|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: my oclhashcat not breake same passwords as hashcat-.041
Post: RE: my oclhashcat not breake same passwords as has...
| maybe you are not using catalyst 12.8. do not use lower or higher versions, should be exactly 12.8 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,111 |
11-27-2012, 05:16 PM |
| |
|
Thread: my Geforce Gtx 670 doesn't work with oclHashcat-plus-0.09
Post: RE: my Geforce Gtx 670 doesn't work with oclHashca...
| Update driver please, looks like Backtrack ones are outdated |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
16 |
32,352 |
09-20-2012, 10:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: my Geforce Gtx 670 doesn't work with oclHashcat-plus-0.09
Post: RE: my Geforce Gtx 670 doesn't work with oclHashca...
| Try with -n 1 --gpu-loops 1 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
16 |
32,352 |
09-20-2012, 11:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: my Geforce Gtx 670 doesn't work with oclHashcat-plus-0.09
Post: RE: my Geforce Gtx 670 doesn't work with oclHashca...
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
16 |
32,352 |
09-21-2012, 09:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: my Geforce Gtx 670 doesn't work with oclHashcat-plus-0.09
Post: RE: my Geforce Gtx 670 doesn't work with oclHashca...
| Your card is in the CUDA supported list: https://developer.nvidia.com/cuda/cuda-gpus
Try again with Ubuntu and tell me if it worked. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
16 |
32,352 |
09-21-2012, 12:55 PM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
| now thats a nice report mastercracker. i need to reproduce some of them while others i know are already known:
Quote:
--
- Status bar at the bottom not always appearing (really intermittent).
... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-05-2012, 08:41 AM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
|
mastercracker Wrote: (08-07-2012, 04:48 AM)
--
For the test-plus.pl, some of the perl modules are a pain to install when you don't know how to do it properly (I learned the hard way what is the easy ... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-09-2012, 11:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
| wonderful report. will work on it |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-10-2012, 11:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
| reproduced:
Quote:
--
- For -m 10 md5($pass.$salt), Bruteforce of length 2 is not working.
- For -m 30 md5(unicode($pass).$salt), Length 15 does not work on all modes
- For -m 30 md5(unicode($pass)... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-10-2012, 11:37 AM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
| Fixed:
Quote:
--
- For -m 10 md5($pass.$salt), Bruteforce of length 2 is not working.
- For -m 30 md5(unicode($pass).$salt), Length 2 does not work on bruteforce.
- For -m 110 sha1($pass.$salt), Br... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-10-2012, 12:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
| Fixed:
Quote:
--
Prompt is not shown sometimes
--
|
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-10-2012, 12:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
| Left:
Quote:
--
- For -m 30 md5(unicode($pass).$salt), Length 15 does not work on all modes
- For -m 111 nsldaps, SSHA-1(Base64), Netscape LDAP SSHA, Dictionary attack works (-a 0) but all the othe... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-10-2012, 12:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
| Fixed:
Quote:
--
- For -m 30 md5(unicode($pass).$salt), Length 15 does not work on all modes
--
Left:
Quote:
--
- For -m 111 nsldaps, SSHA-1(Base64), Netscape LDAP SSHA, Dictionary attack work... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-10-2012, 12:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
| Fixed:
Quote:
--
- For -m 111 nsldaps, SSHA-1(Base64), Netscape LDAP SSHA, Dictionary attack works (-a 0) but all the other attack mode fails.
- For -m 1710 sha512($pass.$salt), dictionary worked f... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-10-2012, 01:50 PM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
| I have uploaded a new beta b43, please retry everything (not just the stuff that was marked as buggy) because of bugfixes new errors can appear somewhere. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-10-2012, 01:51 PM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for v0.09b41
Post: RE: My bugs for v0.09b41
| ok i will close this thread, lets continue on the v44 |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
18 |
16,154 |
08-12-2012, 06:29 PM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
Post: RE: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
| did you remove all *.kernel files from kernels\4098\ before you tested? |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
10,283 |
08-06-2012, 02:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
Post: RE: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
|
mastercracker Wrote: (08-06-2012, 07:42 PM)
--
atom Wrote: (08-06-2012, 02:08 PM)
--
did you remove all *.kernel files from kernels\4098\ before you tested?
--
No. Are we supposed to do that? I ju... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
10,283 |
08-09-2012, 11:11 AM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
Post: RE: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
| There is a new BETA version up, please retry everything. I did several changes. The BUG with the PROMPT still exists, I will fix this later |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
10,283 |
08-09-2012, 11:12 AM |
| |
|
Thread: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
Post: RE: My bugs for 0.09b41 -- The AMD side
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
10 |
10,283 |
08-12-2012, 06:39 PM |
