|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Unicode == FUN
Post: RE: Unicode == FUN
| Only a fast one would makes sense. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
9 |
8,853 |
04-24-2017, 03:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Understanding speed-only
Post: RE: Understanding speed-only
| Note that --keyspace does not return the entire keyspace in case you're cracking fast hashes. It's only the base count, the amplifiers are left out and run inside the kernel. The "ms" count is the tim... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
4,168 |
04-20-2017, 08:31 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Understanding integer overflow
Post: RE: Understanding integer overflow
| No, hashcat is checking the overflow for every length, not just the minimum one. But it's checking the overflow whenever a new attack starts internally. If you use increment, each password length unfo... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,365 |
06-13-2017, 08:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: understanding dictionary/mask attack
Post: RE: understanding dictionary/mask attack
| read this article: https://ob-security.info/?p=56 |
|
atom |
General Help
|
4 |
16,780 |
09-27-2011, 12:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: understanding "Time.Estimated" in oclHashcat-plus "status" output
Post: RE: understanding "Time.Estimated" in oclHashcat-p...
| Yeah, its about 36740146/36738605 - which is not possible and usually happens after restore |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
15,077 |
01-15-2013, 01:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: ULM Replacement ?
Post: RE: ULM Replacement ?
| I created this sub-forum especially for discussing everything that is related to hashcracking. Of course I do not want to see any hashes posted here, so it should be legal talk. AFAIK, ULM is a wordli... |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
18 |
39,383 |
06-12-2012, 03:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS NVIDIA Setup Guide
Post: RE: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS NVIDIA Setup Guide
| Some comments:
Which Ubuntu version is it, I'm using server, and people should do so, too, but it's nowhere written down
The document does in no way show how to install the most important opencl pack... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
21 |
33,866 |
11-21-2016, 09:06 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS NVIDIA Setup Guide
Post: RE: Ubuntu 16.04 LTS NVIDIA Setup Guide
|
jimbas Wrote: (11-09-2017, 03:55 PM)
--
Very strange, I can set some values, but not the funspeed...
--
NV often changes the attribute names (when driver version updates). |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
21 |
33,866 |
11-12-2017, 09:34 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeon" driver OK these days?
Post: RE: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeo...
| The most important question is, does the new OSS driver support OpenCL.
At this point, radeon-crimson-15.12-15.302-151217a-297685e.zip is the best driver you can get for oclHashcat on linux.
But... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
17 |
36,357 |
04-25-2016, 11:42 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeon" driver OK these days?
Post: RE: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeo...
| I've updated one of my development systems to Ubuntu 16.04 to clarify the situation.
As you can read about almost everywhere, fglrx is no longer supported. That's mostly because X11 is not compatib... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
17 |
36,357 |
04-25-2016, 08:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeon" driver OK these days?
Post: RE: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeo...
| But no one yet seems to have found out how to do it, even there's alot of discussion going on about this topic. It's like some hidden mysterium. A pretty demoralizing argument is this:
Quote:
--
... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
17 |
36,357 |
04-25-2016, 08:59 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeon" driver OK these days?
Post: RE: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeo...
| No, because there's no support for 290x / 7970. Most people have these cards. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
17 |
36,357 |
06-19-2016, 11:37 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeon" driver OK these days?
Post: RE: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeo...
| Have you tried hashcat running with your driver? |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
17 |
36,357 |
07-09-2016, 09:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeon" driver OK these days?
Post: RE: Ubuntu 16.04 - fglrx is deprecated - is "radeo...
| Never heard of ADL_ConsoleMode_FileDescriptor_Set. Need to try out. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
17 |
36,357 |
07-11-2016, 11:05 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Ubuntu 10.10(64 bit)
Post: RE: Ubuntu 10.10(64 bit)
| what he meant is you have do run cudaHashcat-plus64 instead of oclHashcat-plus64 when working with nvidia. OCL is for AMD only. however, i cant recall seeing your card on any of the supported hardware... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
7 |
19,484 |
01-28-2012, 10:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: type example.dict
Post: RE: type example.dict
| There's two different ways to explain that there's two different ways to run hashcat. The only with the type command is a piped use-case. So whenever you have a program or generator that can produce t... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
5,327 |
03-16-2017, 10:21 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Twofish + whirlpool hash
Post: RE: Twofish + whirlpool hash
| If you want performance there's no way around rewriting the crypto functions on gpgpu. Or you do it half-way. Do only the slow stuff on GPU and the rest on CPU with a crypto library. |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
3 |
7,303 |
04-27-2015, 01:58 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Two questions about hash files and hybrid attack
Post: RE: Two questions about hash files and hybrid atta...
|
23732 Wrote: (09-08-2012, 10:29 PM)
--
When doing an attack against a file with multiple hashes, does oclHashcat-plus do the whole wordlist (or mask) against one hash at the time or does it one word ... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
5 |
11,843 |
09-08-2012, 10:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Two questions about hash files and hybrid attack
Post: RE: Two questions about hash files and hybrid atta...
| Yeah maybe. Make sure the sum of all rules is not > 500k. Tip: split them |
|
atom |
General Help
|
5 |
11,843 |
09-09-2012, 03:03 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Two hashes one result - why?
Post: RE: Two hashes one result - why?
| it's the same hash:
87487bb03941a7d1e702cc54ee81e7f61e5e46f554b47677279a59185baaba5f
and the same salt (only first 512 bit matter)
4b98bb3ebefd1c7195aa991916b7d7e683e992fd9a9d1355533456d62... |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
6 |
8,330 |
03-04-2015, 10:38 AM |
