|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
| I am not sure. My testhashes look like this:
echo -n 1306 | ./oclHashcat-plus64.bin -m 141 '$episerver$*0*Mzc2NzY1NTU0MTM3NDIxOA==*ITBVvl4lw3w7UGLk/soqInuRkos='
echo -n 56038 ... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-21-2012, 08:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
| Dynamic salt length should work now (New version uploaded). Here are the requested hashes:
Quote:
--
$episerver$*0*NzYyNDg4MDUxMTEx*IdPKaPmk3qyjeth39wskfa3Uei4=
$episerver$*0*MTAwMzA2NzU2MzA2NA==*A... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-22-2012, 10:03 AM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
| I tried to fix the bugs with 2711 and 2811 but they are driver related. Next thing is this:
Quote:
--
- Progress and rejected counters wrong.
--
@mastercracker: How can I reproduce? |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-23-2012, 01:46 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
| It depends on what you define a long salt. On -m 1710 supported are salts up to length 16. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-23-2012, 04:56 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-23-2012, 08:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
|
Quote:
--
- For -m 1710 sha512($pass.$salt), Bruteforce on length 4 fails. Everything else works.
- For -m 1800 sha512crypt, SHA512(Unix), -a 1 fails for length 15.
--
Should be fixed with b55, pl... |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-29-2012, 02:08 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V47 bugs AMD
Post: RE: V47 bugs AMD
| continue here pls:
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1517.html |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
20 |
18,649 |
08-29-2012, 09:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: v3.30-49-g2f81532 segfault
Post: RE: v3.30-49-g2f81532 segfault
| Please try to reproduce with latest beta (88) and report back |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
6,153 |
02-01-2017, 12:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V3.10 signature unmatched
Post: RE: V3.10 signature unmatched
| ubuntu server 16.04 not 14.04 |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
22,479 |
11-03-2016, 12:09 AM |
| |
|
Thread: V3.10 signature unmatched
Post: RE: V3.10 signature unmatched
| The hash posted works perfect, I have no problem loading it. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
22,479 |
11-03-2016, 01:29 AM |
| |
|
Thread: V3.10 signature unmatched
Post: RE: V3.10 signature unmatched
| Just do what darkseid4nk said. Just paste it into a file to save struggling with quotes and escapes. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
22,479 |
11-03-2016, 04:38 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V3.10 signature unmatched
Post: RE: V3.10 signature unmatched
| This works only on windows, because windows shell does not interpret the $ |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
22,479 |
11-04-2016, 08:55 AM |
| |
|
Thread: V3.00 showing wrong password
Post: RE: V3.00 showing wrong password
| I can reproduce this locally. If you can, please create an issue for it on github so it's not forgotten
Quote:
--
root@ht:~/hashcat# ./hashcat -m 1500 hjylVp0MsGLU. -a 3 ?d?d?d?d?l?l?l?l -w 3 --... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,960 |
06-09-2016, 05:52 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V3.00 showing wrong password
Post: RE: V3.00 showing wrong password
| Should be fixed with latest beta. Thanks for reporting |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,960 |
06-10-2016, 05:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: V3.00 showing wrong password
Post: RE: V3.00 showing wrong password
| Before we do the release version we run the unit tests, automated tests that crack random passwords for each algorithm. But you are using a beta version, those are not run through the unit tests, so y... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
7,960 |
06-10-2016, 07:21 PM |
| |
|
Thread: v3.00 beta 63 SHA1 error
Post: RE: v3.00 beta 63 SHA1 error
| It's a feature, not a bug. We only test the last 128 bit for correctness. Or said an other way, you will never find two password sharing the same last 128 bit therefore it's correct to do so. |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
4,134 |
06-09-2016, 05:40 PM |
| |
|
Thread: v3.0 : *.dic: No such file or directory
Post: RE: v3.0 : *.dic: No such file or directory
| I've put up a new beta (62). Please try again with that one. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
4,768 |
06-07-2016, 12:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: v23 issue
Post: RE: v23 issue
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
5,014 |
09-22-2010, 12:05 PM |
| |
|
Thread: v1.33 is much slower than v1.21,Can anyone test it
Post: RE: v1.33 is much slower than v1.21,Can anyone tes...
| I've reproduced the case, it's actually slower. Thanks for reporting!
But no worries, I already found the reason and fixed it. The bitmaps were optimized to run faster on a different hashlist size ... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
7,886 |
03-06-2015, 05:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: v1.32 oclhashcat64.exe has stopped working
Post: RE: v1.32 oclhashcat64.exe has stopped working
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
7 |
13,147 |
01-19-2015, 06:53 PM |
