|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Third-party utility: analyze_hc_restore
Post: RE: Third-party utility: analyze_hc_restore
| That would be nice, isn't it working anymore? |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
3 |
7,404 |
12-03-2016, 04:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: There's a tick on the pluscat!!![bug report on v0.10b2]
Post: RE: There's a tick on the pluscat!!![bug report on...
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,421 |
09-18-2012, 12:04 PM |
| |
|
Thread: The speed varies between 1300 KH / s and 608 KH / s
Post: RE: The speed varies between 1300 KH / s and 608 K...
| Maybe the large keyspace. Try something more normal like ?l?l?l?l?l?l?l?l and report if it still occurs |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,921 |
12-30-2016, 11:35 AM |
| |
|
Thread: The ATI/AMD Driver Thread
Post: RE: The ATI/AMD Driver Thread
| problem is, i need a linux version, since i am developing on linux. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
1 |
6,254 |
04-28-2012, 10:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
Post: RE: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
| Something is strange with that reports. See when I tried to execute your cmd I get:
Quote:
--
root@ht:~/oclHashcat# ./oclHashcat-plus64.bin --session=three -a 3 -m 0 -1 '?d?u?l?s?h?D?F?R' g2 '?1'
... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,231 |
01-04-2013, 11:41 AM |
| |
|
Thread: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
Post: RE: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
| OK cool, I can reproduce with this:
./oclHashcat-plus64.bin --gpu-loops 1024 -n 800 --remove -m 2811 uncracked.txt -o cracked.txt -a 3 -1 ?l?d?s?u?h?F?R?D
Looks not to complicated. Thanks for report... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,231 |
01-05-2013, 01:37 PM |
| |
|
Thread: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
Post: RE: The ?F code appears to cause a problem
| OK, code fixed. This bug was in the shared code so it is inside oclHashcat-lite as well.
@ Beta tester please confirm if its fixed. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
8 |
16,231 |
01-05-2013, 02:17 PM |
| |
|
Thread: the 34th char from ?s
Post: RE: the 34th char from ?s
|
meinname123 Wrote: (05-06-2010, 12:43 AM)
--
Hi,
what is the 34th char on the ?s Mask in oclHashcat?
I see only 33 on --help
Code:
--
?s = !"#$%&'()*+,-./:;?@[\]^_`{|}~
--
--
nice catch, it... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
7,522 |
05-06-2010, 09:23 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Testing
Post: RE: Testing
| Yeah run tools/test.sh (for oclHashcat). It creates all the files it needs to do the tests using tools/test.pl (which is something like pass_gen.pl) |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
8,229 |
12-19-2015, 04:27 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Tesla K20m sha512crypt dictionary attack performance issues
Post: RE: Tesla K20m sha512crypt dictionary attack perfo...
| Maybe you get confused because benchmark uses a single salt while you are trying to crack 10 salts at once. So your speed is actually 25kH/s which matches your benchmark results |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
5 |
12,932 |
02-24-2014, 01:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: temperature limit reached, aborting
Post: RE: temperature limit reached, aborting
| In (ocl)hashcat version 2.xx it's not ok, it just hadn't the code to query the status from the system but it would occur the same way. Just fix your cooling issues. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
2,823 |
09-01-2016, 07:08 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Temperature indicates 0 degree celcius
Post: RE: Temperature indicates 0 degree celcius
| You need to update to a recent driver. The one in Ubuntu 10.10 repo is totally outdated. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
3 |
8,677 |
04-02-2012, 09:42 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Temperature control for multiple sessions
Post: RE: Temperature control for multiple sessions
| Do not run two instances with gpu temp control. Use --gpu-temp-disable on every 2nd+ instance |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
2 |
5,834 |
01-19-2017, 04:07 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Temperature abort trigger NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670
Post: RE: Temperature abort trigger NVIDIA GeForce GTX 6...
| try some lower workload settings, like -n 8 -u 32
this is will decrease performance but maybe stabilize your system |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
14 |
28,035 |
10-12-2014, 12:19 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Telegram Desktop passcode
Post: RE: Telegram Desktop passcode
| Comparison after KDF doesn't sound too complex to me (except IGE mode which I don't know what it does but block-modes tend to be simple because they have to be fast). There's much more complex kernels... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
3,573 |
06-21-2018, 02:00 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Telegram Desktop passcode
Post: RE: Telegram Desktop passcode
| Yeah, everything is done on GPU (which is written in OpenCL, which is a reduced C). |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
3,573 |
06-22-2018, 09:48 AM |
| |
|
Thread: TeamSpeak Hash?
Post: RE: TeamSpeak Hash?
| If you add a ticket to TRAC we can make a parser for it so that oclHashcat can natively crack them |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
25,730 |
06-15-2015, 07:24 PM |
| |
|
Thread: TeamSpeak Hash?
Post: RE: TeamSpeak Hash?
| Is this from the same Teamspeak server as the first hash? |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
25,730 |
06-20-2015, 12:49 AM |
| |
|
Thread: TC password found, wrong?
Post: RE: TC password found, wrong?
| Please send me the first 512 byte and the incorrect password so that we can reproduce and fix the problem |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
15,462 |
04-18-2016, 05:11 PM |
| |
|
Thread: TC password found, wrong?
Post: RE: TC password found, wrong?
| Thanks for the file you've provided. I've analyzed it.
The first thing I tried to reproduce is why JtR isn't cracking it. It turns out the reason is that JtR doesn't support boot-mode TC cracking. ... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
15,462 |
04-20-2016, 02:43 PM |
