|
Search Results
|
| Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: performance diffrence PCIe
Post: RE: performance diffrence PCIe
| AFAIK there have never been made any benchmarks, or published. People say it does not make any difference. |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
3 |
6,438 |
01-09-2015, 04:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Performance drop with partially known long plain NTLM
Post: RE: Performance drop with partially known long pla...
| If you partially know the left part of the password you better not use oclHashcat-lite. Its built for maximum performance, so its working with so called reversal techniques. These techniques base on h... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
7 |
12,891 |
11-07-2012, 11:26 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Performance drop with partially known long plain NTLM
Post: RE: Performance drop with partially known long pla...
| rules work only with -a 0 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
7 |
12,891 |
11-08-2012, 10:24 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Performance related to password length
Post: RE: Performance related to password length
| Hard to estimate. Best way to find out is to modify the kernels directly. But gutfeeling tells me it's not much because of some other optimizations that went into the code since then. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,719 |
12-22-2016, 03:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: permission denied in hybrid mode
Post: RE: permission denied in hybrid mode
| Hybrid mode does not support folders |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
11,335 |
10-05-2012, 11:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Permutation
Post: RE: Permutation
| The toggle attack has been replaced by the more efficient toggle*.rule rules.
the permutation attack has been dropped because it isnt that efficient and its still in hashcat CPU or as standalone gene... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
1 |
6,069 |
01-09-2013, 09:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: permutation patterns
Post: RE: permutation patterns
| Btw, if this is about WPA, I remember one vendor from UK using such an algorithm. There's a wordlist for that case which is much lower than 1000 words. We successfully cracked them, see Blandys hashki... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
5 |
12,660 |
01-23-2015, 12:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: PHD hashrunner 2013
Post: RE: PHD hashrunner 2013
| I'm going to quote some of the comments
@thorsheim
Quote:
--
"Since there are no such hints in the reality."
I agree with what you wrote, except that part Atom. In real life there is a *to... |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
16 |
39,392 |
05-28-2013, 08:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: PHDAYS 2014 Hashrunner writeup Team Hashcat
Post: RE: PHDAYS 2014 Hashrunner writeup Team Hashcat
| Thanks! :) Fixed some typos. |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
6 |
35,988 |
05-19-2014, 11:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: PHDays Hash Runner challenge
Post: RE: PHDays Hash Runner challenge
| We just got our certificate! :)
https://hashcat.net/s/a/diploma_phd_team_hashcat.jpg |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
10 |
23,598 |
06-29-2012, 07:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: PHDays Hashrunner challenge 2015
Post: RE: PHDays Hashrunner challenge 2015
| Please update your post once the registration page is available. Team Hashcat will participate |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
11 |
23,252 |
05-09-2015, 12:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: PHDays Hashrunner challenge 2015
Post: RE: PHDays Hashrunner challenge 2015
|
forumhero Wrote: (05-18-2015, 07:39 PM)
--
Congrats to Hashcat team!
I'm happy I wasn't in last place :)
--
I saw that :) Good work! |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
11 |
23,252 |
05-19-2015, 10:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: PHDays Hashrunner challenge 2015 - Writeup
Post: RE: PHDays Hashrunner challenge 2015 - Writeup
| If you want to crack SCRYPT with hashcat just check out the latest beta version. |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
14 |
39,743 |
05-24-2015, 04:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: phpBB uses bcrypt
Post: RE: phpBB uses bcrypt
| You can use -m 3200 to crack $2y$10$ hashes. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
1,975 |
08-14-2019, 11:12 AM |
| |
|
Thread: phpBB uses bcrypt
Post: RE: phpBB uses bcrypt
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
1,975 |
08-22-2019, 11:21 AM |
| |
|
Thread: pipe hashes through stdout?
Post: RE: pipe hashes through stdout?
| You can use tools/test.pl in passthrough mode to generate hashes. However the tool is designed for unit-tests, not to run fast.
If you want to print out hashes calculated that makes sense only for ... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,620 |
09-05-2016, 09:40 AM |
| |
|
Thread: pipe hashes through stdout?
Post: RE: pipe hashes through stdout?
| Yes, that will not give you nearly the performance you can get out of hashcat. Read this: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#does_the_pci-express_speed_have_any_influence_... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,620 |
09-08-2016, 08:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Pipe is slow
Post: RE: Pipe is slow
| Sometimes, with a lot of GPU power, it takes a bit of manual support. Please optimize your attack. Here's an example:
Quote:
--
root@et:~/hashcat-0.50# head -10000 /root/dict/untouched/rockyou.t... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
14 |
21,246 |
03-15-2015, 11:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: piping hashcat into pyrit
Post: RE: piping hashcat into pyrit
| Its still questionable why you use pyrit at all. Its old, not maintained and slower than oclHashcat-plus. Its even slower when running with GPU + CPU at once while oclHashcat-plus only uses GPU. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
13,264 |
08-31-2012, 10:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Piping Hashcat to Crunch?
Post: RE: Piping Hashcat to Crunch?
| yes you can, but you should consider using maskprocessor, its like 8 times faster than crunch and more flexible.
https://hashcat.net/files/maskprocessor-0.65.7z
Code:
--
$ ./mp64.bin ?d?d?d?d?d?d?d... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
12,198 |
09-29-2011, 02:23 PM |
