Search Results
|
Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Reversing MSCHAPv2 to NTLM
Post: RE: Reversing MSCHAPv2 to NTLM
No, netntlmv2 is completely different and has a dedicated hash-mode in hashcat. |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
18 |
36,659 |
03-07-2017, 10:00 AM |
|
|
Thread: Review - AMD Radeon R9 290X
Post: RE: Review - AMD Radeon R9 290X
There is 13.12 stable now, you might want to try again with that one |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
75 |
216,074 |
12-21-2013, 04:57 PM |
|
|
Thread: Right salt usage
Post: RE: Right salt usage
you have latest oclHashcat-plus? brute force with -a 3 and read this: https://hashcat.net/wiki/mask_attack |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
8,010 |
02-27-2012, 08:53 PM |
|
|
Thread: RIPv2
Post: RE: RIPv2
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
9,442 |
10-15-2013, 05:05 PM |
|
|
Thread: RIPv2
Post: RE: RIPv2
Thanks magnum!
In this case you can -not- use use hashcat to crack RIPv2. But it's easy to add.
@digininja: can you provide example hash and plain in their "natural" form? That is extracted wit... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
4 |
9,442 |
10-22-2013, 09:48 AM |
|
|
Thread: Ruby Hashcat Wrapper
Post: RE: Ruby Hashcat Wrapper
Nice! Can you tell something about features etc? |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
5 |
11,670 |
06-30-2014, 01:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: Ruby Hashcat Wrapper
Post: RE: Ruby Hashcat Wrapper
cool, thanks! isn't metasploit using ruby? i think they added support for hashcat a while back, maybe than can make special use of it |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
5 |
11,670 |
09-22-2014, 11:51 AM |
|
|
Thread: rule bug in oclHashCat-plus?
Post: RE: rule bug in oclHashCat-plus?
You are absolutly right, but somebody already reported this on IRC, so i fixed it for the betas. In the next release it will be fixed. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
9,341 |
06-27-2012, 04:49 PM |
|
|
Thread: rule bug in oclHashCat-plus?
Post: RE: rule bug in oclHashCat-plus?
Easiest way to find out is to use hashcat in --stdout mode:
Quote:
--
root@sf:~/hashcat-0.40# cat dict
password
password1
password12
password123
password1234
root@sf:~/hashcat-0.40# cat rule
>A
roo... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
9,341 |
06-28-2012, 09:55 AM |
|
|
Thread: Rule collection.
Post: RE: Rule collection.
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
1 |
6,563 |
05-27-2014, 06:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: Rule file (very common 'complex' passwords)
Post: RE: Rule file (very common 'complex' passwords)
Hey, is it really 90% the ! character? Thanks for the rule! |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
6 |
14,856 |
01-29-2014, 10:57 AM |
|
|
Thread: Rule Functions With Control Characters?
Post: RE: Rule Functions With Control Characters?
it works for all chars 0x00 - 0xff except 0x00 and \n -- just post the character as it is like i4ö |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
3,980 |
06-13-2014, 12:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: Rule Generation - Large Prefix + Postfix
Post: RE: Rule Generation - Large Prefix + Postfix
The total numbers for supported plains in hashcat cpu is 55 (including the ones generated by rules). Also note, if you use ^, to write stuff backwards. Its a common error. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
1 |
8,766 |
07-22-2013, 10:50 AM |
|
|
Thread: Rule help
Post: RE: Rule help
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
4,934 |
05-17-2017, 12:10 PM |
|
|
Thread: Rule new
Post: RE: Rule new
There is rules that enable you to skip words from your wordlist based on certain criterias. See rejection section here: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=rule_based_attack
Note that for oclHashc... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
3 |
7,867 |
05-09-2015, 11:59 AM |
|
|
Thread: Rule or hybrid attack
Post: RE: Rule or hybrid attack
i'd suggest using maskprocessor to generate the rules, see https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=rules_with_maskprocessor |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
5,369 |
02-02-2014, 12:12 AM |
|
|
Thread: Rule Piping Request
Post: RE: Rule Piping Request
wait, we have a standalone solution for this: https://hashcat.net/wiki/rules_with_maskprocessor
|
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
20 |
45,531 |
11-18-2011, 10:25 AM |
|
|
Thread: Rule Piping Request
Post: RE: Rule Piping Request
yes there are limitations. in hashcat it tried to sort out dupliated rules and therefore has to manage an lookup-tree which requires memory. this means the more rules you add, the more startup-time is... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
20 |
45,531 |
11-19-2011, 11:03 AM |
|
|
Thread: Rule Piping Request
Post: RE: Rule Piping Request
rules for filtering non-printable ascii. this sounds somehow a bad idea. this have to be done with each execution of hashcat. if its that important, why not clean them in the source, in other words, i... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
20 |
45,531 |
11-22-2011, 05:18 AM |
|
|
Thread: Rule Piping Request
Post: RE: Rule Piping Request
here is a perl version. not the fastest, but had to write it quickly. maybe i add a filtering tool to hashcat-utils. till that, use this:
$ perl calc.pl < in.dict > out.dict
Code:
--
#!/usr/bin/en... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
20 |
45,531 |
11-22-2011, 08:13 PM |