Search Results
|
Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: [split] hashcat v0.39 - stdout thing
Post: RE: [split] hashcat v0.39 - stdout thing
Dude, I had to move and split your post from the announcement section to this. Do it again and I will ban you for thread stealing. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
1 |
5,295 |
06-10-2012, 02:35 PM |
|
|
Thread: [split] Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing + UTF8/16 folder name
Post: RE: [split] Hashcat 3.0 inc_vendor.cl missing + UT...
OK, good to know anyway. Closed. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
3 |
4,880 |
07-04-2016, 12:37 PM |
|
|
Thread: [split] Feature/Algo poll oclHashcat v0.23 (DES support)
Post: RE: [split] Feature/Algo poll oclHashcat v0.23 (DE...
ok, that means we are still talking about theoretical numbers. in gpu computing even the smallest changes can have very big impact on speed. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
17,092 |
07-14-2010, 01:46 PM |
|
|
Thread: [split] Feature/Algo poll oclHashcat v0.23 (DES support)
Post: RE: [split] Feature/Algo poll oclHashcat v0.23 (DE...
Done with oclHashcat-plus v0.09: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1541.html
Thread closed |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
17,092 |
09-07-2012, 05:18 PM |
|
|
Thread: [split] cuLaunchGridAsync() 701
Post: RE: [split] cuLaunchGridAsync() 701
please check your PM i sent you a beta version for test. if it works, i will make it public. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
22,596 |
01-26-2011, 03:29 PM |
|
|
Thread: [split] cuLaunchGridAsync() 701
Post: RE: [split] cuLaunchGridAsync() 701
ok i can reproduce it. it is related to all 32bit sm_20 (fermi) kernels. i will fix it and release v0.25 later. thanks for reporting. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
22,596 |
01-26-2011, 02:54 PM |
|
|
Thread: [split] cuLaunchGridAsync() 701
Post: RE: [split] cuLaunchGridAsync() 701
seems we have a problem here. help me to reproduce it. please post screenshots, full commandline and if required the hashlist. check if this still occours if you use -n 1 or if you use dictionaries on... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
22,596 |
01-26-2011, 10:11 AM |
|
|
Thread: [split] cuLaunchGridAsync() 701
Post: RE: [split] cuLaunchGridAsync() 701
fixed in oclHashcat v0.25 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
10 |
22,596 |
01-31-2011, 05:47 PM |
|
|
Thread: [split] AMD SDK v2.5, Catalyst 11.7 and 11.8 - clGetDeviceIDs Error
Post: RE: [split] AMD SDK v2.5, Catalyst 11.7 and 11.8 -...
Radeon HD 3870 is not supported by AMD's OpenCL runtime :( |
|
atom |
General Help
|
1 |
8,077 |
09-16-2011, 12:30 PM |
|
|
Thread: [REQ]benchmark function
Post: RE: [REQ]benchmark function
This is what comes closest yet: https://thepasswordproject.com/oclhashcat_benchmarking |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
3 |
10,146 |
05-17-2012, 09:34 AM |
|
|
Thread: [Release] Unified List Manager (ULM)
Post: RE: [Release] Unified List Manager (ULM)
|
atom |
General Talk
|
10 |
25,579 |
06-21-2012, 10:04 AM |
|
|
Thread: [Release] Unified List Manager (ULM)
Post: RE: [Release] Unified List Manager (ULM)
|
atom |
General Talk
|
10 |
25,579 |
09-01-2012, 03:35 PM |
|
|
Thread: [oclHashcat-1.33] clCreateBuffer() -61 Error
Post: RE: [oclHashcat-1.33] clCreateBuffer() -61 Error
clCreateBuffer() -61 basically means "Out of Memory". That means your GPU memory. The number of hashes (plus the fact that they are salted) affects the required memory plus the wordload profile affect... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
13,310 |
03-03-2015, 02:53 PM |
|
|
Thread: [oclHashcat-1.33] clCreateBuffer() -61 Error
Post: RE: [oclHashcat-1.33] clCreateBuffer() -61 Error
It's as i said, the wordload profile affects the required memory, too. In your above example you used -w 3 with 1.33 and -w 2 with 1.31. That makes no sense unless you test 1.33 with -w 2 as well |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
13,310 |
03-05-2015, 12:56 PM |
|
|
Thread: [oclHashcat-1.33] clCreateBuffer() -61 Error
Post: RE: [oclHashcat-1.33] clCreateBuffer() -61 Error
I took my oldest card I have, a hd5770, and I tried to reproduce the problem. That card has only 256mb of GPU ram.
Quote:
--
root@sf:~/xy/oclHashcat-1.33# ./oclHashcat64.bin -a 3 -m 2711 -w 3 -... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
8 |
13,310 |
03-08-2015, 01:00 PM |
|
|
Thread: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
Post: RE: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
60 |
142,801 |
02-22-2011, 03:49 PM |
|
|
Thread: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
Post: RE: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
is there still interesst in WPA/WPA2? |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
60 |
142,801 |
08-22-2011, 01:51 PM |
|
|
Thread: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
Post: RE: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
expect support for WPA/WPA2 in the next oclHashcat-plus version |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
60 |
142,801 |
08-24-2011, 06:01 PM |
|
|
Thread: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
Post: RE: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
update: i send a patch to aircrack-ng project that aircrack-ng can export .hccap file which is required for cracking WPA/WPA2 in oclHashcat-plus. however, oclHashcat-plus will crack the hash only and ... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
60 |
142,801 |
08-26-2011, 06:42 PM |
|
|
Thread: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
Post: RE: [oclhashcat+] wpa/wpa2
Hash-IT Wrote: (08-26-2011, 10:24 PM)
--
Thank you, thank you and thank you atom !! :o)
Many people will be grateful for this feature and you have also saved us all from EWSA !!!
I am so please... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
60 |
142,801 |
08-30-2011, 10:28 AM |