|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: New Oclhashcat with keepass - 0 speed
Post: RE: New Oclhashcat with keepass - 0 speed
| 15081984 iterations, wth!!
It's simply slower than 1H/s |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
6,813 |
04-10-2016, 12:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Oclhashcat with keepass - 0 speed
Post: RE: New Oclhashcat with keepass - 0 speed
| Yeah, that's right. It's actually faster than 0H/s. Showing 0H/s is not the true speed. The best way to find out is to comment out this line:
Quote:
--
if (rec_ms > SPEED_MAXAGE) continue;
--
and... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
6,813 |
04-10-2016, 03:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New ocl-lite new command line can give anyone example ?
Post: RE: New ocl-lite new command line can give anyone ...
| just the result, one per line. please email me the stuff |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
27 |
49,074 |
06-30-2012, 09:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New ocl-lite new command line can give anyone example ?
Post: RE: New ocl-lite new command line can give anyone ...
| Yes I've got a list of 100k results but is it yours? I got it from Mr.Ultimate. Thats all I have. I've generated an .hcstat file out of it. I can send you the file if Mr.Ultimate approves. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
27 |
49,074 |
07-04-2012, 04:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New ocl-lite new command line can give anyone example ?
Post: RE: New ocl-lite new command line can give anyone ...
| Yes its likely, but nobody here cracks SL3, so how can we know? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
27 |
49,074 |
07-07-2012, 04:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New ISP
Post: RE: New ISP
| No problems so far. Looks good, thanks! |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
2 |
4,965 |
11-20-2017, 08:39 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
|
martin.po21 Wrote: (02-06-2017, 11:39 PM)
--
However, I tested this on a capture file I already cracked and therefor I know capture is indeed valid (ATT?d?d?d network with default pass of 10 digits)-... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-07-2017, 11:28 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
|
rico Wrote: (02-07-2017, 01:01 AM)
--
Great stuff, handshake capturing always a tricky business. I just gave cap2hccapx a quick spin but didn't have much luck either I'm afraid. cap2hccapx seems to i... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-07-2017, 11:49 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| After some testing, that error:
Quote:
--
Invalid hccapx eapol size
--
and/or
Quote:
--
Invalid hccapx signature
--
is somehow related to windows beta binaries. We'll try to fix. |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-07-2017, 12:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| I've just upload hashcat beta 104. With it, you should be able to load the hccapx on windows, too. If it works I don't need the .cap. |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-07-2017, 12:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| Also note that this feature is kind of unique in the WPA/WPA2 cracking world. There's no other cracker (both commercial and non-commercial) that combines the packets in such a way that they produce at... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-08-2017, 09:45 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| Hehe, I guess in that case it will not take long to update it again, allowing it for combining of packets :) |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-09-2017, 10:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
|
abdou99 Wrote: (02-10-2017, 02:29 PM)
--
If you are saying that both values: 0 and 1 are crackable
so what's the news?
value = 0 ==> 50% Crackable
value = 1 ==> 100% Crackable
is that what are ... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-10-2017, 03:09 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| You can use the 3rd (optional) parameter of cap2hccapx to select a specific ESSID only. |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-15-2017, 09:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| Yeah, I understood that. It's very likely wpaclean will break you cap (as aircrack-ng -J does) so there's no easy way to filter it. That's why I said that cap2hccapx supports filtering. He just need t... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-15-2017, 09:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| That's a feature, I explained it in the initial post. We also want to be able to crack the password the user set, not just the password on the AP (for man-in-the-middle attacks). Please re-read the po... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
02-16-2017, 09:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| For short readers: Everything is fine here. For all others, here's our analysis:
The Handshake in the cap has the following entries:
M1 and M2 from the first handshake
M1, M2, M3 and M4 from the se... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
03-10-2017, 11:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New hccapx format explained
Post: RE: New hccapx format explained
| That's some local problem on your side then. Works for everyone else. Read this: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#i_may_have_the_wrong_driver_installed_what_should_i_do ... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
49 |
179,647 |
03-11-2017, 09:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Hashing Algorithm Request
Post: RE: New Hashing Algorithm Request
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
7,169 |
10-01-2012, 10:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New hashcat crash in XP
Post: RE: New hashcat crash in XP
| Can't reproduce on Linux 64, can't reproduce on Win 32 :( |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
1 |
2,548 |
01-09-2013, 10:30 AM |
