Search Results
|
Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: [help] Unknown option --output-file= "error"
Post: RE: [help] Unknown option --output-file= "error"
It's simply
--outfile=FILE |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
9 |
12,627 |
02-13-2015, 04:59 PM |
|
|
Thread: [HELP] Read russian,arabic, chinese,ecc.. from a wordlist
Post: RE: [HELP] Read russian,arabic, chinese,ecc.. from...
then you need to guess, try all encodings |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
8,309 |
04-05-2015, 11:31 PM |
|
|
Thread: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
Post: RE: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
32 byte salt is not supported since v0.24. max 31 byte. |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
40,947 |
01-27-2011, 10:50 AM |
|
|
Thread: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
Post: RE: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
i forgot about the joomla effect. you are right, they have 32 bytes. i will bring it back in next version. but yeah, it will require an additional if () so the performance will drop a little bit. its ... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
40,947 |
02-20-2011, 09:57 AM |
|
|
Thread: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
Post: RE: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
40,947 |
12-16-2011, 01:12 PM |
|
|
Thread: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
Post: RE: [Help] Joomla 1.5.X hash
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
13 |
40,947 |
12-16-2011, 03:44 PM |
|
|
Thread: [HD6950]benchmark
Post: RE: [HD6950]benchmark
|
atom |
Hardware
|
2 |
8,493 |
05-22-2012, 10:47 PM |
|
|
Thread: [hashcat] MD5 frrom Linux
Post: RE: [hashcat] MD5 frrom Linux
$2a$ is not supported, its blowfish not MD5 |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
1 |
7,375 |
02-13-2011, 12:33 PM |
|
|
Thread: [hashcat] Add -j and -k parameters
Post: RE: [hashcat] Add -j and -k parameters
Please use the ticket tracker https://hashcat.net/trac/ |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
9 |
25,605 |
01-21-2013, 12:00 PM |
|
|
Thread: [hashcat-0.37] bug in substitute rule
Post: RE: [hashcat-0.37] bug in substitute rule
thats right! thanks for reporting :) btw i have already fixed this in v0.38 beta. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
1 |
6,019 |
09-11-2011, 12:03 PM |
|
|
Thread: [hashcat v0.41] Bug when using ?a with custom charset ?1
Post: RE: [hashcat v0.41] Bug when using ?a with custom ...
I can confirm this bug, thanks! |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
7,013 |
10-08-2012, 10:19 AM |
|
|
Thread: [hashcat v0.41] Bug when using ?a with custom charset ?1
Post: RE: [hashcat v0.41] Bug when using ?a with custom ...
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
3 |
7,013 |
10-08-2012, 10:29 AM |
|
|
Thread: [fingerprint] combinator attack v0.13 bad, v0.15 good FYI upgrade!
Post: RE: [fingerprint] combinator attack v0.13 bad, v0....
Quote:
--
One last note about performance. There was a change to the status-display of the speed value which does not affect the real performance. With new oclHashcat-plus v0.15 the speed that is s... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
7,276 |
08-28-2013, 12:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: [cudahashcat-plus] WPA crack in batch ?
Post: RE: [cudahashcat-plus] WPA crack in batch ?
no, thats not possible. they salt with the essid. |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
2 |
7,721 |
03-31-2012, 12:01 PM |
|
|
Thread: [bug] oclHashcat-plus not printing plains
Post: RE: [bug] oclHashcat-plus not printing plains
can not reproduce this locally |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
12,480 |
11-07-2011, 02:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: [bug] oclHashcat-plus not printing plains
Post: RE: [bug] oclHashcat-plus not printing plains
since i can not reproduce it, no |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
6 |
12,480 |
12-06-2011, 11:34 AM |
|
|
Thread: [Bug] oclHashcat-plus --gpu-temp-retain
Post: RE: [Bug] oclHashcat-plus --gpu-temp-retain
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,285 |
08-13-2012, 10:07 AM |
|
|
Thread: [Bug] oclHashcat-plus --gpu-temp-retain
Post: RE: [Bug] oclHashcat-plus --gpu-temp-retain
james, pls retry and continue here pls :
https://hashcat.net/forum/thread-1523.html |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,285 |
09-01-2012, 03:30 PM |
|
|
Thread: [Bug] Hashcat v0.41 & oclHashcat v0.09 crash
Post: RE: [Bug] Hashcat v0.41 & oclHashcat v0.09 crash
Thanks undeath for testing |
|
atom |
General Talk
|
2 |
7,418 |
12-09-2012, 11:35 AM |
|
|
Thread: [bug] endless "Caching segment" in table mode
Post: RE: [bug] endless "Caching segment" in table mode
this is a known issue. it is already fixed in hashcat v0.38 beta. if you need it, PM me on IRC.
thanks for reporting.
|
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
1 |
7,233 |
11-18-2011, 10:47 AM |