Search Results
|
Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
Post: RE: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
35,202 |
05-27-2012, 04:54 PM |
|
|
Thread: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
Post: RE: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
oclHashcat-lite and oclHashcat-plus share the same code when it comes to temperate management. Double check this issue again, pls. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
35,202 |
05-29-2012, 02:48 PM |
|
|
Thread: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
Post: RE: watchdog do not work in 0.09 ?
Hm the only change between them is that plus uses a new ADL library. In this case you have to wait for a new -lite version. It will be used automatically in the next version. Then check it again. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
22 |
35,202 |
05-30-2012, 09:48 AM |
|
|
Thread: WBB3 Woltlab Burning Board 3 with short salts: Line-length exception
Post: RE: WBB3 Woltlab Burning Board 3 with short salts:...
No, you can't reuse this unless the salt length is exactly the same. Otherwise it requires a special kernel module. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
6,578 |
12-29-2016, 11:15 AM |
|
|
Thread: WBB3 Woltlab Burning Board 3 with short salts: Line-length exception
Post: RE: WBB3 Woltlab Burning Board 3 with short salts:...
Please follow this: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#i_want_to_request_some_new_algorithms_or_features_how_can_i_accomplish_this
Happy new year to you too :) |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
6,578 |
12-30-2016, 11:34 AM |
|
|
Thread: We have the cards, now what?
Post: RE: We have the cards, now what?
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#does_the_pci-express_speed_have_any_influence_on_cracking_speed |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
5 |
7,415 |
01-03-2017, 10:32 PM |
|
|
Thread: WebEdition CMS
Post: RE: WebEdition CMS
If there is more demand I will add it to oclHashcat-plus. Please use epixoip's way in the meanwhile. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
7,853 |
11-19-2012, 12:49 PM |
|
|
Thread: Webserver hashcat.net now with IPv6
Post: RE: Webserver hashcat.net now with IPv6
should be fixed, thanks for report! |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
2 |
9,121 |
10-18-2015, 10:39 AM |
|
|
Thread: Webserver SSL enabled
Post: RE: Webserver SSL enabled
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
6 |
17,671 |
04-16-2012, 04:30 PM |
|
|
Thread: Webserver SSL enabled
Post: RE: Webserver SSL enabled
OK, I hope I fixed them all. Please try again |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
6 |
17,671 |
04-19-2012, 08:49 PM |
|
|
Thread: Webserver SSL enabled
Post: RE: Webserver SSL enabled
We got our server cert verified by RapidSSL. Big Thanks to @dakykilla and @purehate_ from Team Hashcat!!! |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
6 |
17,671 |
04-23-2012, 11:02 AM |
|
|
Thread: Website and Wiki Request
Post: RE: Website and Wiki Request
theoretically, i would agree. but there are people that find self signed certificate more insecure than unencrypted streams at all. from an unskilled view, it looks more suspicious because of the brow... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
3 |
7,351 |
11-18-2011, 10:37 AM |
|
|
Thread: Website left-side verticle menu problem
Post: RE: Website left-side verticle menu problem
yeah i did not spend so much time on the webpage. if someone is interessted in help pls PM me. |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
1 |
7,317 |
01-31-2012, 11:26 AM |
|
|
Thread: Weird client behaviour in Brain Attack
Post: RE: Weird client behaviour in Brain Attack
Please provide all information like commandline setup and files so that we can reproduce locally. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
1,811 |
02-20-2019, 08:47 AM |
|
|
Thread: Weird problem with -m 400
Post: RE: Weird problem with -m 400
rejects are usually the result of incomaptible words in the dictionary. if the whole dictionary is rejected its mostly because of a bad newline seperator. for example, if the dictionary was stored on ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
8,880 |
01-21-2012, 09:54 AM |
|
|
Thread: Weird problem with -m 400
Post: RE: Weird problem with -m 400
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
8,880 |
02-13-2012, 10:54 AM |
|
|
Thread: Weird result with MSSQL 2000 mode 131
Post: RE: Weird result with MSSQL 2000 mode 131
You're right, it should. I've never seen this block being filled with data (not being zero). Please create GitHub issue. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
1,556 |
08-22-2019, 11:25 AM |
|
|
Thread: Ugh Help PLEASE!!! i cant get hashcat to work
Post: RE: Well i followed all the videos and this is wha...
something really makes no sense on this. especially not using md5($pass.$salt) in combination with -e brute-vbulletin.salt
what exactly do you want to do? |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
2 |
8,830 |
10-08-2010, 04:26 PM |
|
|
Thread: What a Hash is this?
Post: RE: What a Hash is this?
its a MD5 of an empty string |
|
atom |
General Help
|
1 |
5,517 |
03-28-2012, 10:08 AM |
|
|
Thread: What about --increment for bruteforcing ?
Post: RE: What about --increment for bruteforcing ?
i will add --increment in a later version. till that its the only solution. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,723 |
01-04-2012, 11:21 PM |