|
Search Results
|
| Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
| |
|
Thread: Reduced performance
Post: RE: Reduced performance
| Yes, this GPU has very bad performance when it comes to crypto |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
5,931 |
12-02-2016, 07:30 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Reduced performance
Post: RE: Reduced performance
| Nope, there's no good AWS GPU. AWS GPU's are good for floating point operations (flops), not raw integer power. In crypto, we need raw integer power. |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
4 |
5,931 |
12-02-2016, 07:49 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Reduced MD5
Post: RE: Reduced MD5
| the compare code is in the kernel not in the oclhashcat binary. however this is a single-user request so it will have lower priority. if i have some spare time i will add it. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
19,171 |
09-20-2010, 09:31 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Reduced MD5
Post: RE: Reduced MD5
| I dont know of any. It would require a special new kernel to do it. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
7 |
19,171 |
09-13-2012, 10:27 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Reduce special charset
Post: RE: Reduce special charset
| this was fixed in the meanwhile. to use ? you have to use ??. also you can use --hex-salt or --hex-charset if quoting fails. |
|
atom |
General Help
|
3 |
9,154 |
01-10-2012, 04:54 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Recovery file for hashcat
Post: RE: Recovery file for hashcat
| ok, recovery file maybe in the next version. the increment function just starts with the length defined in --bf-pw-min (default = 1) and ends when finished the length defined in --bf-pw-max (default =... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
11,033 |
01-11-2011, 10:13 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Recovery file for hashcat
Post: RE: Recovery file for hashcat
| Resume / Restore support added to latest oclHashcat-plus version. Thread closed. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
11,033 |
01-02-2013, 12:36 PM |
| |
|
Thread: recovering Sha1+salt password with oclHashCat
Post: RE: recovering Sha1+salt password with oclHashCat
| awesome, thanks. thread closed. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
1 |
9,832 |
08-21-2011, 03:42 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Recover passwords in output user:plain
Post: RE: Recover passwords in output user:plain
| hashcat cant do that, oclHashcat-plus can. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
9 |
32,233 |
03-14-2012, 10:34 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Recover passwords in output user:plain
Post: RE: Recover passwords in output user:plain
| make sure the cracked hashes can be found in hashcat.pot, then use a combination of the --show and --username switches. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
9 |
32,233 |
03-14-2012, 05:10 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Recover passwords in output user:plain
Post: RE: Recover passwords in output user:plain
| This "feature" should work even without having a GPU. Try it pls and report. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
9 |
32,233 |
03-18-2012, 07:25 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Recover passwords in output user:plain
Post: RE: Recover passwords in output user:plain
| see here: https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-985-post-5037.html#pid5037 |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
9 |
32,233 |
03-19-2012, 11:17 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Recover password from FreeArc file
Post: RE: Recover password from FreeArc file
|
atom |
hashcat
|
1 |
1,570 |
03-03-2019, 11:43 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Recover NTLM with charset: !@$etaoinshrdlu134579
Post: RE: Recover NTLM with charset: !@$etaoinshrdlu1345...
| You can also put all characters into a file (all in one line) and then use -1 filename
Should save you headache about the escaping |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
9 |
17,222 |
02-23-2014, 11:45 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Recomended setup for hashcat
Post: RE: Recomended setup for hashcat
| There is no way getting around expensive cards. In case of GPGPU only the expensive ones are the good ones.
The hd7970 is a single GPU while the hd6990 is a dual-GPU card. When the hd7990 comes out ... |
|
atom |
Hardware
|
3 |
8,473 |
04-16-2012, 09:52 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Reassign tasks
Post: RE: Reassign tasks
| sry, redistribution is currently not possible |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
10,473 |
07-12-2010, 10:29 AM |
| |
|
Thread: Reading very large dicts
Post: RE: Reading very large dicts
| no, because if you change the dictionary the stored numbers become invalid.
you can work-around the line counter by using |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
17,237 |
04-16-2012, 03:48 PM |
| |
|
Thread: Reading very large dicts
Post: RE: Reading very large dicts
| if there is enough demand, yes |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
11 |
17,237 |
04-17-2012, 05:26 PM |
| |
|
Thread: reading directories with dictionaries in combinator mode
Post: RE: reading directories with dictionaries in combi...
|
Quote:
--
I think it will be good to grab all the dictionaries from the folder (or folders, if the second "dictionary" will be actually a directory too) and mix them sequentially.
--
do it with... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
10,429 |
01-20-2012, 01:43 PM |
| |
|
Thread: reading directories with dictionaries in combinator mode
Post: RE: reading directories with dictionaries in combi...
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
4 |
10,429 |
01-21-2012, 09:50 AM |
