|
Search Results
|
| Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Why is crossfire slower than a single card?
Post: RE: Why is crossfire slower than a single card?
|
Quote:
--
Got it extracted properly, it only sees one GPU out of crossfire mode, and runs NTLM on this thing @ about 630Mh/s when run with '-m 1000 + hash' and no other options.
--
the most common... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
12 |
26,052 |
12-07-2011, 12:28 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why is the gtx 570 so much faster than gtx 460 with HC?
Post: RE: Why is the gtx 570 so much faster than gtx 460...
| Crypto operations do not utilize instructions that require floating point operations (FLOPS). |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
991 |
08-14-2019, 11:03 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Why is WPA/WPA2 maxlength limited to 15?
Post: RE: Why is WPA/WPA2 maxlength limited to 15?
| There will be no speed loss for slow hashes like WPA/WPA2 |
|
atom |
General Help
|
8 |
14,636 |
06-23-2013, 10:06 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Why is WPA/WPA2 maxlength limited to 15?
Post: RE: Why is WPA/WPA2 maxlength limited to 15?
| It's already working. Just wait for release. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
8 |
14,636 |
06-25-2013, 09:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Why max 128
Post: RE: Why max 128
| It's better to have a maximum no one can reach than saying there's no limit. You can increase that number yourself when compiling from source |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
3,360 |
02-05-2016, 10:00 AM |
| |
|
Thread: why not crack MD5 16bit ?
Post: RE: why not crack MD5 16bit ?
| there is the special hash-type -m 5100 for this, it works for ABxx, xBCx and xxCD |
|
atom |
General Help
|
6 |
12,896 |
05-16-2014, 09:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: why not crack MD5 16bit ?
Post: RE: why not crack MD5 16bit ?
|
atom |
General Help
|
6 |
12,896 |
05-19-2014, 09:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: why not support md5(unix) FreeBSD MD5 hash in oclHashcat-lite
Post: RE: why not support md5(unix) FreeBSD MD5 hash in ...
| not needed. oclHashcat-plus already supports md5(unix) FreeBSD MD5. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
1 |
7,369 |
09-23-2011, 12:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why NVidia gpus are slower in computing
Post: RE: Why NVidia gpus are slower in computing
| The main reasons for AMD cards are faster than NV cards in general are:
- AMD GPU has more raw integer power (more SP), floating point is not important in crypto.
- AMD GPU/XOP CPU have a much better... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
4 |
13,928 |
12-09-2012, 11:29 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Why run wpaclean when its' output file isn't used?
Post: RE: Why run wpaclean when its' output file isn't u...
| Thanks for the hint, updated wiki |
|
atom |
General Help
|
3 |
7,195 |
11-26-2012, 11:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Why the .pot?
Post: RE: Why the .pot?
| The main reason for having a potfile in oclHashcat-plus is for --show and --left. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
2 |
7,703 |
05-03-2013, 07:23 PM |
| |
|
Thread: why use 2x HD5970 sametime just one work?
Post: RE: why use 2x HD5970 sametime just one work?
| fix your driver installation to get 2nd hd5970 working. do not enable crossfire. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
10,762 |
02-22-2011, 03:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why would the list run only on Linux?
Post: RE: Why would the list run only on Linux?
| Maybe the hashes which you're trying to crack were not created on a server using utf8 but some codepage/iso encoding. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
6 |
6,503 |
01-01-2017, 02:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Why would the list run only on Linux?
Post: RE: Why would the list run only on Linux?
| Hashcat uses binary loading of the wordlist, there's no functions used that somehow do a textual interpretation of the data (and automatically convert them). Therefore it makes absolute no sense what ... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
6 |
6,503 |
01-02-2017, 10:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Why would the list run only on Linux?
Post: RE: Why would the list run only on Linux?
| I don't know, I find this really hard to understand to what you said in the beginning:
Quote:
--
For some reasons I have to use hashcat on both The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
6 |
6,503 |
01-03-2017, 11:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Will my laptop support Hashcat?
Post: RE: Will my laptop support Hashcat?
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
3,618 |
11-13-2016, 10:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Will oclhashcat-lite v0.8 work with HD7970 anyone test ??
Post: RE: Will oclhashcat-lite v0.8 work with HD7970 any...
| Yes, i had it tested by one User who already got one of the cards. It crashed for some unknown reason. That might be related to an old driver i used for compiling or not. I will try to get one of thes... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
3 |
9,297 |
01-06-2012, 11:13 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Will the Oclhashcat-plus support intel integrated GPU HD4000?
Post: RE: Will the Oclhashcat-plus support intel integra...
| hd4xxx are not fully supported by OpenCL. Important instructions and fast memory (shared) access do not work. Even if it would work, it would be slow. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
13,645 |
09-21-2012, 09:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Win7 32, Ati 5850, catalyst 14.9 but ERROR: clGetDeviceIDs() -1
Post: RE: Win7 32, Ati 5850, catalyst 14.9 but ERROR: cl...
| OK, after some debugging we found out the problem is related to GPU_NUM_COMPUTE_RINGS which we originally added to workaround some Catalyst 14.12 problems. Since we dropped support for catalyst 14.12 ... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
10,167 |
01-17-2015, 09:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Win8.1 64, Ati 5670, catalyst 14.9 but ERROR: clGetDeviceIDs() -1
Post: RE: Win8.1 64, Ati 5670, catalyst 14.9 but ERROR: ...
| https://i.imgur.com/YgfmGK6.png |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
4,644 |
02-16-2015, 10:11 AM |
