Search Results
|
Post
[desc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: [hashcat-0.37] bug in substitute rule
Post: RE: [hashcat-0.37] bug in substitute rule
thats right! thanks for reporting :) btw i have already fixed this in v0.38 beta. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
1 |
6,019 |
09-11-2011, 12:03 PM |
|
|
Thread: [hashcat] Add -j and -k parameters
Post: RE: [hashcat] Add -j and -k parameters
Please use the ticket tracker https://hashcat.net/trac/ |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
9 |
25,605 |
01-21-2013, 12:00 PM |
|
|
Thread: [hashcat] MD5 frrom Linux
Post: RE: [hashcat] MD5 frrom Linux
$2a$ is not supported, its blowfish not MD5 |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
1 |
7,375 |
02-13-2011, 12:33 PM |
|
|
Thread: [HD6950]benchmark
Post: RE: [HD6950]benchmark
|
atom |
Hardware
|
2 |
8,493 |
05-22-2012, 10:47 PM |
|
|
Thread: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
Post: RE: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
32 byte salt is not supported since v0.24. max 31 byte. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
40,947 |
01-27-2011, 10:50 AM |
|
|
Thread: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
Post: RE: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
i forgot about the joomla effect. you are right, they have 32 bytes. i will bring it back in next version. but yeah, it will require an additional if () so the performance will drop a little bit. its ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
40,947 |
02-20-2011, 09:57 AM |
|
|
Thread: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
Post: RE: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
40,947 |
12-16-2011, 01:12 PM |
|
|
Thread: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
Post: RE: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
40,947 |
12-16-2011, 03:44 PM |
|
|
Thread: [HELP] Read russian,arabic, chinese,ecc.. from a wordlist
Post: RE: [HELP] Read russian,arabic, chinese,ecc.. from...
then you need to guess, try all encodings |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
8,309 |
04-05-2015, 11:31 PM |
|
|
Thread: [help] Unknown option --output-file= "error"
Post: RE: [help] Unknown option --output-file= "error"
It's simply
--outfile=FILE |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
9 |
12,627 |
02-13-2015, 04:59 PM |
|
|
Thread: [LM] Append a '0' with rules file ?!
Post: RE: [LM] Append a '0' with rules file ?!
Damn LM, the fact that this is the only known two-in-one hash generates lots of problems. This actually looks like a bug, but i am pretty busy with markov stuff right now. I will take a look at this l... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
17,468 |
06-21-2012, 10:11 AM |
|
|
Thread: [LM] Append a '0' with rules file ?!
Post: RE: [LM] Append a '0' with rules file ?!
Sounds good yeah, I think I will do that. Thanks. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
17,468 |
06-23-2012, 11:20 AM |
|
|
Thread: [LM] Append a '0' with rules file ?!
Post: RE: [LM] Append a '0' with rules file ?!
You could call it a missing feature, since 32-char LMs actually are 2 hashes not 1 hash. But calling it a bug would be wrong. Plus you have the possibility to manually workaround. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
10 |
17,468 |
09-21-2012, 09:55 AM |
|
|
Thread: [NEW Problem]dual-CPU hashca3.0 for help
Post: RE: [NEW Problem]dual-CPU hashca3.0 for help
Please stick to 7bit characters for the pathname, it will save you a lot of headache. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
8,612 |
07-06-2016, 11:49 AM |
|
|
Thread: [Newb] Mask attack on FNV1a-32
Post: RE: [Newb] Mask attack on FNV1a-32
There's no way to get back the original string, since there's too much data lost. All you can do is to collide it. Since it's a 32 bit checksum, you will be flooded with possible collisions, even on C... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
2 |
2,437 |
07-14-2018, 11:03 PM |
|
|
Thread: [oclHashcat+] Blowfish(UNIX)
Post: RE: [oclHashcat+] Blowfish(UNIX)
Done with oclHashcat-plus v0.09: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1541.html
Thread closed |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
10,998 |
09-07-2012, 05:12 PM |
|
|
Thread: [OclHashcat+] sha512(UNIX)
Post: RE: [OclHashcat+] sha512(UNIX)
Done with oclHashcat-plus v0.09: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1541.html
Thread closed |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
11,112 |
09-07-2012, 05:12 PM |
|
|
Thread: [oclHashcat+] Support for MySQL & SHA1 ?
Post: RE: [oclHashcat+] Support for MySQL & SHA1 ?
yes, this is something i can do if there is more interesst in it |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
8 |
17,323 |
02-12-2011, 08:34 AM |
|
|
Thread: [oclHashcat+] Support for MySQL & SHA1 ?
Post: RE: [oclHashcat+] Support for MySQL & SHA1 ?
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
8 |
17,323 |
02-13-2011, 08:38 AM |
|
|
Thread: [oclHashcat+] Support for MySQL & SHA1 ?
Post: RE: [oclHashcat+] Support for MySQL & SHA1 ?
done. latest oclHashcat-plus supports this. thread closed. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
8 |
17,323 |
11-19-2011, 07:34 PM |