Search Results
|
Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: rules and masks
Post: RE: rules and masks
You can use multi rules feature and use maskprocessor to generate rules (see wiki) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
2 |
5,306 |
09-15-2012, 10:25 PM |
|
|
Thread: rule vs. mask
Post: RE: rule vs. mask
See here: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=frequently_asked_questions#what_is_the_maximum_supported_password_length
Quote:
--
For fast hashes, the important factor is the attack mode:
attack-mo... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
6,380 |
08-25-2015, 05:51 PM |
|
|
Thread: rule to skip passwords with repeats
Post: RE: rule to skip passwords with repeats
That's not what rules do. What you're looking for is maskprocessors -q option. Please use maskprocessor in combination with hashcat's stdin feature. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
3,305 |
07-12-2016, 09:31 AM |
|
|
Thread: Rule syntax question
Post: RE: Rule syntax question
Quote:
--
So $$$1 is the same as $$ $1
--
Correct.
Quote:
--
meaning $$ as in I can put $$% for XXX% ? Why not $%...?
--
That makes no sense. Do you mean this?
$$ $%
That woul... |
|
atom |
General Help
|
9 |
12,637 |
02-23-2015, 12:06 AM |
|
|
Thread: Rule syntax
Post: RE: Rule synatx
you can use maskprocessor, multi-rules or hybrid attack. see wiki before asking |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
1 |
5,418 |
04-19-2012, 08:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: Rule shortcut
Post: RE: Rule shortcut
For that kind of attack you should use -a 1 not rules |
|
atom |
General Help
|
9 |
13,606 |
05-24-2015, 04:12 PM |
|
|
Thread: Rule Piping Request
Post: RE: Rule Piping Request
wait, we have a standalone solution for this: https://hashcat.net/wiki/rules_with_maskprocessor
|
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
20 |
45,531 |
11-18-2011, 10:25 AM |
|
|
Thread: Rule Piping Request
Post: RE: Rule Piping Request
yes there are limitations. in hashcat it tried to sort out dupliated rules and therefore has to manage an lookup-tree which requires memory. this means the more rules you add, the more startup-time is... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
20 |
45,531 |
11-19-2011, 11:03 AM |
|
|
Thread: Rule Piping Request
Post: RE: Rule Piping Request
rules for filtering non-printable ascii. this sounds somehow a bad idea. this have to be done with each execution of hashcat. if its that important, why not clean them in the source, in other words, i... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
20 |
45,531 |
11-22-2011, 05:18 AM |
|
|
Thread: Rule Piping Request
Post: RE: Rule Piping Request
here is a perl version. not the fastest, but had to write it quickly. maybe i add a filtering tool to hashcat-utils. till that, use this:
$ perl calc.pl < in.dict > out.dict
Code:
--
#!/usr/bin/en... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
20 |
45,531 |
11-22-2011, 08:13 PM |
|
|
Thread: Rule Piping Request
Post: RE: Rule Piping Request
look:
Quote:
--
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-plus-0.07# cat t.rule
$0
$1
$2
$3
$4
$5
$6
$7
$8
$9
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-plus-0.07# cat word
test
root@sf:~/oclHashcat-plus-0.07# echo -n test123 | md5sum
cc03e... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
20 |
45,531 |
11-29-2011, 05:04 PM |
|
|
Thread: Rule Piping Request
Post: RE: Rule Piping Request
yes, its exactly implemented this way. to be exact, its more than that. instead of just use 2 rule files, you can use up to 4 of them. this way, with some example minirules, we can emulate those "easy... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
20 |
45,531 |
11-30-2011, 11:51 AM |
|
|
Thread: Rule Piping Request
Post: RE: Rule Piping Request
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
20 |
45,531 |
11-30-2011, 01:56 PM |
|
|
Thread: Rule Piping Request
Post: RE: Rule Piping Request
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
20 |
45,531 |
12-07-2011, 10:42 PM |
|
|
Thread: Rule or hybrid attack
Post: RE: Rule or hybrid attack
i'd suggest using maskprocessor to generate the rules, see https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=rules_with_maskprocessor |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
2 |
5,369 |
02-02-2014, 12:12 AM |
|
|
Thread: Rule new
Post: RE: Rule new
There is rules that enable you to skip words from your wordlist based on certain criterias. See rejection section here: https://hashcat.net/wiki/doku.php?id=rule_based_attack
Note that for oclHashc... |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
3 |
7,867 |
05-09-2015, 11:59 AM |
|
|
Thread: Rule help
Post: RE: Rule help
|
atom |
hashcat
|
5 |
4,934 |
05-17-2017, 12:10 PM |
|
|
Thread: Rule Generation - Large Prefix + Postfix
Post: RE: Rule Generation - Large Prefix + Postfix
The total numbers for supported plains in hashcat cpu is 55 (including the ones generated by rules). Also note, if you use ^, to write stuff backwards. Its a common error. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
1 |
8,766 |
07-22-2013, 10:50 AM |
|
|
Thread: Rule Functions With Control Characters?
Post: RE: Rule Functions With Control Characters?
it works for all chars 0x00 - 0xff except 0x00 and \n -- just post the character as it is like i4ö |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
3,980 |
06-13-2014, 12:15 PM |
|
|
Thread: Rule file (very common 'complex' passwords)
Post: RE: Rule file (very common 'complex' passwords)
Hey, is it really 90% the ! character? Thanks for the rule! |
|
atom |
User Contributions
|
6 |
14,856 |
01-29-2014, 10:57 AM |