Search Results
|
Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Please vote
Post: RE: Please vote
OK, poll is closed now. Bad thing is that I've found in the meanwhile that the idea didn't work out, so everything will stay as-is :) |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
9 |
11,209 |
02-11-2017, 11:52 AM |
|
|
Thread: pls help me ,i'm can't run hashcat(have picture)
Post: RE: pls help me ,i'm can't run hashcat(have pictur...
no! first read it, then make sure you can agree to it. if not, see § 9 otherwise enter YES. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
3 |
9,349 |
10-06-2011, 10:12 AM |
|
|
Thread: plus b53 rule length limit ?
Post: RE: plus b53 rule length limit ?
Yeah the numbers of functions per rule have been increased to 15, but thats since long time already. I will fix wiki entry |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
4 |
4,432 |
07-22-2013, 10:45 AM |
|
|
Thread: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
Post: RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oc...
plus is much faster than old oclHashcat. otherwise i wouldnt have changed :) 700000000 hashes at once is such a huge amount of hashes that the results are unpredictable. maximum i tested was 24000000 ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
14 |
24,730 |
01-02-2012, 11:16 AM |
|
|
Thread: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
Post: RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oc...
as chort already said, increase the -n value:
oclHashcat-plus64.exe 1.txt -a 3 ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1 -1 ?l?d -o 1.out -n 80
|
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
14 |
24,730 |
01-02-2012, 03:53 PM |
|
|
Thread: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
Post: RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oc...
since brute-force has been ported from lite and not from regular oclHashcat, speeds depend a lot on the number of hashes.
for example, with 2 hashes:
plus 0.07: Speed........: 5013.7M c/s Real, 5... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
14 |
24,730 |
01-03-2012, 11:21 AM |
|
|
Thread: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
Post: RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oc...
ok i found out what is the real source of the problem. i really had a hard time to find the reason because both, oclHashcat-plus and oclHashcat, share the same multihash binary search routine.
after... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
14 |
24,730 |
01-04-2012, 06:30 PM |
|
|
Thread: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oclhashcat ?
Post: RE: Plus is too slow. How can I continue to use oc...
have it already fixed in v0.08 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
14 |
24,730 |
01-12-2012, 10:08 AM |
|
|
Thread: Poor performance Mac OS and ATI Radeon HD 5870
Post: RE: Poor performance Mac OS and ATI Radeon HD 5870
The GPU is ways too old, the drivers are outdated. I'm sure you had to use --force to get it working. There's a reason why we put that flag there. Solution: Trash the GPU, buy a new one. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
4,080 |
04-09-2017, 08:54 AM |
|
|
Thread: Portable Restore File
Post: RE: Portable Restore File
right, its not that easy so it wont happen |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
7,952 |
03-26-2013, 12:53 PM |
|
|
Thread: Positive Hack Days - Hash Runner (writeup)
Post: RE: Positive Hack Days - Hash Runner (writeup)
In theory yes. I am wondering why the PHDays organisators did not release them. Maybe there are some restrictions to be checked? |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
7 |
39,910 |
06-08-2012, 10:13 AM |
|
|
Thread: Positive Hack Days - Hash Runner (writeup)
Post: RE: Positive Hack Days - Hash Runner (writeup)
Finally, all the writeups, rules, stats and plaintexts were released:
https://phdays.com/program/contests/hashrunner/stat/ |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
7 |
39,910 |
06-18-2012, 05:25 PM |
|
|
Thread: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
Post: RE: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
i dont know if there are any technical reasons for not adding zip or aes to gpgpu based cracking. i never looked into them. hc and oclhc are made for competition and these competitions usually base on... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
27 |
130,517 |
10-26-2010, 09:48 AM |
|
|
Thread: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
Post: RE: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
27 |
130,517 |
11-15-2011, 03:34 PM |
|
|
Thread: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
Post: RE: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
Hash-IT Wrote: (02-08-2012, 01:12 AM)
--
I have added the request here (https://hashcat.net/wiki/feature_requests).
We'll just have to see if he accepts it. :)
--
thanks for the update, looks nice |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
27 |
130,517 |
02-08-2012, 11:11 AM |
|
|
Thread: Possible 16 digit combinations
Post: RE: Possible 16 digit combinations
It's a bad attack if you run a Fixed value in the beginning of the "Password". Use -m 20 instead, you will get a speedup of at least 100. |
|
atom |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
2 |
3,712 |
02-07-2018, 07:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: Possible bug
Post: RE: Possible bug
iirc, the character ^ is (was?) the escape character on windows shell. so it is possible to create problems. not really sure about.
at least on my win7 box it does not crash, it worked as expected. b... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
10,044 |
05-27-2010, 09:54 AM |
|
|
Thread: Possible bug
Post: RE: Possible bug
fixed with oclHashcat v0.25 :-) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
10,044 |
01-31-2011, 06:54 PM |
|
|
Thread: Possible bug
Post: RE: Possible bug
hey mastercracker, congrats for winning! and yes, phpass multihash issue will be fixed in 0.06 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
8,634 |
08-19-2011, 10:29 AM |
|
|
Thread: Possible bug
Post: RE: Possible bug
can you please be a bit more specific and create a seperate thread for this? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
8,634 |
08-19-2011, 07:16 PM |