|
Search Results
|
| Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Truecrypt / Veracrypt Container
Post: RE: Truecrypt / Veracrypt Container
| Vercrypt is like Truecrypt: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#how_do_i_extract_the_hashes_from_truecrypt_volumes |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
5,757 |
10-13-2016, 04:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Truecrypt Issues
Post: RE: Truecrypt Issues
| If this is not a boot device it makes not sense to attack it with 624x, so why should you. It will just increase the time. For the other three modes 6213, 6223 and 6233: Just run them in a sequence |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,793 |
02-13-2017, 11:36 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Truecrypt keyfile support ?
Post: RE: Truecrypt keyfile support ?
| There has not been a single request for this in years |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
11,810 |
04-19-2015, 02:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: TrueCrypt pass of lowercase letters and numbers
Post: RE: TrueCrypt pass of lowercase letters and number...
| it's so simply you will bang you head on the table. the masks you are looking for are:
my?dpass?dword?l?l?l
my?d?dpass?dword?l?l?l
my?d?d?dpass?dword?l?l?l
my?dpass?d?dword?l?l?l
my?d?dpass?d?... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
7,430 |
09-25-2014, 11:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: truecrypt with unknown algorithm
Post: RE: truecrypt with unknown algorithm
| Wait, that's not useful. If you do for example 6213, there's no need to do 6211, otherwise the entire system would make no sense. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
3,237 |
06-07-2017, 11:21 AM |
| |
|
Thread: trying to crack my onw WPA
Post: RE: trying to crack my onw WPA
| You can use aircrack -J option to let aircrack convert it to .hccap |
|
atom |
General Help
|
6 |
21,887 |
09-04-2013, 07:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Trying to figure out if I want to get a good brand 280 or the xfx 280x
Post: RE: Trying to figure out if I want to get a good b...
| the speed increase are mostly small but you get a ton of unpredictable problems that make you mad. all in all, overclocking is not what you want. |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
2 |
5,962 |
06-10-2014, 06:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Trying to increase performance of mask attack with a two character prefix
Post: RE: Trying to increase performance of mask attack ...
| The strategy to use -m 20 is the right one as -m 20 is around 10-100 times faster than -m 0 if the mask has a static prefix. The reason why this is not in your case is because your prefix is not entir... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
6,972 |
01-28-2018, 07:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Tutorial for adding hash formats?
Post: RE: Tutorial for adding hash formats?
| There's no such documentation yet, but feel free to write one. Usually just search for the hashmode and/or the hashmodes name in the files in include/* and src/* and add the GPU kernel folders and add... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
8,457 |
12-19-2015, 04:23 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Two hashes one result - why?
Post: RE: Two hashes one result - why?
| it's the same hash:
87487bb03941a7d1e702cc54ee81e7f61e5e46f554b47677279a59185baaba5f
and the same salt (only first 512 bit matter)
4b98bb3ebefd1c7195aa991916b7d7e683e992fd9a9d1355533456d62... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
8,330 |
03-04-2015, 10:38 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Two hashes one result - why?
Post: RE: Two hashes one result - why?
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
8,330 |
03-04-2015, 10:42 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Two questions about hash files and hybrid attack
Post: RE: Two questions about hash files and hybrid atta...
|
23732 Wrote: (09-08-2012, 10:29 PM)
--
When doing an attack against a file with multiple hashes, does oclHashcat-plus do the whole wordlist (or mask) against one hash at the time or does it one word ... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
5 |
11,843 |
09-08-2012, 10:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Two questions about hash files and hybrid attack
Post: RE: Two questions about hash files and hybrid atta...
| Yeah maybe. Make sure the sum of all rules is not > 500k. Tip: split them |
|
atom |
General Help
|
5 |
11,843 |
09-09-2012, 03:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Twofish + whirlpool hash
Post: RE: Twofish + whirlpool hash
| If you want performance there's no way around rewriting the crypto functions on gpgpu. Or you do it half-way. Do only the slow stuff on GPU and the rest on CPU with a crypto library. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
3 |
7,303 |
04-27-2015, 01:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: type example.dict
Post: RE: type example.dict
| There's two different ways to explain that there's two different ways to run hashcat. The only with the type command is a piped use-case. So whenever you have a program or generator that can produce t... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
5,327 |
03-16-2017, 10:21 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Ubuntu 10.10(64 bit)
Post: RE: Ubuntu 10.10(64 bit)
| what he meant is you have do run cudaHashcat-plus64 instead of oclHashcat-plus64 when working with nvidia. OCL is for AMD only. however, i cant recall seeing your card on any of the supported hardware... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
19,484 |
01-28-2012, 10:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeon" driver OK these days?
Post: RE: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeo...
| The most important question is, does the new OSS driver support OpenCL.
At this point, radeon-crimson-15.12-15.302-151217a-297685e.zip is the best driver you can get for oclHashcat on linux.
But... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
17 |
36,357 |
04-25-2016, 11:42 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeon" driver OK these days?
Post: RE: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeo...
| I've updated one of my development systems to Ubuntu 16.04 to clarify the situation.
As you can read about almost everywhere, fglrx is no longer supported. That's mostly because X11 is not compatib... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
17 |
36,357 |
04-25-2016, 08:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeon" driver OK these days?
Post: RE: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeo...
| But no one yet seems to have found out how to do it, even there's alot of discussion going on about this topic. It's like some hidden mysterium. A pretty demoralizing argument is this:
Quote:
--
... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
17 |
36,357 |
04-25-2016, 08:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeon" driver OK these days?
Post: RE: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeo...
| No, because there's no support for 290x / 7970. Most people have these cards. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
17 |
36,357 |
06-19-2016, 11:37 AM |
