|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: mode 8700 (Lotus Notes/Domino 6) doesn't work at v.3.xx
Post: RE: mode 8700 (Lotus Notes/Domino 6) doesn't work ...
| Can't reproduce, works fine:
Quote:
--
root@ht:~/hashcat# ./hashcat -m 8700 hash wl
hashcat (v3.10-8-gb57235f) starting...
OpenCL Platform #1: NVIDIA Corporation
========================... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
3,862 |
08-27-2016, 10:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: [solved] mode 6223 (TrueCrypt 'XTS 1536 bit all') not cracking cascades in v3.00
Post: RE: mode 6223 (TrueCrypt 'XTS 1536 bit all') not c...
| Seems to be a bug in -m 6223. Other modes work just fine. Here's a full set of example headers for all possible modes: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=example_hashes for testing. Please open an i... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
3,750 |
08-12-2016, 05:57 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
Post: RE: Mode 22000 Bad file descriptor
| As long as -m 22000 has backward compatibility mode enabled, the mode is internally set to binary hashfile. This mean you can actually use a .hccapx as well as a PMKID hashlist as well as the new -m 2... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
10 |
3,159 |
01-18-2020, 02:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: mode 11600 (7z) not working?
Post: RE: mode 11600 (7z) not working?
| I can reproduce this on my local setup, but this is the wrong place to report. Please post an issue on github. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
3,203 |
09-08-2016, 08:10 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Mobility HD 5650 oclHashcat-lite works but oclHashcat+ not?
Post: RE: Mobility HD 5650 oclHashcat-lite works but ocl...
| oclHashcat-lite runs a BF by default with a default mask. oclHashcat-plus does not have such a thing, thats why you have to tell oclHashcat-plus what to do. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
1 |
5,692 |
05-03-2012, 10:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: mixed GPU - Just for the fun
Post: RE: mixed GPU - Just for the fun
|
atom |
General Talk
|
4 |
9,346 |
01-28-2013, 10:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Mix of single and multi byte in wordlist
Post: RE: Mix of single and multi byte in wordlist
| You can add utf-8 german umlauts by using two function calls:
Quote:
--
root@ht:~/hashcat# cat rule
$\xc3 $\xa4
root@ht:~/hashcat# echo test | ./hashcat --stdout -r rule
testä
--
|
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
4,579 |
06-24-2018, 03:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Mix of single and multi byte in wordlist
Post: RE: Mix of single and multi byte in wordlist
| From technical perspective there's no problem with utf8 used with PBKDF2 (the KDF of WPA/WPA2). The same goes with passwords < length 8. If a client or AP ignores the policies from WPA on passwords it... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
6 |
4,579 |
06-28-2018, 04:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
| what chort says is correct, however oclHashcat-lite uses --increment mode by default. Even if his mask is set to 8x?l, it will start with 1x?l and iterate through 7x?l and ignores the 8th ?l. This is ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,307 |
02-07-2012, 10:03 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
| i can not reproduce this:
Quote:
--
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-lite-0.10# ./oclHashcat-lite64.bin -m 3000 e52cac67419a9a224a3b108f3fa6cb6d -1 ?l ?1?1?1?1?1?1?1?1
oclHashcat-lite v0.10 by atom starting...... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,307 |
02-08-2012, 11:34 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
| i need something to reproduce, otherwise i cant fix it (if there is anything to fix).
yes, ?u will be translated into ?l and if both exists, it will get "merged", so the charset stays at 26 even if y... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,307 |
02-08-2012, 04:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
| dont like the way how lm is done in lite, plus will be different. suggestions are welcome |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,307 |
02-09-2012, 10:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
| OK! check out the new oclHashcat-plus beta in /beta. I have implented it that way. It is writing the cracked halfes to outfile/screen AND to hashcat.pot and you can run at any time:
Quote:
--
oclH... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,307 |
02-09-2012, 06:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
|
mastercracker Wrote: (02-10-2012, 03:35 PM)
--
1) When you do the --show, having the ability to do also --remove for the fully cracked hash would be great.
--
already implemented! opposite of --show... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,307 |
02-10-2012, 04:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
| @f0cker thats the correct behaivior. if its not correct displayed in your shell its more likely its a terminal emulation problem. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,307 |
02-23-2012, 05:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
| @mastercracker latest beta supports LM chunks, try out pls |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,307 |
02-23-2012, 05:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
|
undeath Wrote: (02-23-2012, 05:11 PM)
--
atom Wrote: (02-23-2012, 05:07 PM)
--
@f0cker thats the correct behaivior. if its not correct displayed in your shell its more likely its a terminal emulatio... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,307 |
02-23-2012, 05:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
Post: RE: Missing partial password chunk in LM cracking
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
23 |
45,307 |
05-08-2012, 04:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: missing glibc 2.14
Post: RE: missing glibc 2.14
| i got several of the same reports. its because i am compiling the binaries on ubuntu 12.04 which is using a bleeding edge new glibc. most of the other distributions do not yet ship it. maybe it will c... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
12,729 |
05-23-2012, 04:23 PM |
| |
|
Thread: missing glibc 2.14
Post: RE: missing glibc 2.14
| still no workaround for this found. anyone has an idea? |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
11 |
12,729 |
06-02-2012, 09:51 PM |
