Search Results
|
Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Mask Processor Rule Generation Bug.
Post: RE: Mask Processor Rule Generation Bug.
thread continued here: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-667.html
this one is closed. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
5 |
11,042 |
11-25-2011, 10:10 AM |
|
|
Thread: Mask Processor Help
Post: RE: Mask Processor Help
you cant, you have to run multiple commands |
|
atom |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
2 |
10,396 |
10-01-2011, 01:22 AM |
|
|
Thread: mask processor
Post: RE: mask processor
The maskprocessor options -q and -r are not supported by hashcat. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
3 |
2,104 |
04-05-2019, 04:33 PM |
|
|
Thread: Mask prepend string performance
Post: RE: Mask prepend string performance
It's not a bug, it's how it's designed. Depending on the hash-type, which you didn't specify, you can workaround this easily. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
5,525 |
07-21-2016, 10:24 AM |
|
|
Thread: Mask prepend string performance
Post: RE: Mask prepend string performance
If it's MD5, just append the known substring as a salt. That means, have a hash file in this format:
hash:pass
And then use -m 20 to crack it with the mask ?l?l?l?l?l?l
That should give you a... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
5,525 |
07-22-2016, 10:20 AM |
|
|
Thread: Mask prepend string performance
Post: RE: Mask prepend string performance
No, that's related to a cryptographic flaw in MD5. But you can exploit it only efficient in a salt-appending situation. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
5,525 |
07-22-2016, 12:06 PM |
|
|
Thread: mask performance
Post: RE: mask performance
?d is a very small charset. so, as long as you do not get this warning on startup:
WARNING: words in wordlist_left < ...
you should use the first. otherwise the 2nd. see docs/performance.txt |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
7,490 |
06-25-2010, 11:09 AM |
|
|
Thread: mask password without 3 or more recurring characters
Post: RE: mask password without 3 or more recurring char...
maskprocessor can do that for "aaa", but not for different cases like "EeE". |
|
atom |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
3 |
5,149 |
07-17-2016, 06:01 PM |
|
|
Thread: mask password without 3 or more recurring characters
Post: RE: mask password without 3 or more recurring char...
No, can't work from within hashcat |
|
atom |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
3 |
5,149 |
07-18-2016, 12:45 PM |
|
|
Thread: mask for MAC Address
Post: RE: mask for MAC Address
i think you want this:
Code:
--
-1 ?dABCDEF ?1?1:?1?1:?1?1:?1?1:?1?1:?1?1
--
or your optimized version (which will not work if mobile devices are involved):
Code:
--
-1 ?dABCDEF 00:?1?1:?1?1:?... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
4 |
14,587 |
11-12-2011, 10:03 AM |
|
|
Thread: mask for MAC Address
Post: RE: mask for MAC Address
sure, but he did not mention lowercase. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
4 |
14,587 |
11-12-2011, 06:34 PM |
|
|
Thread: mask file for WPA
Post: RE: mask file for WPA
I've tested this but can't reproduce. How did you check the timers? |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
6 |
9,624 |
11-19-2015, 12:10 PM |
|
|
Thread: Mask error?
Post: RE: Mask error?
hey ho.. i cant reproduce this locally, see my tests:
Quote:
--
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-plus-0.08# mkpasswd -m md5 panthers77 > hash
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-plus-0.08# echo -n panthers77 | ./oclHashcat-... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
9,985 |
01-25-2012, 11:27 PM |
|
|
Thread: Mask error?
Post: RE: Mask error?
excellent find. i can confirm its a bug. i was able to reproduce this locally and i have already fixed it.
it occours in -a 6 when the base word side is < length 8, because oclhashcat-plus reject... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
5 |
9,985 |
01-26-2012, 07:10 AM |
|
|
Thread: Mask attack issues
Post: RE: Mask attack issues
Should have cracked 8 length passwords. I tried locally and it worked fine |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
3,836 |
02-16-2017, 07:29 PM |
|
|
Thread: Mask attack issues
Post: RE: Mask attack issues
If we both can't reproduce the issue, the chances that there's no issue is higher than it is user error |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
3,836 |
02-16-2017, 09:28 PM |
|
|
Thread: Mask attack for unique characters?
Post: RE: Mask attack for unique characters?
You're lucky I've recently added that feature to maskprocessor v0.69. You can control the number of concurrent chars with the -q parameter. You can get it here: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=mas... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,951 |
03-22-2013, 08:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: Mask Attack -> Approaching Final Keyspace
Post: RE: Mask Attack -> Approaching Final Keyspace
This is pebkac!
Such a keyspace is done in no time: 10 * (4 ^ 12) = 167,772,160 |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
14,441 |
07-21-2016, 10:27 AM |
|
|
Thread: Mask Attack -> Approaching Final Keyspace
Post: RE: Mask Attack -> Approaching Final Keyspace
Yes, I already said it's pebkac. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
14,441 |
07-24-2016, 03:37 PM |
|
|
Thread: Mask attack
Post: RE: Mask attack
you are right, it is not possible. the only exceptions is if you are on linux. in this case you could use a file-fifo and use maskprocessor as sender. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
1 |
5,902 |
10-27-2011, 09:31 AM |