|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
Post: RE: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
| WPA/WPA2 support isnt built in yet |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
22 |
40,101 |
02-09-2013, 06:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
Post: RE: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
22 |
40,101 |
02-13-2013, 01:18 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
Post: RE: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
| I am adding WPA/WPA2 and once its done I will release new version |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
22 |
40,101 |
03-03-2013, 08:22 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
Post: RE: Is it possible to run Hashcat on XP
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
22 |
40,101 |
03-06-2013, 12:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it better to use princeprocessor rather than using Hashcat alone?
Post: RE: Is it better to use princeprocessor rather tha...
| There's no difference, performance-wise |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
7 |
7,903 |
03-27-2017, 02:01 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it better to use princeprocessor rather than using Hashcat alone?
Post: RE: Is it better to use princeprocessor rather tha...
| I think you're confusing what we mean with "performance". That is the number of passwords candidates that are generated in a specific time. It has no relation in how likely such a guess is. That's why... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
7 |
7,903 |
03-27-2017, 03:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it better to use princeprocessor rather than using Hashcat alone?
Post: RE: Is it better to use princeprocessor rather tha...
| I think royce explained it pretty well. In real life, forensics, pentester and others that do hash cracking as part of their job have no time to attend the process of hash cracking. Even less, they ha... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
7 |
7,903 |
03-28-2017, 10:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it a md5 colision ?
Post: RE: Is it a md5 colision ?
| Note for me:
Code:
--
root@sf:~/hashcat-0.45# ./hashcat-cliXOP.bin hash dict
Initializing hashcat v0.45 by atom with 8 threads and 32mb segment-size...
Added hashes from file hash: 1 (1 salts)
Act... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
15 |
33,320 |
04-12-2013, 08:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it a md5 colision ?
Post: RE: Is it a md5 colision ?
| I agree, nice testing philsmd |
|
atom |
General Help
|
15 |
33,320 |
04-15-2013, 10:01 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Is it a md5 colision ?
Post: RE: Is it a md5 colision ?
| No, you can not. But I've seen lots of hashlist examples where admins salting hashes with 0-bytes. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
15 |
33,320 |
04-19-2013, 10:47 AM |
| |
|
Thread: is hashcat support an ordinary exe\cmd file?
Post: RE: is hashcat support an ordinary exe\cmd file?
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,304 |
06-20-2017, 09:58 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Is hashcat able to utilize the cores in a Xeon PHI ?
Post: RE: Is hashcat able to utilize the cores in a Xeon...
| There's a limit to 128 devices per instance, but I can simply increase this in the sourcecode without the need of changing anything else. This is mostly related to memory allocations.
It should be ... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
2 |
3,274 |
07-28-2017, 01:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is dictionary file masking being removed?
Post: RE: Is dictionary file masking being removed?
| No it should work. Probably related to refactoring, please open a github issue otherwise it's forgotten. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,756 |
09-27-2016, 03:02 PM |
| |
|
Thread: is descrypt slow after ocl v1.31?
Post: RE: is descrypt slow after ocl v1.31?
| I'm testing with the following system:
Quote:
--
Device #1: GeForce GTX 980, 4095MB, 1215Mhz, 16MCU
Device #2: GeForce GTX 750 Ti, 2047MB, 1110Mhz, 5MCU
Device #3: GeForce GTX 560 Ti, 1023MB, ... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
9,831 |
04-21-2015, 03:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: is descrypt slow after ocl v1.31?
Post: RE: is descrypt slow after ocl v1.31?
| Btw, my gutfeeling tells me this could be maybe somehow related to password length (and rejection). Try with a wordlist where no word has the length > 8 |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
9,831 |
04-21-2015, 03:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: is descrypt slow after ocl v1.31?
Post: RE: is descrypt slow after ocl v1.31?
| I've changed rejection handling for v1.36 as it was with v1.31. It's clearly superior. You should test with latest beta version |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
9,831 |
04-22-2015, 12:47 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Is CUDA 6 going to help the CUDA hashcats?
Post: RE: Is CUDA 6 going to help the CUDA hashcats?
| No, CUDA 6 is aimed for GPU beginners. You don't need to understand some basic concepts and can simply start coding. But nothing that helps us in terms of performance. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
1 |
4,904 |
11-19-2013, 10:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Is cracking WPA/TKIP faster than WPA2/AES?
Post: RE: Is cracking WPA/TKIP faster than WPA2/AES?
| Wait, oclHashcat-plus is not cracking the cipherstream, it's cracking the handshake. Therefore, it makes no difference in terms of speed if it's WPA1 or WPA2. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
6 |
22,175 |
08-08-2013, 06:18 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Is cracking WPA/TKIP faster than WPA2/AES?
Post: RE: Is cracking WPA/TKIP faster than WPA2/AES?
| The slow PBKDF2 part is same for both, which is why they have the same speed. After that, WPA1 uses MD5 while WPA2 uses SHA1 but thats so fast compared to the slow part that you wont see a difference. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
6 |
22,175 |
08-12-2013, 03:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: is anyone run a benchmark with gtx1060 in hashcat v3.0？
Post: RE: is anyone run a benchmark with gtx1060 in hash...
| No, except for SCRYPT based algorithms, the gpu ram doesn't matter when it comes to raw performance. |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
12 |
46,633 |
06-30-2017, 09:06 AM |
