Search Results
|
Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: piping incremental JtR into hashcat to crack WPA2
Post: RE: piping incremental JtR into hashcat to crack W...
It should, yeah. I dont know the command for jtr incremental but this should inspire you:
./john --stdout | ./oclHashcat-plus -m 2500 ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
10,067 |
08-21-2012, 08:17 PM |
|
|
Thread: piping incremental JtR into hashcat to crack WPA2
Post: RE: piping incremental JtR into hashcat to crack W...
Or try this: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1291.html |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
10,067 |
08-22-2012, 09:53 AM |
|
|
Thread: Piping Masprocessor in oclHashcat
Post: RE: Piping Masprocessor in oclHashcat
looks good and make sure to have hash:salt in lower case |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
10,704 |
03-03-2015, 02:52 PM |
|
|
Thread: Piping Masprocessor in oclHashcat
Post: RE: Piping Masprocessor in oclHashcat
For more complex password policy like rules please use PACK |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
10,704 |
03-08-2015, 01:02 PM |
|
|
Thread: Piping speed
Post: RE: Piping speed
The piping is not the slow part, the absence of amplifier is. If you add rules for examples, it speed will increase again, but it will take more time. Doesn't really make sense if you use MP just to b... |
|
atom |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
8 |
8,131 |
07-28-2017, 01:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: Piping speed
Post: RE: Piping speed
Yes, if you want to get full speed. However, hashcat can not do -r as how MP is doing it.
Here's an article on amplifier: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#how_to_creat... |
|
atom |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
8 |
8,131 |
07-29-2017, 04:54 PM |
|
|
Thread: Piping speed from statsprocessor to oclhashcat
Post: RE: Piping speed from statsprocessor to oclhashcat
Depending on the algorithm you use, this speed sounds to low. For example if this is MD5, you should be in den 500M or more range. If thats so, you might have forgotten to add rules as a multiplier. T... |
|
atom |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
9 |
21,030 |
09-05-2013, 05:46 PM |
|
|
Thread: Piping speed from statsprocessor to oclhashcat
Post: RE: Piping speed from statsprocessor to oclhashcat
Try passwordspro.rule. It should be big enough. If you do not get more speed with it than with best64, then you're already running at maximum speed. Also note that rule-based attacks are slower than b... |
|
atom |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
9 |
21,030 |
09-06-2013, 10:01 AM |
|
|
Thread: Plaintext within DES ECB mode 14000
Post: RE: Plaintext within DES ECB mode 14000
This has nothing to do with hashcat. DES is a block cipher using a block size of 8 bytes. Therefore both the PT and the CT need to be exactly 8 bytes, too. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
3,390 |
12-01-2016, 07:23 PM |
|
|
Thread: Platform choice
Post: RE: Platform choice
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
1 |
5,916 |
07-12-2010, 01:46 PM |
|
|
Thread: Please add auto redirect forum to HTTPS
Post: RE: Please add auto redirect forum to HTTPS
The complex password is because of spam bots. Most of them have bad password generators. If you really want SSL all the time, why don't you install add SSL enforcer plugin (I use KB SSL Enforcer). Muc... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
11 |
18,535 |
06-30-2014, 01:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: please add PuTTY private key cracker ! thx
Post: RE: please add PuTTY private key cracker ! thx
Rewrite it to get rid of the includes and we will think about it. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
6,346 |
02-15-2017, 09:02 PM |
|
|
Thread: please help
Post: RE: please help
works fine for me:
Quote:
--
root@sf:~/xy/oclHashcat-lite-0.09# ./oclHashcat-lite64.bin ba7617f5a5841de469a3110754d3c5c6 --custom-charset1 ?l?u?d --pw-min 28 --pw-max 28 1896352_125477090_?1?1?1?1?... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
4 |
11,537 |
03-20-2012, 01:06 PM |
|
|
Thread: please help
Post: RE: please help
if you can, try on linux pls |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
4 |
11,537 |
03-22-2012, 07:30 PM |
|
|
Thread: Please help "no hashes found error"
Post: RE: Please help "no hashes found error"
The outfile should be exactly 392 byte |
|
atom |
General Help
|
3 |
6,771 |
11-11-2013, 04:32 PM |
|
|
Thread: please help! (with hash)
Post: RE: please help! (with hash)
Just use the first 512 byte (copy/create them into a file with a hex editor) and use -m 6221 |
|
atom |
General Help
|
1 |
3,971 |
07-29-2014, 08:43 PM |
|
|
Thread: Please help: 2 of the 4 290X are way too slow when performing dictionary attack
Post: RE: Please help: 2 of the 4 290X are way too slow ...
I remember some time ago there were "fake" 6970 cards. I don't mean the "unlocked" 6950. That was a 6850 or so with a faked bios so that it showed as a 6970 to the system. Don't know about the details |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
27 |
42,109 |
07-23-2014, 09:41 AM |
|
|
Thread: Please help: 2 of the 4 290X are way too slow when performing dictionary attack
Post: RE: Please help: 2 of the 4 290X are way too slow ...
Just a though, those 290x maybe are not 290x :) |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
27 |
42,109 |
07-23-2014, 09:45 AM |
|
|
Thread: Please help: 2 of the 4 290X are way too slow when performing dictionary attack
Post: RE: Please help: 2 of the 4 290X are way too slow ...
Right, I just had that idea when he said that he's using 2 different brands, 2 times ASUS and 2 times Sapphire so I thought maybe the Sapphire (or the ASUS) are fake ones.
I just had an idea. Why n... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
27 |
42,109 |
07-23-2014, 09:51 AM |
|
|
Thread: Please vote
Post: RE: Please vote
For those haven't seen it: There's a voting system on top of this thread |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
9 |
11,209 |
02-10-2017, 08:49 PM |