Search Results
|
Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: what is wrong with these rules and attack?
Post: RE: what is wrong with these rules and attack?
davidonpda Wrote:
--
oclHashcat.exe example.hash -o output.txt names.dict names.dict --rule-left="$a$n$d" --rule-right="$4$e$v$e$r"
I hash some names to test, bobandmarie4ever and some others... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
6,178 |
07-07-2010, 08:37 AM |
|
|
Thread: What kind of hash is this?
Post: RE: What kind of hash is this?
The char = on the end mostly points to Base64 |
|
atom |
General Help
|
6 |
12,600 |
10-12-2012, 10:11 AM |
|
|
Thread: What kind of hash is this?
Post: RE: What kind of hash is this?
can be anything. you will need to reverse engineer the algorithm used |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
8 |
16,902 |
09-22-2014, 11:50 AM |
|
|
Thread: what language is hashcat written in?
Post: RE: what language is oclhashcat written in?
Hashcat CPU has parts of ASM.
For oclHashcat-* its plain C for the host-code part, OpenCL for AMD kernels, CUDA for NV kernels. Both OpenCL and CUDA and nearly 1:1 to C. There are also some parts of ... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
9 |
21,543 |
10-26-2012, 10:15 AM |
|
|
Thread: What linux distro do you recommend?
Post: RE: What linux distro do you recommend?
not sure if the distribution make a diffrence. ubuntu 9.x has been tested a lot and it works fine on there. more important is that the cpus support sse2 :)
$ grep sse2 /proc/cpuinfo |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
8 |
17,362 |
06-04-2010, 01:36 PM |
|
|
Thread: What linux distro do you recommend?
Post: RE: What linux distro do you recommend?
unrar x hashcat-0.34.rar
./hashcat-cli.bin -h |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
8 |
17,362 |
06-10-2010, 11:02 AM |
|
|
Thread: What linux distro do you recommend?
Post: RE: What linux distro do you recommend?
hashcat is a 32 bit only app and you are on 64 bit linux. so you need to install 32 bit compatibility libraries. maybe this helps: sudo apt-get install ia32-libs |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
8 |
17,362 |
06-10-2010, 08:06 PM |
|
|
Thread: What means "1024/4096 MB allocatable"
Post: RE: What means "1024/4096 MB allocatable"
OpenCL has a bit a strange policy on memory allocation:
Quote:
--
Max size of memory object allocation in bytes. The minimum value is max (1/4th of CL_DEVICE_GLOBAL_MEM_SIZE, 128*1024*1024)
--... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
4,416 |
06-30-2016, 08:53 AM |
|
|
Thread: What mode is md5(md5($pass).$salt) salt is > 30char and < 30char
Post: RE: What mode is md5(md5($pass).$salt) salt is > ...
I think he's talking about cracking vbull hashes. You can crack them with hashcat v4.0.1 in mode 2611 (not 2711) when not using -O. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
3,046 |
11-20-2017, 08:48 PM |
|
|
Thread: What would be the most efficient way to solve this?
Post: RE: What would be the most efficient way to solve ...
For full speed this requires a special designed hash-mode. If you don't mind about performance simply pipe it.
Quote:
--
perl -MDigest::SHA -ne 'printf "%s\n", substr (Digest::SHA::sha1_hex ($_)... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
2 |
4,653 |
11-07-2014, 09:08 AM |
|
|
Thread: What's "xxx ms" in Speed.Dev ?
Post: RE: What's "xxx ms" in Speed.Dev ?
I've explained that in detail in the hashcat v3.00 release notes. If you don't work on the system -w 3 is fine. With -w 3 it should be ~96ms, but that's possible only with enough amplifiers. With stra... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
5,303 |
07-06-2016, 09:13 AM |
|
|
Thread: What's "xxx ms" in Speed.Dev ?
Post: RE: What's "xxx ms" in Speed.Dev ?
You will not be able to do anything on the desktop. I'd still recommend -w 3, it has several advantages |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
5,303 |
07-08-2016, 10:04 AM |
|
|
Thread: what's the default mask of lite when cracking DES
Post: RE: what's the default mask of lite when cracking ...
with oclHashcat-lite v0.09:
Code:
--
-1 ?l?d?u
-2 ?l?d
-3 ?l?d*!$@_
?1?2?2?2?2?2?2?3?3?3?3?d?d?d?d
--
with oclHashcat-lite v0.10 this changes to:
Code:
--
-1 ae10i2onrls938t45m67c... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
2 |
6,995 |
06-10-2012, 03:51 PM |
|
|
Thread: What's wrong with AMD & RAR3-HP
Post: RE: What's wrong with AMD & RAR3-HP
Please try to reproduce with latest beta (88) and report back |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
9,372 |
02-01-2017, 12:12 PM |
|
|
Thread: What's wrong with AMD & RAR3-HP
Post: RE: What's wrong with AMD & RAR3-HP
This is another episode of the great AMD OpenCL runtime! I've just tested it locally with my NV GTX1080 and AMD RX480 with the same hashcat version (v3.30-157):
NV:
Quote:
--
$RAR3$*0*b14426c0cf7c9... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
9,372 |
02-13-2017, 11:23 AM |
|
|
Thread: What's wrong with AMD & RAR3-HP
Post: RE: What's wrong with AMD & RAR3-HP
I've found a workaround using a volatile variable, but I can't say how much it dropped the performance because the value before was wrong because of that OpenCL runtime error. Anyway, it should work o... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
9,372 |
02-13-2017, 12:41 PM |
|
|
Thread: what's wrong with the third Card?
Post: RE: what's wrong with the third Card?
Looks strange, no idea. Maybe reinstall driver, but use this documentation: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#i_may_have_the_wrong_driver_installed_what_should_i_do |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
4,869 |
12-08-2016, 12:25 PM |
|
|
Thread: When CPU at 100%, loss of ocl performance ?
Post: RE: When CPU at 100%, loss of ocl performance ?
Propably because of host process can't load words from dictionary. You might want to retry with -a 3 and see if it still happens. If no, then that's the reason. |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
6,747 |
12-22-2013, 02:58 PM |
|
|
Thread: When is all the Truecrypt encryption ciphers available?
Post: RE: When is all the Truecrypt encryption ciphers a...
Till today, only 3 user requested keyfile support for other algorithm support less than 10. |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
6,391 |
09-21-2015, 09:44 AM |
|
|
Thread: Where can I download v0.07?
Post: RE: Where can I download v0.07?
Older version do not work anymore because of the timebomb, thats why I removed them from download section. There is no way around updating to a more recent GPU. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
1 |
4,180 |
11-26-2012, 11:21 AM |