Search Results
|
Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Recover passwords in output user:plain
Post: RE: Recover passwords in output user:plain
This "feature" should work even without having a GPU. Try it pls and report. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
9 |
32,233 |
03-18-2012, 07:25 PM |
|
|
Thread: Recover passwords in output user:plain
Post: RE: Recover passwords in output user:plain
see here: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-985-post-5037.html#pid5037 |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
9 |
32,233 |
03-19-2012, 11:17 AM |
|
|
Thread: recovering Sha1+salt password with oclHashCat
Post: RE: recovering Sha1+salt password with oclHashCat
awesome, thanks. thread closed. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
9,832 |
08-21-2011, 03:42 PM |
|
|
Thread: Recovery file for hashcat
Post: RE: Recovery file for hashcat
ok, recovery file maybe in the next version. the increment function just starts with the length defined in --bf-pw-min (default = 1) and ends when finished the length defined in --bf-pw-max (default =... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
11,033 |
01-11-2011, 10:13 AM |
|
|
Thread: Recovery file for hashcat
Post: RE: Recovery file for hashcat
Resume / Restore support added to latest oclHashcat-plus version. Thread closed. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
11,033 |
01-02-2013, 12:36 PM |
|
|
Thread: Reduce special charset
Post: RE: Reduce special charset
this was fixed in the meanwhile. to use ? you have to use ??. also you can use --hex-salt or --hex-charset if quoting fails. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
3 |
9,154 |
01-10-2012, 04:54 PM |
|
|
Thread: Reduced MD5
Post: RE: Reduced MD5
the compare code is in the kernel not in the oclhashcat binary. however this is a single-user request so it will have lower priority. if i have some spare time i will add it. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
19,171 |
09-20-2010, 09:31 AM |
|
|
Thread: Reduced MD5
Post: RE: Reduced MD5
I dont know of any. It would require a special new kernel to do it. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
19,171 |
09-13-2012, 10:27 AM |
|
|
Thread: Reduced performance
Post: RE: Reduced performance
Yes, this GPU has very bad performance when it comes to crypto |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
5,931 |
12-02-2016, 07:30 PM |
|
|
Thread: Reduced performance
Post: RE: Reduced performance
Nope, there's no good AWS GPU. AWS GPU's are good for floating point operations (flops), not raw integer power. In crypto, we need raw integer power. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
5,931 |
12-02-2016, 07:49 PM |
|
|
Thread: Regarding gpu-accel & gpu-loops
Post: RE: Regarding gpu-accel & gpu-loops
The direct use of -n and -u will no longer be supported with hashcat v3.00 which will automatically tune them for you. You will be able to select a configurationĀ based on the following profiles:
... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
7,409 |
06-29-2016, 12:02 PM |
|
|
Thread: Regarding gpu-accel & gpu-loops
Post: RE: Regarding gpu-accel & gpu-loops
unixm Wrote: (06-29-2016, 12:38 PM)
--
Is there a possibility that using values other than what's specified as recommended for WPA2 for example 16 /16 would cause it to skip the correct value or is i... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
7,409 |
06-29-2016, 03:22 PM |
|
|
Thread: Rejector modifier
Post: RE: Rejector modifier
That should be already possible with rules:
Quote:
--
N reject the word unless it is greater than N characters long
'N truncate the word at length N
--
|
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
8 |
16,648 |
11-20-2012, 04:14 PM |
|
|
Thread: Rejector modifier
Post: RE: Rejector modifier
Yeah right, its not in the docs. I just forgot to mention them. But they are inside since ever, since the first hashcat version. The following rules are supported:
#define RULE_OP_REJECT_LESS ... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
8 |
16,648 |
11-20-2012, 09:17 PM |
|
|
Thread: Rejector modifier
Post: RE: Rejector modifier
They are available for CPU based rules (makes no sense for fast GPU engine). That is
1. hashcat cpu
2. oclHashcat-plus by using -j and -k
3. oclHashcat-plus if the algorithm is a slow one. That is 4... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
8 |
16,648 |
11-21-2012, 11:05 AM |
|
|
Thread: release 0.15 froze
Post: RE: release 0.15 froze
there is beta2 up, try again please |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
14 |
14,534 |
08-28-2013, 12:09 PM |
|
|
Thread: release 0.15 froze
Post: RE: release 0.15 froze
those threading semaphores gave us some headaches. try new beta4 please |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
14 |
14,534 |
08-29-2013, 11:18 AM |
|
|
Thread: release 0.15 froze
Post: RE: release 0.15 froze
b5 is up as well, fixing the same issue for nvidia |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
14 |
14,534 |
08-29-2013, 04:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: Remote Desktop
Post: RE: Remote Desktop
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
9,277 |
10-01-2011, 08:10 PM |
|
|
Thread: remote desktop issues with gpuwatchdog
Post: RE: remote desktop issues with gpuwatchdog
there is no such known issue, might be related to RDP |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
4 |
10,734 |
02-28-2012, 11:40 AM |