|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: void _des_crypt_decrypt?
Post: RE: void _des_crypt_decrypt?
| For pure DES encryption or decryption you might want to check out the old DES oracle algorithm in -m 3100 |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
6,457 |
07-05-2016, 08:15 AM |
| |
|
Thread: void _des_crypt_decrypt?
Post: RE: void _des_crypt_decrypt?
| In DES, for decrypt, you just access the sboxes in reverse. See https://www.scs.stanford.edu/histar/src/pkg/uclibc/libcrypt/des.c how it handles de_keysl[] and en_keysl[] |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
6,457 |
07-05-2016, 08:56 AM |
| |
|
Thread: VLIW on NVidia Cuda
Post: RE: VLIW on NVidia Cuda
| VLIW code for NVidia is only required for cheap sm_21 models. Basically Ti series cards < 9xx series, like the 560Ti. It is required to get out maximum performance for those cards. With newer cards yo... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
4,382 |
01-12-2016, 08:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Virtual OpenCL (VCL) support
Post: RE: Virtual OpenCL (VCL) support
| This sounds interessting, but it looks like its linux only or am I wrong? In this case, native network support would be better. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
3 |
15,121 |
08-17-2012, 11:41 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Virtual OpenCL (VCL) support
Post: RE: Virtual OpenCL (VCL) support
| Done with oclHashcat-plus v0.09: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1541.html
Thread closed |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
3 |
15,121 |
09-07-2012, 05:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Very slow WPA cracking on NVIDIA 8500 GT Windows
Post: RE: Very slow WPA cracking on NVIDIA 8500 GT Windo...
| Take a look at the benchmarks: https://hashcat.net/oclhashcat/ to get an idea about the performance relative |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
17,252 |
03-05-2014, 05:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Very slow WPA cracking on NVIDIA 8500 GT Windows
Post: RE: Very slow WPA cracking on NVIDIA 8500 GT Windo...
| there is no gpu in the world that can do 600k please read it again carefully |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
17,252 |
03-05-2014, 06:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Very slow speed
Post: RE: Very slow speed
| 1. Do not confuse -d and -D, those are different options
2. To make use of all your devices, make sure to have the OpenCL runtime of all of them installed correctly |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
16 |
21,605 |
11-11-2016, 11:14 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Very slow speed
Post: RE: Very slow speed
| Please try again with latest hashcat beta, it will show us if your opencl installation is ok. You can find it here: https://hashcat.net/beta/ |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
16 |
21,605 |
11-11-2016, 09:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Very slow speed
Post: RE: Very slow speed
| I don't think it will work, but this is some opencl issue, not hashcat. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
16 |
21,605 |
11-14-2016, 09:32 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Very slow speed
Post: RE: Very slow speed
| This is the best hint I can give you:
https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#i_may_have_the_wrong_driver_installed_what_should_i_do
Follow it *exactly*. If it does not h... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
16 |
21,605 |
11-16-2016, 05:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Very slow speed
Post: RE: Very slow speed
| By default, if hashcat detect a GPU, it will not use the CPU. You have do enable it manually if you really want to do this. Use -D 1,2 (uppercase D!)
The ADL_Overdrive6_FanSpeed_Get() is just an er... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
16 |
21,605 |
11-21-2016, 01:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Very slow Hash
Post: RE: Very slow Hash
| Office 2013 Hash *is* that slow. Your CPU issue doesn't have an influence on it. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
3 |
4,619 |
03-18-2017, 04:33 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Very slow Hash
Post: RE: Very slow Hash
|
atom |
General Talk
|
3 |
4,619 |
03-20-2017, 09:56 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Very low hashrate on two 770s
Post: RE: Very low hashrate on two 770s
| Sounds about right, its pbkdf2-hmac-sha512. What let's you think it should be faster, or what did you expect? |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
6,675 |
05-19-2016, 08:22 PM |
| |
|
Thread: very long salt
Post: RE: very long salt
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
9,431 |
06-21-2012, 10:07 AM |
| |
|
Thread: very long salt
Post: RE: very long salt
| Why? At least jtr has the same limitation:
salted_sha1_fmt_plug.c:#define PLAINTEXT_LENGTH (55-MAX_SALT_LEN) |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
5 |
9,431 |
06-21-2012, 02:20 PM |
| |
|
Thread: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./cudaHashcat64.bin)
Post: RE: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./...
| The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali) needs to update to more recent glibc, this is really annoying |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
34,165 |
06-12-2014, 06:14 PM |
| |
|
Thread: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./cudaHashcat64.bin)
Post: RE: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./...
| ask The-Distribution-Which-Does-Not-Handle-OpenCL-Well (Kali) dev's to do it |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
34,165 |
06-13-2014, 12:13 PM |
| |
|
Thread: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./cudaHashcat64.bin)
Post: RE: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by ./...
| Can't you just pull out the required glibc files from the ubuntu package and then use LD_PRELOAD? |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
34,165 |
06-26-2014, 01:04 PM |
