Search Results
|
Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: vBulletin: md5(md5($pass).$salt) - command line ?!
Post: RE: vBulletin: md5(md5($pass).$salt) - command lin...
this has been implemented in oclHashcat v0.20 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
30,401 |
01-31-2011, 06:14 PM |
|
|
Thread: Vbulletin v4 salted hash command
Post: RE: Vbulletin v4 salted hash command
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
6 |
13,134 |
10-21-2012, 05:44 PM |
|
|
Thread: vBulletin Salt Length
Post: RE: vBulletin Salt Length
undeath Wrote: (03-18-2012, 03:06 PM)
--
The problem is that both require their own module/kernel because there are different optimizations. While for vb3 hashes two rounds of md5 are sufficient, vb4... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
9 |
22,262 |
03-18-2012, 07:20 PM |
|
|
Thread: vBulletin Salt Length
Post: RE: vBulletin Salt Length
PWP needs to do this, too. It just automates the process internally. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
9 |
22,262 |
03-19-2012, 11:12 AM |
|
|
Thread: vBulletin Salt Length
Post: RE: vBulletin Salt Length
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
9 |
22,262 |
03-22-2012, 07:29 PM |
|
|
Thread: vBulletin :)
Post: RE: vBulletin :)
sorry man, posting hashes is against the board rules. you couldnt know that since the forum rule post was lost during the server movement. so i just masked your hash. its simple, just use -m 15 |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
2 |
8,805 |
08-17-2011, 08:31 PM |
|
|
Thread: Vbulletin 4.0.3
Post: RE: Vbulletin 4.0.3
if you are completly new to hashcat, checkout these links: https://hashcat.net/wiki/#howtos_videos_papers_articles_etc_in_the_wild |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-lite Support
|
2 |
7,535 |
03-11-2012, 01:12 PM |
|
|
Thread: Vbulletin - No results (-m 5)
Post: RE: Vbulletin - No results (-m 5)
yes, me too. seems to be in the hex salt parsing routine in vbull3. thanks for reporting!
use the ascii representation as a workaround: 1d943092622834160a09d54a4655781b:c>!
|
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
10,546 |
11-22-2011, 07:48 PM |
|
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up + EDiT
M@LIK Wrote: (09-02-2012, 09:54 PM)
--
System: Windows7 64-bit, nVidia, 304,79 beta, oclHashcat-plus-0.09b68.
oclHashcat-plus-0.08
-m0:
hc64p -n320 --gpu-loops=512 -a3 -1 ?l?u?d?s --runtime=120 ..\M... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,867 |
09-03-2012, 10:25 AM |
|
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up (Y U JOIN MY POSTS?!)
M@LIK Wrote: (09-03-2012, 03:48 PM)
--
Windows7 64-bit, nVidia, 304,79 beta, oclHashcat-plus-0.09b70.
Starting with previous bugs:
-m3100: Fixed! Great job as always!
-m3000:
.... -a0: This i... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,867 |
09-03-2012, 08:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
Quote:
--
-m130: Good Job! -a7 bug on -m130, -m131 and -m132 fixed!
--
Thx :)
Quote:
--
-m500: Fails to crack any 1-character-long password.
-m1600: -m500's problem.
--
Can reproduce... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,867 |
09-01-2012, 04:58 PM |
|
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
b63 is up!
fixed:
Quote:
--
-m500: Fails to crack any 1-character-long password.
-m1600: -m500's problem.
-m2811: MyBB1.2+ uses 8_?l?u?d salt, please add an exception.
--
pls test |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,867 |
09-01-2012, 08:05 PM |
|
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
b64 is up!
fixed:
Quote:
--
-m1710: -a1, -a6 and -a7 fail on all lengths.
--
|
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,867 |
09-01-2012, 08:26 PM |
|
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
Quote:
--
-m2811: I'm afraid this still appear 'Line-length exception'.
--
need example hash pls |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,867 |
09-01-2012, 08:28 PM |
|
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
Quote:
--
-m3000: ... (maybe!)
--
cannot reproduce any error, works fine |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,867 |
09-01-2012, 08:36 PM |
|
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
b65 is up !
fixed:
Quote:
--
-m2811: 'Line-length exception'.
--
are we done? |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,867 |
09-01-2012, 08:47 PM |
|
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
Sorry dude when I have a run I must take it!
b66 is up.
@K9, @Blandy: With this version, multihash performance problems should be fixed!!! |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,867 |
09-01-2012, 09:28 PM |
|
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
blandyuk Wrote: (09-01-2012, 09:59 PM)
--
@atom, got oclhc-plus v0.09b66 using cat 12.6, speed issue same:
v0.08
oclHashcat-plus64.exe -m 0 -a 3 -n 320 --remove -o foundMD5.txt -1 ?d?l 32_hex.txt... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,867 |
09-01-2012, 11:29 PM |
|
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
guys check out b67. multihash performance rocks |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,867 |
09-01-2012, 11:38 PM |
|
|
Thread: v62 is up
Post: RE: v62 is up
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
58 |
54,867 |
09-02-2012, 12:09 AM |