|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: new hashcat 3 does not work anymore on my nvidia
Post: RE: new hashcat 3 does not work anymore on my nvid...
| The 5xx series is too old and too slow. Best way to solve this is to upgrade to 1. new driver 2. new hardware with at least maxwell chipset |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
4,666 |
10-13-2016, 04:19 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Hash Function
Post: RE: New Hash Function
| Not sure if this is the one you are talking about: https://github.com/b/ION/blob/master/ams/library/nullcrypt.c
Quote:
--
memcpy(cyphertext, plaintext, ptlen);
--
In that case I'd say it's s... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
3,331 |
08-05-2015, 02:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New feature sneakpeak: multirules
Post: RE: New feature sneakpeak: multirules
|
Quote:
--
... the possibility to include a directory instead of a file.
--
the idea of having presets is really nice. adding this feature is not a big problem. ACCEPTED.
Quote:
--
... now *-plu... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
16,801 |
12-02-2011, 01:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New clause § 6 in EULA
Post: RE: New clause § 6 in EULA
| Sure, I am open to suggestions |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
2 |
12,201 |
07-01-2012, 11:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New card and dont work
Post: RE: New card and dont work
| I recommend to upgrade your Windows. AMD said they will drop Windows XP support with next SDK.
See here, Page 3: https://developer.amd.com/sdks/AMDAPPSDK/assets/AMD_APP_SDK_Release_Notes_Developer.pdf
|
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
6,719 |
03-07-2012, 11:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New card and dont work
Post: RE: New card and dont work
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
6,719 |
03-09-2012, 08:31 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New bug
Post: RE: New bug
| need a dictionary to reproduce. you are using -m 2 mode? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
15,365 |
07-02-2010, 07:34 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New bug
Post: RE: New bug
| ok. i also tried it with some of my dictionaries but none of them found a password. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
15,365 |
07-02-2010, 08:33 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New bug
Post: RE: New bug
| root@sf:~/oclHashcat-0.22# echo aaa > word
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-0.22# cat word
aaa
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-0.22# echo -n aaaaaaaaa | md5sum
552e6a972... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
15,365 |
07-02-2010, 08:51 AM |
| |
|
Thread: New bug
Post: RE: New bug
| not sure. if it does not fit, use rapidshare or something similar |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
15,365 |
07-02-2010, 07:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New bug
Post: RE: New bug
| anyway, thanks for reporting! i will also keep an eye on it. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
15,365 |
07-03-2010, 06:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Brute Force Attack
Post: RE: New Brute Force Attack
| this is absolutly _not_ working like CPU hashcat :-)
check out: https://hashcat.net/wiki/mask_attack
there is no --increment, so the --bf-pw-min is always the same as the --bf-pw-max. i will add ... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
4 |
14,126 |
12-31-2011, 09:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Brute Force Attack
Post: RE: New Brute Force Attack
|
Hash-IT Wrote: (12-31-2011, 09:36 PM)
--
I got confused as I followed this (https://hashcat.net/wiki/brute_force_attack) link
Posted here (https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-761-post-3781.html#pid378... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
4 |
14,126 |
12-31-2011, 10:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: RE: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
| Kernel Developer:
There's two changes you typically need to apply to your kernel.
1. Replace "salt_pos" with "SALT_POS"
2. Replace "digests_offset" with "DIGESTS_OFFSET"
That's it. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,762 |
09-29-2020, 04:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: RE: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
|
royce Wrote: (09-29-2020, 05:03 PM)
--
Wow, this is going to be a game-changer!
If feasible, one UX request: Please do what JtR does here and warn the user about any "calculatable" efficiency thresh... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,762 |
09-30-2020, 12:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: RE: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
|
Peanutbutter1 Wrote: (09-29-2020, 05:20 PM)
--
This is awesome. Is there any interest in a variation of this attack that, instead of using rules on each individual hash's associated hint, you can pro... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,762 |
09-30-2020, 12:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: RE: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
|
AndrewOnDev Wrote: (09-29-2020, 08:14 PM)
--
If this is not a correct place to report some issues/make suggestions then please let me know and I'll shut up :D
I noticed that this mode doesn't real... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,762 |
09-30-2020, 12:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: RE: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
|
KillerCube Wrote: (09-29-2020, 08:51 PM)
--
I think this new attack method is awesome and I would also like to be able to use something like
Code:
--
mypass,passtest,passguess:
--
Of course using... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,762 |
09-30-2020, 12:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
Post: RE: New Attack-Mode: Association Attack
|
AndrewOnDev Wrote: (09-30-2020, 01:44 PM)
--
atom Wrote: (09-30-2020, 12:16 PM)
--
AndrewOnDev Wrote: (09-29-2020, 08:14 PM)
--
If this is not a correct place to report some issues/make suggestions... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
21 |
3,762 |
09-30-2020, 02:35 PM |
| |
|
Thread: New attack on WPA/WPA2 using PMKID
Post: RE: New attack on WPA/WPA2 using PMKID
|
Quote:
--
I guess, consumer grade hardware won't be attackable using this tool, because these simply do not perform PMKID caching (i guess). I did a quick test using an AVM Fritz!Box (popular model... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
187 |
1,293,346 |
08-08-2018, 11:16 AM |
