|
Search Results
|
| Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with ATI 5970
Post: RE: Problem with ATI 5970
| this is a driver issue. on current catalyst v10.6 it affects both linux and windows and both cal and opencl. there are several reports on ati's developer forum. ATI knows about the driver problem and ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
10,857 |
06-30-2010, 09:32 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with comand line and -m mode!
Post: RE: Problem with comand line and -m mode!
| the 1st example did not work because you only used a single wordlist (as rolf said). you need at least two wordlists OR one wordlist and one mask OR two masks.
the 2nd example should work. the hash m... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
11,291 |
07-01-2010, 03:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with comand line and -m mode!
Post: RE: Problem with comand line and -m mode!
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
11,291 |
07-12-2010, 01:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with conversion from .cap to .hccap
Post: RE: Problem with conversion from .cap to .hccap
| BTW, I've added wpaclean to online converter |
|
atom |
General Help
|
5 |
17,692 |
04-11-2013, 07:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with DCC Hash
Post: RE: Problem with DCC Hash
| Usually DCC uses the username as salt. In that case, you'd write:
d2578hcf7990099a1e1c523041c6687e:jhon.may |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
9,203 |
03-03-2015, 03:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with DCC Hash
Post: RE: Problem with DCC Hash
| Then the hash export is propably wrong |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
9,203 |
03-03-2015, 04:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with DCC Hash
Post: RE: Problem with DCC Hash
| No sorry, I have no experience with that. Maybe someone elsE? |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
9,203 |
03-03-2015, 04:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with Hashcat and mscash2
Post: RE: Problem with Hashcat and mscash2
| Here's an example -m 2100 hash:
$DCC2$10240#tom#e4e938d12fe5974dc42a90120bd9c90f |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
8,806 |
09-27-2016, 02:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with Hashcat and mscash2
Post: RE: Problem with Hashcat and mscash2
| Why 10241? If you use 10241 it will not work. Both JtR and hashcat use the $DCC2$ format. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
8,806 |
09-28-2016, 02:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with HD7970 and PCI -Extenders
Post: RE: Problem with HD7970 and PCI -Extenders
| What is this jumpering about? |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
12 |
28,142 |
04-06-2012, 09:50 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with HD7970 and PCI -Extenders
Post: RE: Problem with HD7970 and PCI -Extenders
|
atom |
Hardware
|
12 |
28,142 |
04-06-2012, 01:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with library
Post: RE: Problem with library
| Your symlink seem to have worked otherwise you would get a different error message.
Which GPU is it? |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
6,787 |
03-26-2014, 07:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with LM aad3b435b51404ee
Post: RE: Problem with LM aad3b435b51404ee
| Clearly a bug. Please open a GitHub Isuee |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
5,169 |
07-12-2016, 09:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with nsldaps, SSHA-1(Base64), Netscape LDAP SSHA
Post: RE: Problem with nsldaps, SSHA-1(Base64), Netscape...
| Hashcat handles CRLF automatically, at least \r\n and \n, not \r |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
6,641 |
02-26-2015, 11:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA1
Post: RE: Problem with PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA1
| We changed the encoding for the salt in the PBKDF2-HMAC-* generic hashes from raw to base64 with latest oclHashcat v1.38 (which is not yet released). For details see https://hashcat.net/trac/ticket/66... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
9,603 |
10-08-2015, 10:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA1
Post: RE: Problem with PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA1
| Not just digits, it should work for all data as long as it does not include 0x00, \n or : |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
9,603 |
10-10-2015, 08:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA1
Post: RE: Problem with PBKDF2-HMAC-SHA1
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
9,603 |
10-14-2015, 09:25 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with performance
Post: RE: Problem with performance
| hashcat is not optimized for brute force, but oclHashcat-lite is. that is because even with 64 high speed cpus you can not beat home computer with single hd6990 gpu. |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
4 |
11,408 |
12-12-2011, 11:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with plus vs little
Post: RE: Problem with plus vs little
| Yes, its a bug, one that cant be resolved nor workarounded. Only AMD can fix it.
Its however not new. Please use the search function before posting.
Please continue discussion on the original thread... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
8,836 |
06-20-2012, 09:56 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Problem with rule based attacks
Post: RE: Problem with rule based attacks
| this is a known issue, see here: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-767.html
thanks for reporting. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
8,266 |
01-10-2012, 11:55 AM |
