Search Results
|
Post
[asc]
|
Author |
Forum |
Replies |
Views |
Posted |
|
|
Thread: Possible descrypt performance issue
Post: RE: Possible descrypt performance issue
It depends, sure there's a performance drop related to multihash because we can not know the salt value at compile time but as long as you use -a 3 the performance should be only a little bit slower. ... |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
6,359 |
01-12-2016, 02:17 PM |
|
|
Thread: Possible descrypt performance issue
Post: RE: Possible descrypt performance issue
Should be fixed with latest beta |
|
atom |
Old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
6,359 |
01-14-2016, 11:40 AM |
|
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
You need at least 100/X in your progress to have an ETC displayed |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,263 |
10-23-2012, 10:32 AM |
|
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Take the time it needs to inital display in -a 1 case and multiply it with the number of rules. That should work. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,263 |
10-24-2012, 10:31 AM |
|
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
You need at least (100 * nr-of-rules)/306706 in the progress to get an initial display. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,263 |
10-25-2012, 09:13 AM |
|
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Try a rule-file which contains a single ":" instead of NUL. This is a real empty rule. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,263 |
10-26-2012, 10:06 AM |
|
|
Thread: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Post: RE: Possible bug-no estimate if -a1 and -r
Adding rules add some calculation overhead, thats why you have no "-" words / s. This is what the ETC is based on. Thats the reason. Its to slow to calculate it. |
|
atom |
Old hashcat Support
|
13 |
22,263 |
10-27-2012, 08:35 AM |
|
|
Thread: Possible Bug With oclHashcat-plus-0.09b16
Post: RE: Possible Bug With oclHashcat-plus-0.09b16
This is the finished implementation of the poll #2 (increment brute force).
If you want it to start like in 0.07 add --bf-min 10. |
|
atom |
Beta Tester
|
2 |
3,437 |
06-05-2012, 09:54 AM |
|
|
Thread: Possible Bug When Defining Known Character
Post: RE: Possible Bug When Defining Known Character
i also can not reproduce it... guys, someone here who can reproduce this? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
4 |
11,450 |
04-10-2011, 06:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: Possible bug - Utilization reporting when specifying devices
Post: RE: Possible bug - Utilization reporting when spec...
This looks like a typical xorg.conf issue. Note that OpenCL devices and NVML devices (NVML is used to query utilization etc). do not share any unique identifier, so there's no way for hashcat to match... |
|
atom |
hashcat
|
2 |
3,603 |
07-27-2016, 10:57 AM |
|
|
Thread: Possible bug
Post: RE: Possible bug
iirc, the character ^ is (was?) the escape character on windows shell. so it is possible to create problems. not really sure about.
at least on my win7 box it does not crash, it worked as expected. b... |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
10,044 |
05-27-2010, 09:54 AM |
|
|
Thread: Possible bug
Post: RE: Possible bug
fixed with oclHashcat v0.25 :-) |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat Support
|
3 |
10,044 |
01-31-2011, 06:54 PM |
|
|
Thread: Possible bug
Post: RE: Possible bug
hey mastercracker, congrats for winning! and yes, phpass multihash issue will be fixed in 0.06 |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
8,634 |
08-19-2011, 10:29 AM |
|
|
Thread: Possible bug
Post: RE: Possible bug
can you please be a bit more specific and create a seperate thread for this? |
|
atom |
Very old oclHashcat-plus Support
|
3 |
8,634 |
08-19-2011, 07:16 PM |
|
|
Thread: Possible 16 digit combinations
Post: RE: Possible 16 digit combinations
It's a bad attack if you run a Fixed value in the beginning of the "Password". Use -m 20 instead, you will get a speedup of at least 100. |
|
atom |
hashcat-utils, maskprocessor, statsprocessor, md5stress, wikistrip
|
2 |
3,712 |
02-07-2018, 07:21 PM |
|
|
Thread: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
Post: RE: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
i dont know if there are any technical reasons for not adding zip or aes to gpgpu based cracking. i never looked into them. hc and oclhc are made for competition and these competitions usually base on... |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
27 |
130,517 |
10-26-2010, 09:48 AM |
|
|
Thread: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
Post: RE: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
27 |
130,517 |
11-15-2011, 03:34 PM |
|
|
Thread: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
Post: RE: Possibility of zip archive password cracking?
Hash-IT Wrote: (02-08-2012, 01:12 AM)
--
I have added the request here (https://hashcat.net/wiki/feature_requests).
We'll just have to see if he accepts it. :)
--
thanks for the update, looks nice |
|
atom |
Feature Requests
|
27 |
130,517 |
02-08-2012, 11:11 AM |
|
|
Thread: Positive Hack Days - Hash Runner (writeup)
Post: RE: Positive Hack Days - Hash Runner (writeup)
In theory yes. I am wondering why the PHDays organisators did not release them. Maybe there are some restrictions to be checked? |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
7 |
39,910 |
06-08-2012, 10:13 AM |
|
|
Thread: Positive Hack Days - Hash Runner (writeup)
Post: RE: Positive Hack Days - Hash Runner (writeup)
Finally, all the writeups, rules, stats and plaintexts were released:
https://phdays.com/program/contests/hashrunner/stat/ |
|
atom |
Organisation and Events
|
7 |
39,910 |
06-18-2012, 05:25 PM |