|
Search Results
|
| Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Vega64 clCreateCommandQueue(): CL_OUT_OF_HOST_MEMORY
Post: RE: Vega64 clCreateCommandQueue(): CL_OUT_OF_HOST...
| Please retry with the latest beta from https://hashcat.net/beta/ |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
3,179 |
04-05-2019, 04:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Vega64 clCreateCommandQueue(): CL_OUT_OF_HOST_MEMORY
Post: RE: Vega64 clCreateCommandQueue(): CL_OUT_OF_HOST...
| Another try, did some change. Please retry with the latest beta from https://hashcat.net/beta/ |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
3,179 |
04-14-2019, 07:32 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Veracrypt assistance needed
Post: RE: Veracrypt assistance needed
| When you use -a 3 you don't need a wordlist. But if you specify an existing file it will be used as a maskfile. That's probably not what you want. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
3,044 |
11-12-2017, 09:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Veracrypt with multiple keyfiles
Post: RE: Veracrypt with multiple keyfiles
| It works the same way is it is implemented in VC. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
1,952 |
02-19-2020, 01:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: VeraCrypt with PIM/keyfile seems to be ignored
Post: RE: VeraCrypt with PIM/keyfile seems to be ignored
| What happens if you just use a single keyfile? Which PIM are you using? |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
13 |
5,712 |
03-10-2019, 06:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: VeraCrypt with PIM/keyfile seems to be ignored
Post: RE: VeraCrypt with PIM/keyfile seems to be ignored
| I can't reproduce this locally:
Code:
--
root@ht:~/hashcat# ./hashcat -m 13761 tools/vc_tests/hashcat_sha256_aes_boot_pim500.vc -a 3 hashca?l --veracrypt-pim 500
hashcat (v5.1.0-737-gbbae1b53... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
13 |
5,712 |
03-14-2019, 11:05 AM |
| |
|
Thread: version 0.13 still broken for Nvidia on Linux 32bit
Post: RE: version 0.13 still broken for Nvidia on Linux ...
| its already fixed in beta |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
6,342 |
03-06-2013, 11:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: version 0.13 still broken for Nvidia on Linux 32bit
Post: RE: version 0.13 still broken for Nvidia on Linux ...
| I will release it once I've implemented NetNTLMv1 and NetNTLMv2 into oclHashcat-plus.
For a workaround you just need to switch to a 64 bit OS. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
6,342 |
03-07-2013, 01:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: version 3.20 work with CL_UNKNOWN_ERROR
Post: RE: version 3.20 work with CL_UNKNOWN_ERROR
| Please reinstall driver with this documentation: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#i_may_have_the_wrong_driver_installed_what_should_i_do |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,306 |
12-08-2016, 12:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: version 3.20 work with CL_UNKNOWN_ERROR
Post: RE: version 3.20 work with CL_UNKNOWN_ERROR
| Yeah, the clEnqueueReadBuffer () is an error from OpenCL subsystem which comes with driver not hashcat. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,306 |
12-09-2016, 01:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./cudaHashcat64.bin)
Post: RE: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./...
| The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali) needs to update to more recent glibc, this is really annoying |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
34,165 |
06-12-2014, 06:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./cudaHashcat64.bin)
Post: RE: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./...
| ask The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali) dev's to do it |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
34,165 |
06-13-2014, 12:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./cudaHashcat64.bin)
Post: RE: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./...
| Can't you just pull out the required glibc files from the ubuntu package and then use LD_PRELOAD? |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
34,165 |
06-26-2014, 01:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: very long salt
Post: RE: very long salt
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
9,431 |
06-21-2012, 10:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: very long salt
Post: RE: very long salt
| Why? At least jtr has the same limitation:
salted_sha1_fmt_plug.c:#define PLAINTEXT_LENGTH (55-MAX_SALT_LEN) |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
9,431 |
06-21-2012, 02:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Very low hashrate on two 770s
Post: RE: Very low hashrate on two 770s
| Sounds about right, its pbkdf2-hmac-sha512. What let's you think it should be faster, or what did you expect? |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
6,675 |
05-19-2016, 08:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Very slow Hash
Post: RE: Very slow Hash
| Office 2013 Hash *is* that slow. Your CPU issue doesn't have an influence on it. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
3 |
4,619 |
03-18-2017, 04:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Very slow Hash
Post: RE: Very slow Hash
|
atom |
General Talk
|
3 |
4,619 |
03-20-2017, 09:56 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Very slow speed
Post: RE: Very slow speed
| 1. Do not confuse -d and -D, those are different options
2. To make use of all your devices, make sure to have the OpenCL runtime of all of them installed correctly |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
16 |
21,605 |
11-11-2016, 11:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Very slow speed
Post: RE: Very slow speed
| Please try again with latest hashcat beta, it will show us if your opencl installation is ok. You can find it here: https://hashcat.net/beta/ |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
16 |
21,605 |
11-11-2016, 09:17 PM |
