
03-31-2012, 12:13 AM |
|
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
frekvent Wrote: (03-31-2012, 12:10 AM)
--
It turns out that "}}D1{" can be simplified to a single "]".
--
This is cool. I will update the post and the best64.rule. Thanks! |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,610 |
03-31-2012, 12:14 AM |
|
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Thanks to dakykilla:
Quote:
--
o0to0b o0t o0b
--
can be written as just "o0b" :) |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,610 |
04-21-2012, 10:02 AM |
|
|
Thread: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Post: RE: Official Best64 Challenge Thread
Its all about the slow ones, like md5crypt, phpass, WPA/WPA2... |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
48 |
132,610 |
05-06-2012, 03:44 PM |
|
|
Thread: Official Hastopus?
Post: RE: Official Hastopus?
Hashtopus is ideal for daily use and its pretty optimized from technical view. Many of the features go back to my own experience with password cracking.
I agree the interface doesnt look nice but ... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
11,203 |
04-27-2015, 01:52 PM |
|
|
Thread: OHC+ v0.12 does not see second card
Post: RE: OHC+ v0.12 does not see second card
aaaaa1 Wrote: (10-07-2013, 10:21 AM)
--
After installing AMD Catalyst 12.8 did
Code:
--
sudo aticonfig --adapter=all --initial -f
--
--
Did you reboot afterwards? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
14,055 |
10-07-2013, 10:24 AM |
|
|
Thread: OHC+ v0.12 does not see second card
Post: RE: OHC+ v0.12 does not see second card
descrypt speed depends on catalyst version, not oclHashcat-plus version. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
14,055 |
10-07-2013, 12:00 PM |
|
|
Thread: Old format available?
Post: RE: Old format available?
There's no algorithm that you can use out of the box to do that. You need to patch a kernel. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
3,975 |
07-19-2016, 09:21 AM |
|
|
Thread: Old hardware: how to run outdated oclhashcat
Post: RE: Old hardware: how to run outdated oclhashcat
No, hashcat went OSS with v2.00. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
11,038 |
12-31-2016, 05:04 PM |
|
|
Thread: Old hardware: how to run outdated oclhashcat
Post: RE: Old hardware: how to run outdated oclhashcat
The ideal versions are usually in docs/readme.txt somewhere in the header |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
7 |
11,038 |
01-02-2017, 10:15 AM |
|
|
Thread: Old MySQL Hashes not supported in anything but Hashcat CPU?
Post: RE: Old MySQL Hashes not supported in anything but...
i dont understand the reason for supporting mysql323 on GPU. you can just collide these hashes and if really required to not collide them, you can still hashcat cpu. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
4 |
10,904 |
01-05-2012, 11:08 PM |
|
|
Thread: Old MySQL Hashes not supported in anything but Hashcat CPU?
Post: RE: Old MySQL Hashes not supported in anything but...
i doubt you can do it a few minutes with gpu since special techniques heavily depending on memory access. memory access on GPU = big slowdown. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
4 |
10,904 |
01-06-2012, 11:24 AM |
|
|
Thread: Old Office and KDF
Post: RE: Old Office and KDF
You need to use 9720 if you collided with 9710 to get the password. Or you just use 9700. Using collider makes sense only if you want to find as many collisions as possible. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
13 |
10,132 |
01-23-2018, 11:34 AM |
|
|
Thread: Old Office and KDF
Post: RE: Old Office and KDF
Just use -m 9700 then and crack as normal |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
13 |
10,132 |
01-24-2018, 11:02 AM |